20.11.2013 Views

silica dust, crystalline, in the form of quartz or cristobalite - IARC ...

silica dust, crystalline, in the form of quartz or cristobalite - IARC ...

silica dust, crystalline, in the form of quartz or cristobalite - IARC ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>IARC</strong> MONOGRAPHS – 100C<br />

(US diatomaceous earth w<strong>or</strong>kers; F<strong>in</strong>nish and<br />

US granite w<strong>or</strong>kers; US <strong>in</strong><strong>dust</strong>rial sand w<strong>or</strong>kers;<br />

Ch<strong>in</strong>ese pottery w<strong>or</strong>kers, and t<strong>in</strong> and tungsten<br />

m<strong>in</strong>ers; and South African, Australian, and US<br />

gold m<strong>in</strong>ers). Occupation- and time-specific<br />

exposure estimates were ei<strong>the</strong>r adopted/adapted<br />

<strong>or</strong> developed f<strong>or</strong> each coh<strong>or</strong>t, and converted to<br />

milligrams per cubic metre (mg/m 3 ) respirable<br />

<strong>crystall<strong>in</strong>e</strong> <strong>silica</strong>. The median <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> average<br />

cumulative exposure to respirable <strong>crystall<strong>in</strong>e</strong><br />

<strong>silica</strong> ranged from 0.04 mg/m 3 f<strong>or</strong> US <strong>in</strong><strong>dust</strong>rial<br />

sand w<strong>or</strong>kers to 0.59 mg/m 3 f<strong>or</strong> F<strong>in</strong>nish granite<br />

w<strong>or</strong>kers. The coh<strong>or</strong>t-specific median <strong>of</strong> cumulative<br />

exposure ranged from 0.13 mg/m 3 –years f<strong>or</strong><br />

US <strong>in</strong><strong>dust</strong>rial sand w<strong>or</strong>kers to 11.37 mg/m 3 –years<br />

f<strong>or</strong> Australian gold m<strong>in</strong>ers.<br />

In a cross-sectional survey, Hai et al. (2001)<br />

determ<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>the</strong> levels <strong>of</strong> respirable nuisance and<br />

<strong>silica</strong> <strong>dust</strong>s to which refract<strong>or</strong>y brickw<strong>or</strong>kers<br />

were exposed at a company <strong>in</strong> Ha Noi, Viet<br />

Nam. Respirable <strong>dust</strong> levels were <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> range<br />

<strong>of</strong> 2.2–14.4 mg/m 3 at n<strong>in</strong>e sample sites. The<br />

estimated free <strong>silica</strong> content <strong>of</strong> <strong>dust</strong> was 3.5%<br />

f<strong>or</strong> unfired materials at <strong>the</strong> powder collect<strong>or</strong>s<br />

(n = 8 samples), and 11.4% <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> brick-clean<strong>in</strong>g<br />

area follow<strong>in</strong>g fir<strong>in</strong>g (n = 1 sample).<br />

Burgess (1998) <strong>in</strong>vestigated processes associated<br />

with occupational exposure to respirable<br />

<strong>crystall<strong>in</strong>e</strong> <strong>silica</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> British pottery <strong>in</strong><strong>dust</strong>ry<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g 1930–1995, and developed a quantitative<br />

job–exposure matrix. Exposure estimates were<br />

derived from 1390 air samples, <strong>the</strong> published<br />

literature, and unpublished rep<strong>or</strong>ts <strong>of</strong> <strong>dust</strong><br />

control <strong>in</strong>novations and process changes. In<br />

<strong>the</strong> matrix, daily 8-hour TWA airb<strong>or</strong>ne concentrations<br />

<strong>of</strong> respirable <strong>crystall<strong>in</strong>e</strong> <strong>silica</strong> ranged<br />

from 0.002 mg/m 3 f<strong>or</strong> pottery-supp<strong>or</strong>t activities<br />

per<strong>f<strong>or</strong>m</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1990s to 0.8 mg/m 3 f<strong>or</strong> fir<strong>in</strong>g<br />

activities <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1930s. Although exposure estimates<br />

with<strong>in</strong> decades varied, median concentrations<br />

f<strong>or</strong> all process categ<strong>or</strong>ies displayed an<br />

overall trend towards progressive reduction <strong>in</strong><br />

exposure dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> 65 year span.<br />

2. Cancer <strong>in</strong> Humans<br />

2.1 Cancer <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> lung<br />

In <strong>the</strong> previous <strong>IARC</strong> Monograph (<strong>IARC</strong>,<br />

1997) not all studies reviewed demonstrated an<br />

excess <strong>of</strong> cancer <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> lung and, given <strong>the</strong> wide<br />

range <strong>of</strong> populations and exposure circumstances<br />

studied, some non-uni<strong>f<strong>or</strong>m</strong>ity <strong>of</strong> results had been<br />

expected. However, overall, <strong>the</strong> epidemiological<br />

f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs at <strong>the</strong> time supp<strong>or</strong>ted an association<br />

between cancer <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> lung and <strong>in</strong>haled <strong>crystall<strong>in</strong>e</strong><br />

<strong>silica</strong> (α-<strong>quartz</strong> and <strong>cristobalite</strong>) result<strong>in</strong>g<br />

from occupational exposure.<br />

The current evaluation has a primary focus<br />

on studies that employed quantitative data on<br />

occupational exposures to <strong>crystall<strong>in</strong>e</strong> <strong>silica</strong> <strong>dust</strong><br />

(α-<strong>quartz</strong> and <strong>cristobalite</strong>). The establishment<br />

<strong>of</strong> exposure–response relationships not only<br />

provides critical evidence <strong>of</strong> causation, but <strong>the</strong><br />

availability <strong>of</strong> quantitative exposures on <strong>crystall<strong>in</strong>e</strong><br />

<strong>silica</strong> and o<strong>the</strong>r exposures <strong>of</strong> relevance<br />

facilitates <strong>the</strong> accurate assessment <strong>of</strong> exposure–<br />

response relationships <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> potential<br />

confounders. In addition to <strong>the</strong> focus on<br />

quantitative exposure–response relationships, a<br />

summary <strong>of</strong> f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs from eight published metaanalyses<br />

<strong>of</strong> lung cancer was also elab<strong>or</strong>ated. Of<br />

<strong>the</strong>se, <strong>the</strong> seven meta-analyses <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g absolute<br />

risk summarize <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong><strong>f<strong>or</strong>m</strong>ation from <strong>the</strong> many<br />

studies that did not consider quantitative exposure–response<br />

relationships, while <strong>the</strong> eighth is a<br />

meta-analysis <strong>of</strong> exposure-response.<br />

F<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs from coh<strong>or</strong>t studies are given<br />

<strong>in</strong> Table 2.1 available at http://monographs.<br />

iarc.fr/ENG/Monographs/vol100C/100C-08-<br />

Table2.1.pdf, and those f<strong>or</strong> <strong>the</strong> case–control<br />

studies are provided <strong>in</strong> Table 2.2 available at<br />

http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Monographs/<br />

vol100C/100C-08-Table2.2.pdf. Given that <strong>the</strong>re<br />

was concern by <strong>the</strong> previous <strong>IARC</strong> W<strong>or</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Group that different exposure sett<strong>in</strong>gs (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>the</strong> nature <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong><strong>dust</strong>ry and <strong>the</strong> <strong>crystall<strong>in</strong>e</strong><br />

<strong>silica</strong> polym<strong>or</strong>ph) may give rise to different (<strong>or</strong><br />

370

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!