EIS-0113_Section_9 - Hanford Site

More documents

Recommendations

Info

a 3.4.3.1 2.1.1 3.3.1.1 RECEIVED DOE-RL JUL 1 4 M pdb0' 063 WMDIVI $^ ON P' 3 ur;4yL.T.d;a} iw . haznrc(s, h1e h>d .Wr ia,s{s .F' r cîadiow as1a.{;: jiGe cowsvR ^rncaf a». o-to;,1t-+ c Jrk 6 Role, e, s;.^.^+iy de>;7i. iC>t GCC;c\ew`5 LL we..\d. .cccr. -11we leroac(er issue ,5 ((e ( •ducd o x wuc(e.f, tw.s{-e wIeick eer Po.\.rd{ec 't4.c er.lalea.. X 5-6rr ff. -T,, V..0E. .«d Arne r• ¢ne;es .,,,a sk- ..d lress `f(.e ;sswe aF redvoi w=.s{t 2.5.6 .e skew zF ser..LXear akrgts i e4K!raffy ee , er y y .r {xec^ `Yne...,ae e:'.duce n^c6.. 5{ Merl t S+it lir-a.. wa. seem {'o.. We. Lea' wave .. wask-_ 40TT A- jgaSL't'•r^; Ir 2.5.6 (11-V uAi dL gl,5e Nn k iks Ekaa,^rd. {i c;1e(y pt 01oSad. We also feel each action in the disposal process must not preclude further actions which might be desireabie for other aspects of the entire system. Furthermore, an adequate tracer and monitoring system should be established which should extend into the postclpsure period for a long time. One of our concerns is that the U.S. DOE must use the same environmental standards as the Nuclear Waste Policy Act intended and not bypass them under the Atomic Energy Act. Defense waste standards should comply with state and federal requirements to assure protection of .groundwater quality. League members agree that the solution should be as cost effective as passible, but the cast issue should not determine the choice of the disposal alternative. In that regard, we are gravely concerned about the tone of the draft EIS which seems biased against the geologic disposal alternative due to cost. In reviewing the draft EIS. and co mm ents of others, we concur with the states' of Oregon and Washington , requesting more information an the four alternatives proposed and inclusion of discussin g of the other 23 disposal methods not discussed. For example. Washington's Department of Social and Health Services Office of Radiation Protection in its draft review paper questions the reliability of the 3.3.4.2 2.4.1.1 2.2.4 3.3.1.2 3.3.5.2
111: 64 My League of Women Voters of Oregonduly 10, 1906 Page 2 006`( Testimony before V.S. DOE, Portland, OR Re: Draft EIS Disposal of Hanford Defense Waste multi-layer protective barrier system for the shallow burial sites. The concern is with water intrusion due to increased irrigation in the future or change in the water level of the Columbia River Basin from the removal of dams, or weather pattern changes such as an arid spell killing the vegetation on the barrier and wind removing the soil. Also, consider the tiny ant. Remember the song, 'Whoops, 3 .5.1. 10 1 there goes another rubber tree plant?" The Washington agency points out that already in two different locations in the 200 Area harvester ants and termites have burrowed into waste and resurfaced radioactivity. 06.b(S^ Aid f9P6 to V 3.5.6.40 More data needs to be collected concerning groundwater flow and groundwater contamination risks due to activities over the very long term, such as seismic events, flooding, climatic changes, drilling far gas and other resources, and increased human and animal activity. We have concerns about the coordination of all facets of transportation of 3 .4.2.24 wastes; such as lines of authority, responsibility, procedures, enforcement of regulations, routes, emergency procedures, funding of equipment, training of personnel, safety of equipment, enforcement of security measures, emergency stations, and risks due to hazardous weather, to mention same. The League of Women Voters has a deep concern over the recent decision to abandon the search for a second repository in the East. We feel it may "color" the decision to stabilize . in place the defense wastes at Hanford rather than removal to a repository. It could have a profound Influence on the decision to site 3 . 