06.01.2014 Views

EIS-0113_Section_9 - Hanford Site

EIS-0113_Section_9 - Hanford Site

EIS-0113_Section_9 - Hanford Site

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

e"_4 a<br />

2<br />

Is<br />

51<br />

F-'<br />

LD<br />

ro<br />

N<br />

4-<br />

4-i<br />

C<br />

O<br />

ro<br />

•r<br />

C<br />

E<br />

OUO<br />

s<br />

RECEIVED UOERL<br />

S.H. Leroy<br />

U.s. Department Of Energy JUL 31 1988-<br />

Public Affairs<br />

P.D. So. 550<br />

HIM DIVISION<br />

Richland, WA 99352<br />

Department of energy:<br />

A few Comment. an the Defense Waste D<strong>EIS</strong> produced by the<br />

DOE.<br />

The world's largest storehouse of radioactive are<br />

containing a. amount comparable to all the fall-out that has<br />

even reach this .planet is located in the pacific northwest<br />

an the banks of the Columbia River.<br />

On these rolling basalt hills, the Dept, of Defense(War)<br />

laid claim to 570 square miles of territory in 1941 for the<br />

,reduction of the world's first genocide weapons known to<br />

mankind. This <strong>Hanford</strong> .Military Reservation is still making<br />

war on the health of the surrounding environment.<br />

The by-products of the government's 40 year history are<br />

immense amounts of waste -- some of this waste so<br />

radioactive i. rill be around for 500,000 years. The<br />

governments r^cord in a Ear. cry from resolving the problem<br />

of what to do with all this toxic and highly radioactive<br />

waste.<br />

A partial inventory of the waste at <strong>Hanford</strong> one will finds<br />

-135 million gallons of high-level liquid waste<br />

produced since 1944 during reprocessing of uranium fuel<br />

cells to remove plutonium for nuclear weapons. This waste<br />

contains dozens of deadly radioactive isotopes.<br />

-some .200 billion gallons of low and intermediate<br />

liquid waste have been dumped into ponds or discharged into<br />

the soil in underground drainfields. Some of this waste<br />

contains radioactive isotopes with half-lives of 4.5 billion<br />

yearn has reached the the water table under the Sandford<br />

reservation.<br />

-another 5 million plus cubic feet of solid radioactive<br />

waste consisting of refuse and contaminated equipment are<br />

stored in covered trenches at<strong>Hanford</strong>. This practice is<br />

considered permanent disposal of these waste by the DOE. I<br />

consider this a -nuclear nitwit" version of "out of sitar<br />

out of mind' .<br />

-from the PURRS ,last the DOE dempe 9 billion. of toxic<br />

and radioactive waste by-products into cribs per year. This<br />

practice has gone co mbated for years.<br />

Eesfdes these Particular practices of the last 40 years, the<br />

American public has to endur consistent subversion of<br />

information, lying, and deceit from the government and the<br />

WE at the Sandford Nuclear Reservation.<br />

The.gevernments' secrecy policy on radiation mistakes is the<br />

Same now as it was decades ago. The AEC withheld<br />

information about radioactive liquid that had leaked out of<br />

its' underground storage tanks at Sandford nuclear<br />

installation. in a January 1959 subcommittee of the joint<br />

committee on atomic energy, a general electric official<br />

responsible for managing <strong>Hanford</strong>'s waste testified "no<br />

environmental hazard will exist as long as the tanks<br />

maintained their integrity---we have never detected a leak<br />

from any of these tank, so that we are I. turn persuaded<br />

that none has ever leaked". A year later the AEC asserted<br />

in its annual report that 'waste problems have proved<br />

completely manageable." The fact remains the <strong>Hanford</strong> tanks<br />

had started leaking two years earlier, in 1958, the public<br />

did not learn that <strong>Hanford</strong>-. tanks Were leaking until years<br />

later. Other tank leaks at unnoticed for weeks. Some of<br />

thee. leak. were 2000 gallon. , but a 1973leaked dumped<br />

115,000 gallon. of high level wset. into the soil. Total<br />

releases have been 454,000 gallons or more. Are the now<br />

double-walled stainleea steel tanks which store this highly<br />

radioactive waste.. security to p revent this highly<br />

carcinogenic fzem getting into the environment? i do not<br />

think the tanks are safe..<br />

On the subject of permissible levels of radiation, the<br />

government is consistent in discrediting and terminating<br />

research project. that may suggest all is not as well as<br />

claimed. Dr. Samuel Milhan Jr. study of more than 500,000<br />

males who died in the state from 1950. to 1971 concluded that<br />

workers at the hanford nuclear plant were more likely to die<br />

of cancer thanother Washington state males. Dr. Milhan<br />

eventually lost the funding for continued research.<br />

The government.' behavior of concealing mistake.{ issueing<br />

misleading statements, repudiation of report s that disease<br />

And death may be attributed to radiation doses, and<br />

intolerances to dissent with the nuclear indumtry must<br />

change coarse. For the public distrust is to great an<br />

obstacle to overcome.<br />

Why le it the public was not informed of the December 2,<br />

1949 discharge of 5,500 curiae of 1-131 an iodine isotope<br />

which concentrates in human thyroid p ... ibly causing massive<br />

functional damage and later . yielding thyroid moduITS and<br />

canner. By camper :son, a single release of 15 curies of<br />

2.5.5<br />

2.2.12<br />

3.1.4.28<br />

2.5.5<br />

RECEN,i3 rn -RL<br />

•^n^--x'1986 p^5^<br />

WMOIVISION

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!