18.12.2013 Views

2 The CDF Experiment at Fermilab Contents - Harvard University ...

2 The CDF Experiment at Fermilab Contents - Harvard University ...

2 The CDF Experiment at Fermilab Contents - Harvard University ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Section 2: Run II Triggers 85<br />

for b-tags. <strong>The</strong> B group plans to make use of leptons with p T as low as 2 GeV/c. <strong>The</strong><br />

leptonic inform<strong>at</strong>ion is used <strong>at</strong> Level 1, which only reduces the r<strong>at</strong>e compared to our<br />

`default' (SVT-based) tagging option. At the Level 2, due to B meson semileptonic<br />

branching fractions, the lepton trigger is comparable to a trigger based on displaced<br />

tracks from SVT. <strong>The</strong> missing bit of inform<strong>at</strong>ion is the eect of the muon fakes and<br />

electron conversions (the inner detector has more m<strong>at</strong>ter in Run II, and the conversion<br />

r<strong>at</strong>e is expected to increase compared to Run I d<strong>at</strong>a). Student David Medvigy is also<br />

involved in this study.<br />

We envision a combined SVT-based and lepton-based trigger, th<strong>at</strong> uses the lepton info<br />

<strong>at</strong> Level 1 if it is available, and then meshes the leptonic and displaced-track tags <strong>at</strong><br />

Level 2. We plan to set the cuts on displacement(jd 0 j) and lepton p T so th<strong>at</strong> they are<br />

almost interchangeable, and in th<strong>at</strong> way dene one d<strong>at</strong>aset comprising of SVT-SVT,<br />

SVT-lepton and lepton-lepton b-tags.<br />

3. b-tagging algorithms <strong>at</strong> Level 3: our current work is based on two SECVTX tags<br />

<strong>at</strong> Level 3. However, we consider SECVTX to be `destructive', in a sense th<strong>at</strong> it has<br />

high purity <strong>at</strong> the expense of signal eciency. We would prefer to use an algorithm<br />

more ecient for the H + W=Z signal <strong>at</strong> Level 3, allowing for more maneuvering room<br />

oine.<br />

4. b-jet mass resolution: the di-jet mass resolution is crucial for the sensitivity to higgs<br />

signals. As discussed in the next section, advances there will improve the performance<br />

of this trigger, too.<br />

5. Oine analysis: <strong>The</strong>re are two levels of involvement:<br />

(a) Use existing Run I code and SECVTX tagging to upd<strong>at</strong>e the Run I limit in the<br />

light of the change in the trigger.<br />

(b) Upd<strong>at</strong>e the limit using the Run II software tools. This would also prepare us for<br />

the Run II d<strong>at</strong>a, and may feed back into the Level 3 b-tagging algorithms, which<br />

will also be based on the Run II software tools.<br />

In conclusion, although there are several technical issues th<strong>at</strong> still remain to be settled,<br />

we have veried th<strong>at</strong> the fundamental ideas behind this trigger are sound, and th<strong>at</strong> such a<br />

trigger is viable in Run II.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!