Qualitative Online Feedback: Supply Chain Disclosure - Global ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Comment Constituency Region Reporting Relationship Content Comment HR2 These disclosures do not make sense – new suppliers / partners would not be appointed without performance expectations following screening, and new suppliers cannot be “not selected” (does it mean proposed suppliers?) 239 1848 __• __ Discrimination • Forced and compulsory • Insert Content Comment • PEOPLE WITH DISABILITY RIGHTS RATIONALE: The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (2006), ratified so far by the UE and more than 100 countries individually considers non-discrimination, equal opportunities and social inclusion of people with disabilities a matter of human rights and should therefore be taken into account. (http://www.un.org/disabilities/) 242 1869 ASPECT: SCREENING AND ASSESSMENT __CORE G4 11 __ Percentage of existing suppliers and CORE G4 11 Comment Content Comment This is a much to detailed indicator. It is not possible for bigger organizations / corporations to collect these data. Our company counts nearly 10.000 suppliers worldwide! 242 1869-1871 __CORE G4 11 Percentage of existing suppliers and other business partner... CORE G4 11 Percentage of existing suppliers and other business partners identified as having actual and potential adverse human rights impacts assessed on human rights performance, and actions taken Comment Wording Comment Not relevant in Indian context where written confirmation of local laws can be taken. Will increase costs significantly. 242 1869-1871 __CORE G4 11 Percentage of existing suppliers and other business partner... CORE G4 11 Percentage of existing suppliers and other business partners identified as having actual and potential adverse human rights impacts assessed on human rights performance, and actions taken Comment Content Comment G4.5 & 4.6 & 4.7 Not clear why these indicators focus on only environmental performance and impacts for suppliers, and for grievances, rather than wider sustainability performance including health and safety, social responsibility, business ethics, product Civil Society Organization Europe Report Reader Work to promote and enhance the disability disclosure in sustainability reports Business Europe Reporter Business Asia Reporter Business Northern America Reporter Second G4 Public Comment Period: Submissions Document 8 of 12 – Qualitative Online Feedback: Supply Chain Disclosure Page 1563 of 2491
Comment Constituency Region Reporting Relationship quality etc. The same argument applies to G4.8, G4.9 and G4.10 which parallel the environmental indicators for labour practices, and for human rights in G4.11, HR2 and HR11, and for G4.12, G4.13 and G4.14 for society-related performance. In general organisations should not manage these separately. It should be possible to reduce these to only three or even two more insightful indicators. 243 1918 limited to: • Child labor __• __ Discrimination • Forced and compulsory • Insert Content Comment • PEOPLE WITH DISABILITY RIGHTS RATIONALE: The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (2006), ratified so far by the UE and more than 100 countries individually considers non-discrimination, equal opportunities and social inclusion of people with disabilities a matter of human rights and should therefore be taken into account. (http://www.un.org/disabilities/) 243 1935-1936 __performance expectations as a requirement for maintaining a relationsh... performance expectations as a requirement for maintaining a relationship with a supplier or other business partner. Comment Content Comment We would like to add that these expectations have to be at least in accordance with the organization´s (own) internal expectations (mission, vision, value statement) - otherwise the organization is not authentic. 