26.12.2013 Views

5. Morphology in Relation to Phonology

5. Morphology in Relation to Phonology

5. Morphology in Relation to Phonology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

F. Plank, <strong>Morphology</strong> I: <strong>5.</strong> <strong>Morphology</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Relation</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Phonology</strong> 2<br />

<strong>5.</strong>1. <strong>Morphology</strong> before phonology, step-by-step, hand-<strong>in</strong>-hand<br />

<strong>Morphology</strong> is responsible (<strong>in</strong> cooperation with the lexicon and syntax)<br />

for the expression of mean<strong>in</strong>gs. For their dist<strong>in</strong>ctive expression:<br />

l<strong>in</strong>guistic structures are systems of contrasts (e.g., PLURAL means<br />

someth<strong>in</strong>g different when part of a two-way or of a three-way system of<br />

NUMBER contrasts, SG - PL or SG - DU - PL).<br />

What phonology is responsible for is that these mean<strong>in</strong>gs, as expressible<br />

and dist<strong>in</strong>guishable courtesy of the lexicon (= basic units) and of<br />

morphology and syntax (= constructions) are (i) (easily) pronounceable<br />

and (ii) (easily) perceivable.<br />

It follows from this division of labour that morphology ought <strong>to</strong> have<br />

priority over phonology: first morphology (with lexicon and syntax)<br />

needs <strong>to</strong> provide forms-<strong>in</strong>-constructions, then phonology can see <strong>to</strong> it<br />

that they are (easily) pronounceable and perceivable.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!