silica dust, crystalline, in the form of quartz or cristobalite - IARC ...
silica dust, crystalline, in the form of quartz or cristobalite - IARC ...
silica dust, crystalline, in the form of quartz or cristobalite - IARC ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>IARC</strong> MONOGRAPHS – 100C<br />
2.1.8 Pooled analysis, meta-analyses, and<br />
o<strong>the</strong>r studies<br />
Steenland et al. (2001) rep<strong>or</strong>ted on a case–<br />
control analysis nested with<strong>in</strong> a pooled study <strong>of</strong><br />
data from ten coh<strong>or</strong>ts from a variety <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong><strong>dust</strong>ries<br />
and countries (Table 2.2 onl<strong>in</strong>e). It <strong>in</strong>cluded<br />
<strong>in</strong><strong>f<strong>or</strong>m</strong>ation on diatomaceous, granite, <strong>in</strong><strong>dust</strong>rial<br />
sand, and pottery w<strong>or</strong>kers, and w<strong>or</strong>kers <strong>in</strong> tungsten,<br />
t<strong>in</strong>, and gold m<strong>in</strong>es. Results from all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
studies had been previously published, although<br />
not all had <strong>or</strong>ig<strong>in</strong>ally employed quantitative estimates<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>crystall<strong>in</strong>e</strong> <strong>silica</strong> exposure; and f<strong>or</strong> half,<br />
<strong>the</strong> duration <strong>of</strong> follow-up had been extended. All<br />
<strong>in</strong>dices <strong>of</strong> cumulative <strong>crystall<strong>in</strong>e</strong> <strong>silica</strong> exposure<br />
(cumulative, unlagged and lagged; log cumulative,<br />
unlagged and lagged) showed highly significant<br />
trends with lung cancer risk (P < 0.0001), and<br />
average exposure demonstrated a less significant<br />
trend (P < 0.05). Of <strong>the</strong>se <strong>in</strong>dices, log cumulative<br />
exposure led to homogeneity <strong>in</strong> f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs across<br />
<strong>the</strong> coh<strong>or</strong>ts (P = 0.08 and 0.34 f<strong>or</strong> unlagged and<br />
15-year lag respectively). F<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs were similar<br />
f<strong>or</strong> <strong>the</strong> m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and non-m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g subgroups.<br />
No adjustment was made f<strong>or</strong> smok<strong>in</strong>g and<br />
o<strong>the</strong>r confounders, although it was noted that<br />
smok<strong>in</strong>g had previously been shown not to be<br />
a maj<strong>or</strong> confounder <strong>in</strong> five <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ten studies.<br />
Analyses <strong>of</strong> subsets <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> data omitt<strong>in</strong>g coh<strong>or</strong>ts<br />
with suspected o<strong>the</strong>r confounders (radon <strong>in</strong><br />
South African gold m<strong>in</strong>es, and arsenic <strong>or</strong> PAHs<br />
<strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese t<strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>ers and pottery w<strong>or</strong>kers) did<br />
not change <strong>the</strong> overall f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs. [The W<strong>or</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Group noted that <strong>the</strong> robustness <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs to<br />
exclusion <strong>of</strong> coh<strong>or</strong>ts with potential confounders<br />
from o<strong>the</strong>r occupational exposures <strong>in</strong>dicates that<br />
any confound<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual studies were<br />
unlikely to have had an impact on <strong>the</strong>ir f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
related to <strong>crystall<strong>in</strong>e</strong> <strong>silica</strong>.]<br />
The presence <strong>of</strong> silicosis <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>dividual is a<br />
biomarker <strong>of</strong> high exposure to <strong>crystall<strong>in</strong>e</strong> <strong>silica</strong><br />
