31.12.2013 Views

Land Management Plan 2004 - 2050 Flinders University South ...

Land Management Plan 2004 - 2050 Flinders University South ...

Land Management Plan 2004 - 2050 Flinders University South ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Flinders</strong> <strong>University</strong> <strong>Land</strong> <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> <strong>Flinders</strong> <strong>University</strong><br />

<strong>2004</strong> - <strong>2050</strong> <strong>South</strong> Australia<br />

4.4 Catchment <strong>Management</strong><br />

There are four stormwater outlets from the suburban catchment of Bellevue Heights into the study area. The high<br />

velocity of flows that typically follows rainfall events has created gully erosion in the vicinity of these outlets, and<br />

requires management to prevent it becoming worse. The riparian zones downstream of each outlet have also<br />

become populated with both woody and herbaceous weeds.<br />

The Catchment Board has indicated their preferred treatment would be small detention basins, where possible, to<br />

reduce flow velocity and allow sediments to settle out prior to entering the creek system.<br />

The outlet at the eastern end of Precinct 6 is regarded as a priority, due to the severe erosion immediately<br />

downstream of the outlet. Revegetation utilising indigenous species (refer Appendix A), will need to follow the<br />

construction of detention basins - to assist in bank stabilisation.<br />

The outlet at the southern end of Precinct 6, discharging from The Boulevard, does have some erosion evident<br />

however, a detention basin is not considered necessary at this stage. Woody weed removal is recommended as part<br />

of the establishment of the fuel reduction zone along the boundary line. Revegetation, using aquatic macrophytes<br />

along the drainage line (refer Appendix A), will need to follow the weed removal - to assist in bank stabilisation.<br />

Within Precinct 7 there are two outlets at the eastern end, within 10 metres of each other. Woody weed removal has<br />

been undertaken in the vicinity of this area, however there are still numerous herbaceous weeds. Downstream of the<br />

outlets, the creek has exposed rocky sections. It has not been determined if this is naturally occurring or is the result<br />

of stormwater flow. Nevertheless, the terrain in this locality is not conducive to the construction of a stormwater<br />

detention basin therefore it is recommended that this area be revegetated using aquatic macrophytes from the list in<br />

Appendix A.<br />

On the eastern slope of Precinct 3 there is an outlet which discharges from Bellevue Drive. This is located in steep<br />

terrain and there is dense growth of herbaceous weeds immediately downstream. Due to the topography in this<br />

location, and the fact that erosion does not appear to be a problem, this outlet is not considered a priority. In the longterm<br />

it would be desirable to revegetate the area with indigenous riparian species.<br />

The provision of in stream<br />

habitat, through<br />

revegetation, has<br />

improved water quality<br />

and resulted in an<br />

increased occurrence of<br />

indigenous aquatic fauna,<br />

such as frogs.<br />

4.5 Pest Animals<br />

The management of pest animal species is considered to be a low priority for <strong>Flinders</strong> <strong>University</strong>. Pest animal issues<br />

do arise within the campus periodically; however, effective control requires a regional approach. The pest animal<br />

species that need to be monitored are predominantly foxes, rabbits and hares. Generally, populations of pest animals<br />

are kept at levels where their presence is not causing undue concern. It is unlikely that these species will ever be<br />

eradicated from the area, as they are common throughout the <strong>South</strong>ern Mount Lofty Ranges. Therefore, without the<br />

implementation of regional control strategies, these species would continue to re-infest the <strong>Flinders</strong> <strong>University</strong> area.<br />

Ongoing monitoring, and utilisation of appropriate control techniques when required, should be sufficient to prevent<br />

pest animals becoming a major management issue.<br />

4.6 Legislative Requirements<br />

There are a number of Acts, at both Commonwealth and State level that impact upon FUSA land. A summary of<br />

these and relevant policy documents and guidelines has been prepared and is provided as Appendix C, however a<br />

few of particular significance are briefly outlined below:<br />

Animal and <strong>Plan</strong>t Control (Agricultural and Other Purposes) Act 1986<br />

This Act provides for the control of animals and plants for the protection of agriculture and the environment and for<br />

the safety of the public. Species that are ‘proclaimed’ are required to be controlled by the property owner. There are<br />

several plant species that were observed within the project area that are listed as proclaimed under the Act within the<br />

Mitcham Council area these include; Olives, Aleppo Pines, Bridal Creeper, Salvation Jane and Boneseed. If an<br />

attempt is not made to control proclaimed plant species, the Animal and <strong>Plan</strong>t Control Commission or delegated<br />

authority (in this case Mitcham Council) has the power to enforce their control by either issuing fines or undertaking<br />

the control work and billing the land owner (refer<br />

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/sa/consol_act/aapcpaopa1986683/ ).<br />

Country Fires Act 1989<br />

The Act provides for the prevention, control and suppression of fires, and the protection of life and property in fire and<br />

other emergencies. Section 40 requires private landowners to take reasonable steps to protect property on the land<br />

from fire and to prevent or inhibit the outbreak of fire on the land, or the spread of fire through the land. It also permits<br />

the relevant authority (in this case Mitcham Council) to issue enforcement ‘clean-up’ notices. The Act does not<br />

prevent individuals from taking civil action against land owners or asset managers in the event they suffer damage or<br />

loss as a result of fire (refer http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/sa/consol_act/cfa1989182/ )<br />

Native Vegetation Act 1991<br />

The Act aims to provide incentives and assistance to landowners in relation to the preservation and enhancement of<br />

native vegetation and to control the clearance of native vegetation. The Act applies to land outside the Adelaide<br />

Metropolitan region (which excludes the Hills Face Zone) therefore all land east of the electricity easement, namely<br />

Precincts 6 and 7, are covered by the Act.<br />

Clearance of any native vegetation is prohibited under the Native Vegetation Act, 1991 unless there is an exemption<br />

that covers the clearance, such as for firebreaks, fuel reduction zones and track construction, or the Native<br />

Vegetation Council grants specific consent. It is recommended that consultation be undertaken with the Native<br />

Vegetation Council before any native vegetation is removed for the implementation of actions within this<br />

management plan. This includes clearance or disturbance of native vegetation for fuel reduction zones, access<br />

tracks and any other clearance of native vegetation that may be required. The Native Vegetation Council can then<br />

give advice and direction on what actions are exempt under the Act and what vegetation clearance or disturbance<br />

requires a clearance application to be submitted to the Native Vegetation Council (refer<br />

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/sa/consol_act/nva1991194/ ).<br />

⏐ AUGUST <strong>2004</strong> ⏐ PAGE 12

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!