247 1983 REMEDIATION CORE HR11 Number of __grievances __ about human rights impacts filed, grievances Comment Content Comment This indicator suggests that a high number of grievances means low compliance with requested standards. This is unfortunately far from reality. Zero grievances could for example mean that grievances are surpressed or information channels are limited. In turn, high numbers of grievances i.e. from workers directed to supplier management may result from an open and constructive dialogue between workers and their representatives. Additionally, grievances issued by campaign organisations are more likely to target wellknown companies rather than unknown brands. No. of detected non-compliances (either resulting from a grievance procedure or through monitoring procedures) is a far more reasonable measurement. 247 1983-1984 __CORE HR11 Number of grievances about human rights impacts filed, addr... CORE HR11 Number of grievances about human rights impacts filed, addressed, and resolved through formal grievance mechanisms Civil Society Organization Mediating Institution Europe Europe Report Reader Work to promote and enhance the disability disclosure in sustainability reports Consultant Report Reader for academic purposes Business Europe Reporter Business Northern America Reporter Second G4 Public Comment Period: Submissions Document 8 of 12 – Qualitative Online Feedback: Supply Chain Disclosure Page 1564 of 2491
Page 1 and 2:
G4 DEVELOPMENT Second G4 Public Com
Page 3 and 4:
Documents Contents Page Second G4 P
Page 5 and 6:
As defined in the GRI Due Process,
Page 7 and 8:
process consisted of (1) a map of t
Page 9 and 10:
The proposed revisions included:
Page 11 and 12:
them as online or offline, based on
Page 13 and 14:
8.3 QUESTIONS FOR GENERAL COMMENT:
Page 15 and 16:
Comment Constituency Region Reporti
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
PERSONAL SUBMISSIONS Comment Consti
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97:
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112:
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
SUPPLY CHAIN Q5 Q5) Do you consider
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165:
Page 166 and 167:
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
Page 172 and 173:
Page 174 and 175:
Page 176 and 177:
Page 178 and 179:
Page 180 and 181:
Page 182 and 183:
Page 184 and 185:
Page 186 and 187:
Page 188 and 189:
Page 190 and 191:
Page 192 and 193:
Page 194 and 195:
8.4 DOCUMENT REVIEW: SUPPLY CHAIN F
Page 196 and 197:
Page 198 and 199:
Page 200 and 201:
Page 202 and 203:
Page 204 and 205:
Page 206 and 207:
Page 208 and 209:
Page 210 and 211:
Page 212 and 213:
Page 214 and 215:
Page 216 and 217:
Page 218 and 219:
Page 220 and 221:
Page 222 and 223:
Page 224 and 225:
Page 226 and 227:
Page 228 and 229:
Page 230 and 231:
Page 232 and 233:
Page 234 and 235:
Page 236 and 237:
Page 238 and 239:
Page 240 and 241:
Page 242 and 243:
Page 244 and 245:
Page 246 and 247:
Page 248 and 249:
Page 250 and 251:
Page 252 and 253:
Page 254 and 255:
Page 256 and 257:
Page 258 and 259:
Page 260 and 261:
Page 262 and 263:
Page 264 and 265:
Page 266 and 267:
Page 268 and 269:
Page 270 and 271:
Page 272 and 273:
Page 274 and 275:
Page 276 and 277:
Page 278 and 279:
Page 280 and 281:
Page 282 and 283:
Page 284 and 285:
Page 286 and 287:
Page 288 and 289:
Page 290 and 291:
Page 292 and 293:
Page 294 and 295:
Page 296 and 297:
Page 298 and 299:
Page 300 and 301:
Page 302 and 303:
Page 304 and 305:
Page 306 and 307:
Page 308 and 309:
Page 310 and 311:
Page 312 and 313:
Page 314 and 315:
Page 316 and 317:
Page 318 and 319:
Page 320 and 321:
Page 322 and 323:
Page 324 and 325:
Page 326 and 327:
Page 328 and 329:
Page 330 and 331:
Page 332 and 333:
Page 334 and 335:
Page 336 and 337:
Page 338 and 339:
Page 340 and 341:
Page 342 and 343:
Page 344 and 345:
Page 346 and 347:
Page 348 and 349:
Page 350 and 351:
Page 352 and 353:
Page 354 and 355:
Page 356 and 357:
Page 358 and 359:
Page 360 and 361:
Page 362 and 363:
Page 364 and 365:
Page 366 and 367:
Page 368 and 369:
Page 370 and 371: Comment Constituency Region Reporti
Page 432 and 433: PERSONAL SUBMISSIONS Comment Consti
Page 470:
Global Reporting Initiative PO Box
show all

Qualitative Online Feedback: Supply Chain Disclosure - Global ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?