A Criticism of the Cell-Theory; being an Answer to Mr. Sedgwick's ...
A Criticism of the Cell-Theory; being an Answer to Mr. Sedgwick's ...
A Criticism of the Cell-Theory; being an Answer to Mr. Sedgwick's ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
A CRITICISM OP THE CELL-THEORY. 159<br />
unzweifelhaft, wie Engelm<strong>an</strong>n schon fiir die von ihm untersuchte<br />
Art nachgeweisen hat,' morphologischvollst<strong>an</strong>digeinereinzigen<br />
Zelle.' Aber auch mit der weiteren Entwicklung <strong>an</strong>dert sich<br />
dar<strong>an</strong> nichts. Mag die Zellhaut zu einer aus vielen einzeln<br />
zerlegbaren B<strong>an</strong>dern bestehenden muskuloses Hiille werden<br />
und mag der Kern in zwei Kerne zerfallen, wie in O. similis<br />
und O. caudata, oder durch fortgestzte Theilungen eine<br />
schliesslich sehr grosse Menge von Kernen aus sich hervorgehen<br />
lassen, wie in O. r<strong>an</strong>arum, 0. obtrigona und 0. dimidiata,<br />
die pro<strong>to</strong>plasmische Korpersubst<strong>an</strong>z selbst zeigt<br />
keine weitere Ver<strong>an</strong>derung als die der Masseuzunahme<br />
und blebt, wie auch Engelm<strong>an</strong>n hervorhebt,<br />
' Zeitlebens eine einzige zusammenh<strong>an</strong>gender Masse,<br />
•wie von eine einzigen Zelle. 5 " I have put <strong>the</strong> last passage<br />
in italics, because it expresses most clearly why Zeller <strong>an</strong>d o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
authors regard multinucleate forms as unicellular, namely<br />
because <strong>the</strong> pro<strong>to</strong>plasm showa no o<strong>the</strong>r ch<strong>an</strong>ge th<strong>an</strong> increase<br />
in size, <strong>an</strong>d because it remains, its life long, a single continuous<br />
mass. The same argument leads m<strong>an</strong>y <strong>to</strong> regard <strong>the</strong><br />
Coeloblastae as unicellular. The continuity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> pro<strong>to</strong>plasm,<br />
<strong>the</strong>n, is <strong>the</strong> test <strong>of</strong> unicellularity.<br />
If <strong>an</strong>ybody accepts this, he c<strong>an</strong>not escape from its logical<br />
consequences. Not only are multinucleate Pro<strong>to</strong>zoa <strong>an</strong>d<br />
Coeloblastae unicellular, but also <strong>the</strong> whole kingdom <strong>of</strong> pl<strong>an</strong>ts,<br />
for <strong>the</strong>ir pro<strong>to</strong>plasm is continuous: <strong>the</strong> developing Peripatus<br />
is unicellular, for its pro<strong>to</strong>plasm is continuous ; <strong>the</strong> epi<strong>the</strong>lial<br />
cells <strong>of</strong> m<strong>an</strong>y <strong>an</strong>imals, as Max Schulze, Pfitzner, Klein,<br />
Paulicki, Th. Cohn, <strong>an</strong>d o<strong>the</strong>rs have shown, are united by fine<br />
pro<strong>to</strong>plasmic processes much as are <strong>the</strong> cells <strong>of</strong> pl<strong>an</strong>ts, <strong>the</strong>refore<br />
<strong>the</strong> epi<strong>the</strong>lia are unicellular, for <strong>the</strong>ir pro<strong>to</strong>plasm is continuous.<br />
The same may be said for muscle cells (Werner <strong>an</strong>d<br />
Klecki), for connective tissue, for bone cells, for <strong>the</strong> developing<br />
mesoblast <strong>of</strong> Vertebrata (teste Sedgwick, Asshe<strong>to</strong>n, <strong>an</strong>d<br />
o<strong>the</strong>rs), for <strong>the</strong> mesoblast (mesenchyme) <strong>of</strong> trochospheres <strong>an</strong>d<br />
Mollusc<strong>an</strong> larvae (see particularly von Erl<strong>an</strong>ger), <strong>an</strong>d for m<strong>an</strong>y<br />
o<strong>the</strong>r tissues.<br />
Thus <strong>the</strong> inevitable result <strong>of</strong> <strong>an</strong> argument which is me<strong>an</strong>t