<strong>dust</strong>. Acc<strong>or</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gly, studies <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividuals with<br />
silicosis have <strong>the</strong> potential to provide useful<br />
<strong>in</strong><strong>f<strong>or</strong>m</strong>ation on <strong>the</strong> lung cancer risk associated<br />
with exposure to <strong>crystall<strong>in</strong>e</strong> <strong>silica</strong>. Three metaanalyses<br />
have focused on <strong>the</strong> risk <strong>of</strong> lung cancer<br />
among <strong>in</strong>dividuals with silicosis (Smith et al.,<br />
1995; Tsuda et al., 1997; Lacasse et al., 2005). Erren<br />
et al. (2009) also provide summary <strong>in</strong><strong>f<strong>or</strong>m</strong>ation<br />
<strong>in</strong> an electronic supplement to <strong>the</strong>ir article. Four<br />
o<strong>the</strong>rs have looked at <strong>crystall<strong>in</strong>e</strong> <strong>silica</strong> exposure<br />
(<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g silicosis status unknown and those<br />
without silicosis; Steenland & Stayner, 1997;<br />
Kurihara & Wada, 2004; Pelucchi et al., 2006;<br />
Erren et al., 2009). The number <strong>of</strong> studies <strong>in</strong>cluded<br />
ranged from 11 <strong>in</strong> a meta-analysis focused on<br />
<strong>in</strong>dividuals without silicosis (Erren et al., 2009)<br />
to 43 (Pelucchi et al., 2006) <strong>in</strong> a study <strong>of</strong> those<br />
with and without silicosis. Reasons f<strong>or</strong> this variation<br />
<strong>in</strong>cluded: <strong>the</strong> publication date, <strong>the</strong> time<br />
period <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>terest, whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> study was focused<br />
on those with <strong>or</strong> without silicosis, <strong>the</strong> <strong>or</strong>ig<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g<br />
country <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> studies, and analysis-specific<br />
criteria. F<strong>or</strong> example, Steenland & Stayner (1997)<br />
rejected studies <strong>of</strong> m<strong>in</strong>ers and foundry w<strong>or</strong>kers<br />
on <strong>the</strong> assumption that <strong>the</strong>y had <strong>the</strong> greatest<br />
potential f<strong>or</strong> confound<strong>in</strong>g exposures, and Smith<br />
et al. (1995) rejected certa<strong>in</strong> studies <strong>the</strong>y deemed<br />
under <strong>or</strong> overestimated <strong>the</strong> risk <strong>of</strong> lung cancer.<br />
Overall, <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> total <strong>of</strong> 112 publications <strong>in</strong>cluded<br />
by one <strong>or</strong> m<strong>or</strong>e <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> seven meta-analyses, none<br />
were common to all analyses.<br />
The detailed results from <strong>the</strong> seven metaanalyses<br />
are shown <strong>in</strong> Table 2.3 available at<br />
http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Monographs/<br />
vol100C/100C-08-Table2.3.pdf. In brief, all<br />
analyses except f<strong>or</strong> those devoted to categ<strong>or</strong>ies<br />
without silicosis found an elevated lung cancer<br />
risk, whe<strong>the</strong>r occurr<strong>in</strong>g among those with<br />
silicosis <strong>or</strong> among <strong>crystall<strong>in</strong>e</strong>-<strong>silica</strong>-exposed<br />
w<strong>or</strong>kers, <strong>or</strong> aris<strong>in</strong>g from coh<strong>or</strong>t <strong>or</strong> case–control<br />
studies. [The W<strong>or</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g Group noted that studies<br />
that restrict <strong>the</strong>ir analysis to <strong>in</strong>dividuals without<br />
silicosis potentially limit <strong>the</strong>ir range <strong>of</strong> <strong>crystall<strong>in</strong>e</strong><br />
<strong>silica</strong> exposure, because <strong>in</strong>dividuals with <strong>the</strong><br />
highest exposures tend to be omitted. Limit<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>the</strong> range <strong>of</strong> exposure results <strong>in</strong> reduced power to<br />
detect associations.] Overall, <strong>the</strong> rate ratios were<br />
376