5. Morphology in Relation to Phonology
5. Morphology in Relation to Phonology
5. Morphology in Relation to Phonology
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
F. Plank, <strong>Morphology</strong> I: <strong>5.</strong> <strong>Morphology</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Relation</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Phonology</strong> 2<br />
<strong>5.</strong>1. <strong>Morphology</strong> before phonology, step-by-step, hand-<strong>in</strong>-hand<br />
<strong>Morphology</strong> is responsible (<strong>in</strong> cooperation with the lexicon and syntax)<br />
for the expression of mean<strong>in</strong>gs. For their dist<strong>in</strong>ctive expression:<br />
l<strong>in</strong>guistic structures are systems of contrasts (e.g., PLURAL means<br />
someth<strong>in</strong>g different when part of a two-way or of a three-way system of<br />
NUMBER contrasts, SG - PL or SG - DU - PL).<br />
What phonology is responsible for is that these mean<strong>in</strong>gs, as expressible<br />
and dist<strong>in</strong>guishable courtesy of the lexicon (= basic units) and of<br />
morphology and syntax (= constructions) are (i) (easily) pronounceable<br />
and (ii) (easily) perceivable.<br />
It follows from this division of labour that morphology ought <strong>to</strong> have<br />
priority over phonology: first morphology (with lexicon and syntax)<br />
needs <strong>to</strong> provide forms-<strong>in</strong>-constructions, then phonology can see <strong>to</strong> it<br />
that they are (easily) pronounceable and perceivable.