26.12.2013 Views

5. Morphology in Relation to Phonology

5. Morphology in Relation to Phonology

5. Morphology in Relation to Phonology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

F. Plank, <strong>Morphology</strong> I: <strong>5.</strong> <strong>Morphology</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Relation</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Phonology</strong> 35<br />

bäc.ke.REI, bac.ke.REI:<br />

with -ei nouns are derived from nouns (Bäcker) or verbs (backen);<br />

the syllable conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g this suffix -ei attracts ma<strong>in</strong> stress.<br />

In such words the diphthong /ai/ has clearly a different status from that it<br />

has, e.g., <strong>in</strong> SAL.bei, PA.pa.gei, NAC.ke.dei, AL.ler.lei, which are words<br />

stressed accord<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> normal German stress rules (last syllable<br />

extrametrical; pars<strong>in</strong>g from right <strong>to</strong> left; moraic trochee) and where /ai/<br />

on its own has no mean<strong>in</strong>g;<br />

stress-attract<strong>in</strong>g -ei does have mean<strong>in</strong>g – <strong>in</strong> fact two mean<strong>in</strong>gs: 'place<br />

where a baker pursues his profession', 'constant pursuit of the activity of<br />

bak<strong>in</strong>g'.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!