3. 2. 1 the commerci al repository at Hanford. It could affect the design and size of the co mm ercial repository due to co mm ingling It is imperative that all of the ongoing production activit y s at Hanford producing wastes, as well as the "con-retrievable- low level, transuranic, and hazardous chemical wastes on the site be factored into the system and should be thoroughly discussed in an EIS. Furthermore, the E IS must address the impact permanent waste disposal at Hanford would have an the cultural activities of the Yakima Indian Nation and the 2 . 4 . 2 . 1 other two affected tribes. 2 .2.1 Finally, the League of Women Voters of Oregon believes it is the responsibility of the federal government to take all the time, testing, resources, expertise, and discussion necessary to do the job right, because the social, environmental, and economic well-being of the region is at stake. The people of Oregon want to be assured that our agricultural, recreational, and industrial economy will continue to flourish- RECEWFL) DCE-RL Kristine Hudson, Presidenti UL 1 4 1986 Portland, a97221 OR WMDIVISION Norma dean Gerund -Imalloia Re, . Mtn rBlvdk Force Lake Oswego, OR 97034 c yQi n. rG:^t ?' A c ^/`pt G2.6^ t c[*îw^Y 2.5.6 % yrsgA>
Page 1 and 2:
AR TARGET SHEET The following docum
Page 3:
COYER SHEET RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: U.S
Page 6 and 7:
contained comments regarding its pr
Page 8 and 9:
'Tel, handling container; previousl
Page 10 and 11:
Comment Letter No. Reviewer Affilia
Page 12 and 13:
Comment Letter No. . Reviewer Affil
Page 14 and 15:
I Comment Letter No. Reviewer Affil
Page 16 and 17:
II Comment Letter No. Rev iewer Aff
Page 18 and 19:
Page 20 and 21:
Page 22 and 23:
Page 25 and 26:
Processing of Written Continents 1.
Page 27 and 28:
s a 10 4 0 1 001 001 N MG? ], "86 R
Page 29 and 30:
Ea --Z -- 003 004 oea a.nn,om 4u'RR
Page 31 and 32:
,y I F 'S. on ^ g "' 4d '.+A 0 0®4
Page 33 and 34:
• t V RECEIVED DOE-RL 005 Mr. Ric
Page 35 and 36:
$ 3 006 007 doe/ too 7 `7 CITY OF K
Page 37 and 38:
J A ^^ $„ 3§ 009 010 /6 RECEIVED
Page 39 and 40:
Oil RECEIVEu DOE-RL JUL 8 10 012 De
Page 41 and 42:
C 8 4 K y CJl 3.3.2.1 Efiec[ an O[h
Page 43 and 44:
gg MW r 2. Comsenta on Lran Environ
Page 45 and 46:
9 015 016 U V/,9 00 i t. R.R. Mot H
Page 47 and 48:
€ - UK 0.1e 001f tt • 115 Locus
Page 49 and 50:
0 4 2 6 zL' 021 021 6c RECEIVED DOE
Page 51 and 52:
0 N U1 023 0"2 Letter in lien of as
Page 53 and 54:
024 025 RE CEIVED DDE -1l,,A C,^.1
Page 55 and 56:
"a 3 q 3 , a ^F sy 025 025 pers REC
Page 57 and 58:
02 7 1 s W U.S.0epartment of Energy
Page 59 and 60:
.j 2 a tN +1 \!i ^: J 031 2 .1. 1 I
Page 61 and 62:
033 033 31The vast majority of dual
Page 63 and 64:
m ®33 Fixing the Problumis) Year 1
Page 65 and 66:
1 035 036 RECEIVED DC' .. _ L 9d//f
Page 67 and 68:
fi ig ,- ^5 a m 1 Js W CO30 TTSalHO
Page 69 and 70: k .^ ij is BE ' 3 Inland Empire Reg
Page 71 and 72: £ 4 5 Yi l:I T g pD43 MQ'p ^TT EC
Page 73 and 74: € f^ »y § ^ o BE ME à:{ HE HON
Page 75 and 76: 0 4 044 4 CJl 1-^ 3 of." tcE'-iVED
Page 77 and 78: ss. M 0044 J. RECEIVED DQE-RL JUL 1
Page 79 and 80: am UK UT 2.3.2.9 2.2.7 2.1.1 REGLIV
Page 81 and 82: sm UI 6641. RECENEU pUE-RL IUL 14 1
Page 83 and 84: 4 2 Ef. •. B91 Ln W 3.3.2.2 3 .3.
Page 85 and 86: ME 04°7 TESTIMONY ON HANFORD N-WAS
Page 87 and 88: E^g ^ d F k 1 f5 £"3 U:, 049 M W 2
