EIS-0113_Section_9 - Hanford Site
EIS-0113_Section_9 - Hanford Site
EIS-0113_Section_9 - Hanford Site
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
e"_4 a<br />
2<br />
Is<br />
51<br />
F-'<br />
LD<br />
ro<br />
N<br />
4-<br />
4-i<br />
C<br />
O<br />
ro<br />
•r<br />
C<br />
E<br />
OUO<br />
s<br />
RECEIVED UOERL<br />
S.H. Leroy<br />
U.s. Department Of Energy JUL 31 1988-<br />
Public Affairs<br />
P.D. So. 550<br />
HIM DIVISION<br />
Richland, WA 99352<br />
Department of energy:<br />
A few Comment. an the Defense Waste D<strong>EIS</strong> produced by the<br />
DOE.<br />
The world's largest storehouse of radioactive are<br />
containing a. amount comparable to all the fall-out that has<br />
even reach this .planet is located in the pacific northwest<br />
an the banks of the Columbia River.<br />
On these rolling basalt hills, the Dept, of Defense(War)<br />
laid claim to 570 square miles of territory in 1941 for the<br />
,reduction of the world's first genocide weapons known to<br />
mankind. This <strong>Hanford</strong> .Military Reservation is still making<br />
war on the health of the surrounding environment.<br />
The by-products of the government's 40 year history are<br />
immense amounts of waste -- some of this waste so<br />
radioactive i. rill be around for 500,000 years. The<br />
governments r^cord in a Ear. cry from resolving the problem<br />
of what to do with all this toxic and highly radioactive<br />
waste.<br />
A partial inventory of the waste at <strong>Hanford</strong> one will finds<br />
-135 million gallons of high-level liquid waste<br />
produced since 1944 during reprocessing of uranium fuel<br />
cells to remove plutonium for nuclear weapons. This waste<br />
contains dozens of deadly radioactive isotopes.<br />
-some .200 billion gallons of low and intermediate<br />
liquid waste have been dumped into ponds or discharged into<br />
the soil in underground drainfields. Some of this waste<br />
contains radioactive isotopes with half-lives of 4.5 billion<br />
yearn has reached the the water table under the Sandford<br />
reservation.<br />
-another 5 million plus cubic feet of solid radioactive<br />
waste consisting of refuse and contaminated equipment are<br />
stored in covered trenches at<strong>Hanford</strong>. This practice is<br />
considered permanent disposal of these waste by the DOE. I<br />
consider this a -nuclear nitwit" version of "out of sitar<br />
out of mind' .<br />
-from the PURRS ,last the DOE dempe 9 billion. of toxic<br />
and radioactive waste by-products into cribs per year. This<br />
practice has gone co mbated for years.<br />
Eesfdes these Particular practices of the last 40 years, the<br />
American public has to endur consistent subversion of<br />
information, lying, and deceit from the government and the<br />
WE at the Sandford Nuclear Reservation.<br />
The.gevernments' secrecy policy on radiation mistakes is the<br />
Same now as it was decades ago. The AEC withheld<br />
information about radioactive liquid that had leaked out of<br />
its' underground storage tanks at Sandford nuclear<br />
installation. in a January 1959 subcommittee of the joint<br />
committee on atomic energy, a general electric official<br />
responsible for managing <strong>Hanford</strong>'s waste testified "no<br />
environmental hazard will exist as long as the tanks<br />
maintained their integrity---we have never detected a leak<br />
from any of these tank, so that we are I. turn persuaded<br />
that none has ever leaked". A year later the AEC asserted<br />
in its annual report that 'waste problems have proved<br />
completely manageable." The fact remains the <strong>Hanford</strong> tanks<br />
had started leaking two years earlier, in 1958, the public<br />
did not learn that <strong>Hanford</strong>-. tanks Were leaking until years<br />
later. Other tank leaks at unnoticed for weeks. Some of<br />
thee. leak. were 2000 gallon. , but a 1973leaked dumped<br />
115,000 gallon. of high level wset. into the soil. Total<br />
releases have been 454,000 gallons or more. Are the now<br />
double-walled stainleea steel tanks which store this highly<br />
radioactive waste.. security to p revent this highly<br />
carcinogenic fzem getting into the environment? i do not<br />
think the tanks are safe..<br />
On the subject of permissible levels of radiation, the<br />
government is consistent in discrediting and terminating<br />
research project. that may suggest all is not as well as<br />
claimed. Dr. Samuel Milhan Jr. study of more than 500,000<br />
males who died in the state from 1950. to 1971 concluded that<br />
workers at the hanford nuclear plant were more likely to die<br />
of cancer thanother Washington state males. Dr. Milhan<br />
eventually lost the funding for continued research.<br />
The government.' behavior of concealing mistake.{ issueing<br />
misleading statements, repudiation of report s that disease<br />
And death may be attributed to radiation doses, and<br />
intolerances to dissent with the nuclear indumtry must<br />
change coarse. For the public distrust is to great an<br />
obstacle to overcome.<br />
Why le it the public was not informed of the December 2,<br />
1949 discharge of 5,500 curiae of 1-131 an iodine isotope<br />
which concentrates in human thyroid p ... ibly causing massive<br />
functional damage and later . yielding thyroid moduITS and<br />
canner. By camper :son, a single release of 15 curies of<br />
2.5.5<br />
2.2.12<br />
3.1.4.28<br />
2.5.5<br />
RECEN,i3 rn -RL<br />
•^n^--x'1986 p^5^<br />
WMOIVISION