25.12.2013 Views

Metaphors from Alice in Wonderland illustrate firstly the ridiculous ...

Metaphors from Alice in Wonderland illustrate firstly the ridiculous ...

Metaphors from Alice in Wonderland illustrate firstly the ridiculous ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

It was impossible to comprehend <strong>the</strong> dynamics and creativity <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> each <strong>in</strong>dividual process of<br />

becom<strong>in</strong>g more conscious, but as my awareness of <strong>the</strong> transformed identity evolved – more<br />

“muchness” – it created an opportunity for personal consciousness and perspective. The essence is<br />

that as “I experienced”, I <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly knew who “I am”. I experience consciousness through <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>terpretation of my five sensory organs, as well as mental activities. Although I could use language<br />

to express what I experienced, I had an “<strong>in</strong>ner know<strong>in</strong>g” that precedes concepts or words (Luo,<br />

2009).<br />

In addition, I realised that consciousness <strong>in</strong>cludes <strong>the</strong> conscious experience of self-awareness,<br />

preference, emotion, remember<strong>in</strong>g, conceptual thought, <strong>in</strong>ner speech, mental imagery and<br />

exteroception as well as <strong>in</strong>teroception and sensory perception (Farth<strong>in</strong>g, 1992). My subjective and<br />

personal perceptions, discernment and apparitions, whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong>side or outside my body, contributed to<br />

my experience of consciousness. My personal consciousness contributed to <strong>the</strong> collective<br />

consciousness, enabl<strong>in</strong>g me to share <strong>the</strong> unify<strong>in</strong>g awareness that operates with<strong>in</strong> my community.<br />

By identify<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> characteristics of consciousness as subjectivity, changeability, <strong>in</strong>tentionality and<br />

selectivity (Farth<strong>in</strong>g, 1992), I recognised its various functions. I experienced that consciousness<br />

def<strong>in</strong>es; it sets <strong>the</strong> context and adapts by elim<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g vagueness, and it assimilates and edits<br />

conscious content to form analogies. I appreciate <strong>the</strong> creative functions of consciousness.<br />

Conclusion<br />

By my us<strong>in</strong>g a variety of visual texts as data and supportive <strong>the</strong>ories to confirm my reasons for<br />

juxtapos<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> specific data, <strong>the</strong> data became saturated and reliable. I stayed connected to <strong>the</strong> data<br />

and applied juxtapos<strong>in</strong>g to use and guide me towards literature and <strong>the</strong>ories that I o<strong>the</strong>rwise would<br />

not have used to triangulate my experiences and observations for validat<strong>in</strong>g my data.<br />

My subjective philosophy is that <strong>the</strong>re is not only one road that will lead to <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>ner life of <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>dividual l – <strong>the</strong> self or <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r; <strong>the</strong>refore, I comb<strong>in</strong>ed a wide range of <strong>in</strong>terconnected datacollection<br />

and <strong>in</strong>terpretive methods (Ell<strong>in</strong>gson & Ellis, 2008) to discover and explore and to give a<br />

detailed account of my auto-ethnographic journey with <strong>Alice</strong> <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> Underland to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Wonderland</strong><br />

of <strong>the</strong> UFS‟s renewed <strong>in</strong>stitutional Identity.<br />

I was constantly aware of <strong>the</strong> critiques of AE (Delamont, 2007; Mann<strong>in</strong>g, 2007) and questioned <strong>the</strong><br />

validity of <strong>the</strong>ir claims of egocentric self-<strong>in</strong>dulgence, unethical familiarity, experiential and nonanalytic<br />

personal knowledge. I found <strong>the</strong>se claims to bear value, but prefer to substantiate my labels<br />

with scientific <strong>the</strong>ories and f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs (Gobo, 2008; Hoffman, 2000; Polanyi, 1958).<br />

29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!