Page 89 and 90: c 049 049 0Cn 0040 RECEIVED DOE-RL
Page 91 and 92: J M 051 V 2.5.6 page 2 Morgan July
Page 93 and 94: z 052 053 RECEIVED, DO E-RL JUL 14
Page 95 and 96: Im 053 3 RECEIVED DOEAL OREGON POSI
Page 97 and 98: F f.. WC 053 3 .3.5.3 RECEIVED DOE-
Page 99 and 100: 055 d ll%7C a.vvâ- .;1c Fcw wa^sv
Page 101 and 102: a f 8° 3 _A7 ej is M69 Sf M[SR1' O
Page 103 and 104: 05! ^9 Chairman, Subcommittee on Ge
Page 105 and 106: 05'7 057 Page Five RECEIVED DDE-RL
Page 107 and 108: 1 t 6 05'7 05'7 Page Nine RECEIVED
Page 109 and 110: 0 z 05'7 05'7 Page Thirteen RECEIVE
Page 111 and 112: 9 ra am BTi:rif ;.^.EiVc^ Cc-RL [oa
Page 113 and 114: aw RECEIVED COE-RL JUL 1 A 1986 WM
Page 115 and 116: El i 1 1 The OS ME moat ow0 up to t
Page 117 and 118: .rte M OG1 A fiscal year 1988 budge
Page 119: 3 ^ a 4 9 a DI OG3 V v •F c N v L
Page 123 and 124: 9- n, a y 067 M& E D ID t? Indeed,
Page 125 and 126: $'a s r3 - 4 i S + 'n 0 ^_1a e d ^-
Page 127 and 128: ^.^' 0 7® 0170 RECE VEU DOE-RL REC
Page 129 and 130: 8 Is Page6 WH RECEIVED DOE.RL JUL 1
Page 131 and 132: :l p 071 071 1— CD V 3.1.4.5 J 3.
Page 133 and 134: 0 72 1 2 0'72 H C) O ID ^/ Y AffAff
Page 135 and 136: i fr F ti 1 074 0'74 H RECEIVED DOE
Page 137 and 138: F a @ k ^Jg f' `f j ?y xt € 75 M
Page 139 and 140: 1 0 HAI 07'7 078 JUL 18 1986 0611 I
Page 141 and 142: € 78 wool N d 3.3.5.7 RECEIVED DO
Page 143 and 144: 2 A rim 0 # 5 x ME o1 _ Raebb Pat-W
Page 145 and 146: 081 RECEIVED DDE-RL JULIB1906 01 Co
Page 147 and 148: 4 7 mm 2.2..3 `7 „ u,/z', 3 o.,^.
Page 149 and 150: 1 u f¢^$y Y$ q{ 3a $ E 4 ^^ 4? Yq
Page 151 and 152: CIE M 086 S^nr . Le ^ / ^ `r'dtl2 H
Page 153 and 154: 1' _ k e .. §} ate¢ ,^ Ell N.=CEI
Page 155 and 156: M 1 t 2.3.1.14 3 .3.1.1 2.1.9 Mary
Page 157 and 158: t^ 092 093 Olympia, July 14. 19 Wa.
Page 159 and 160: 7 - Ej 09 _ - oog17 Q97 9052 39th A
Page 161 and 162: . '^ ,. ^ ^ std a 1':p 099 100 July
Page 163 and 164: n P F 1 102 103 I^ RECEIVED DOEAL .
Page 165 and 166: - 3 n fi ..i 0 ^ c 33441. -'2. 1 "
Page 167 and 168: ON Im \4k16 Sb 3 '^-6\ WA RECEIVED
Page 169 and 170: 4, Y^ EM 107 108 2 .1 WE has violat
Page 171 and 172:
D k ^wT 1W IM RECEIVED DOERL keC FI
Page 173 and 174:
110 111 3.2.6.3 2.5.1 2.5.1 3.3.1.1
Page 175 and 176:
e`4 ^ 3 fr8 ^^ k 3 xp U .,y1 Ill il
Page 177 and 178:
M -15 RECEIVED DOE-RL JUt22 OSS aiM
Page 179 and 180:
e RECEIVED DOE-RL JUL 22 1986 t0lb
Page 181 and 182:
LM . . Hl V continue to cause. nur.
Page 183 and 184:
a,1i 5 q.d 120 nu 3.5.5.28 3.3.2.1
Page 185 and 186:
3.3.5.4 3.3.4.2 2.5.6 121 RECEIVED
Page 187 and 188:
d ! d a 5 6 9_ :^v`s Im F_m FY "'L
Page 189 and 190:
d m 125 s(fllEm61r Pap- TM Pabkc 1A
Page 191 and 192:
x 8 ^ f ti r^ ' 3 ^ 4g L.';;., 2'7
Page 193 and 194:
3 .. g g jky Sw 6 128 Page 3 - RECE
Page 195 and 196:
N a :. S 1 29 V N 2.5.5 2.2.14 2.2.
Page 197 and 198:
•1 3 J ' ¢ I 6 130 1130 RECEIVED
Page 199 and 200:
s Ì V t;1) 133 V OF Okk Dogln CmM
Page 201 and 202:
_ y ou op } op o uopeaaua8 a ]nF a
Page 203 and 204:
G 4 i `; F4 Y7 136 13'7 V 2.5.6 2.2
Page 205 and 206:
51 0 13 19 DO W F-' 3.3.3.1 Th9 Ove
Page 207 and 208:
d 3 a. Hou MM NECE-0 !?OE-RL Holton
Page 209 and 210:
13 .4A RECEIVED DOE-RL 3.1.2.5 3.1.
Page 211 and 212:
is 443 143 N W V 3.5.5.28 3.3.2.1 R
Page 213 and 214:
fi e T i 8 # ^'^ ^ I^ 5 a x ?'2. ea
Page 215 and 216:
3%_ 3 —ie v^ F f ,lo1075-94 #,1 1
Page 217 and 218:
147 147 3.3:5,5 RECEPr--D rJOE-RL C
Page 219 and 220:
M 11/7 '14'7 .,ÊccnAIZ23 ÔE-RL ou
Page 221 and 222:
Es 14 M0 RECEIVED DCE-RL 3.1.3.26 3
Page 223 and 224:
e"_4 a 2 Is 51 F-' LD ro N 4- 4-i C
show all

EIS-0113_Section_9 - Hanford Site

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?