EIS-0113_Section_9 - Hanford Site

More documents

Recommendations

Info

p 5 YM, lîrJ • RECEIVED DOE-RL JUL 181986 0:,B9 •oa I WMDIVISION 8"P71r, lTtG - Aia44Ma ealtnfaetlwwm aw. w+^ :^ REC:;:cp DOE-RL J8L18I988 odg9 VIMDMSION N iA O 82AllfKRW FOR DA 20 MMMNG Joly 15, 1986 1 raaoce with at aomuetry Sta[e«vt on Disarmament,` and in c on ce rn for the health and eeviroumut of the Nortbeesq end thevoold copwity, - ne Sisters of S t. Joseph of Peace urge that: - 2. 5.6 i. The S-Reactor he shut do we itmeafately; 2 .2.1 E. The Plecooiver-uranium Extraction process and all production of weapons grade pluessi m cro wn; 3. There uob be a ucle astecowpository at Hanford; and 4. The special isotope facility be elimipated.. 2.2.13 pfually, we saw it as ea st important that there be an independent ¢eradication of all Hanford OPezatiauc. awJrn wr..r- - --WAA d7... yr.,. 7Ae.e :. —4, 1 r wta.alfi, ;- f4ri r^ ,71 e. L,r;.l ..! ^.a,yy. at,a d' -,,- ..,.,.y,r u x a PP,.e,a ne l`"'""' W, Ga,I&3 a..J P&...-,...r ,f s..,6 ...aTaw:L , y. a.^ ee3 d^ pa35:......,.^, - w;l &e , 7e .Vp Ra Pwaf -t' .j 71,.,, --U r73 1, n..G:(Et a..npd 6 As ^Y!r'a!n p.el. a Aiuua...a,. ;exPG'r.-/t êra.JaGl.w a La.e: %W d'A .4t J Jdc —&w.4 g mt cmdih^wa. +^.m..% wuAa^. +,ynr, a..^..y k a.âA : ma.P L..e ,,,,,:ae 'm^ ,.s.,.A n ^°"'" f x .e..tG a_ yw 3 ?P?u .•an ,.fm G 1ru wA al^.w6 rlu, iw,,, sou it< u,.ddY j.w,.J ipx;. t.at ..: its. ruYAYt.e N/e a.e Aid 71-r ftr6-aGu s.-d NP.+L ,.-h &-.-V a..w„y 1(..-.ta.. a, A_ .awdt.(A^ ",f— Nt Ga..e A4e„f A:, Lane, ;. p71w. pus. a-.1...: wit., r.. r4A. i Wt.T w d^^ ...f^,a., o7tw - -%. h w ..-d 16+-+n ...«.+.«w .< -P-, _i., Lawn :....tW.. feeo:.., a,4 .aY^ d7Aa.a, ..e7.ati.^ 'o.»Av. Pe R.... ", /3^dl^dd ^: Janie S. Rafcblis CS;P Director, Office of Justice and peace -Sisters of St. Joseph Of peace The s h tem of se l pb ei Peare SI lemmt D t me W., he Ce a (II a St Jonah 1 P hl I 1 c mu"Y. wbhaY deel.ee w. reel 1 e She les hoo ad deft Y N 11. u M i NR ; nal: Y .f m.n dn4selbv. W art 1 tN • (1 ( d b bt le 14 ra t week .1 w6w.t4y wi neNes .ad Mben I 1. .. ;amnnll" N . verih.ed (nhfen[n, N wdne -a ad . wasa dnlnrtles .ew. f+,a.7 7l-te weua. A"'.A . a7 d-- Y 72;e .. e-dl i,—, .:.d.w 3ef ar p,.aulNfs.,gtr...... Jc n,l, La. ,,,_ 12. L-4l ad WP/,SS 4,— —a ayP mX, a-d ne,; a.ean..a-wo. 7th Gd 4. !„assn aA,; 7' a a f^ 2.5.6 "`^`.^J'^f ^M .pA fi n.. ^.r.e t.,^. n.td ^, !/n4,d, at7a7+w ap.w^ v z L aWad— 1 a^P°^ rr^^ —Ma r.;e P"°y ,n ^^ 3.3.5.2 '.... I 3i, MAFY P#MNGNAIE 1853 gWP U WAY. PA WX 248, DE 1. WASHINGTON 9gW3O24e 206 454'S
M 1 t 2.3.1.14 3 .3.1.1 2.1.9 Mary V.-It lin And.'.- 6844 30th Avenue N.E. 6eattlq WA 9B115 July I5. 1986 Testimony on Nuclear Defense Waste RECEIVED DDE-RL JUL 18 1986 x4i V/M DIVISION TM1e forty year old accumulation of noel ur waste at Hanford presents a n wooly difficult problem far which a eft t echnalap 1 offer. no completely effective solution. urHowever, this defense waste is cjust a mall part of the total nuclear rite problem and cannot be considered separately. All radfo.etive ..at.. are alike in their oang.roua potential, whether their origin is weapon production or power plant generation. The Department of Energy's mistaken idea that we rid ea lees of any of this deadly waste by burying it i underground vaults is a carefully perpetrated myth. In fact, burying the deadly garb.,. 1s really goat a form of storage, the only open option at this time. Whether the material i defense .mate or power plant waste, it will still be the,. far the next 10,000 to 240,000 year .. .... ibly a ..Limp it. revs, ing influence in ways that our most brilliant scientists have not yet imagined. Considering the violent geological history of this planet and the lxk ensiva longevity of radioactive material, the plan to bury nuclear wastes in underground repositories is 'absolutely 3.3.1.1 mniac. a 1. Even the moot carefully studied gaologi pa! site c n ever provide the required; l0{000 years of guaranteed* predictable s purity against major geological upheaval. generation of deadly wat.. which will affect our planet i The Hanford site I. an entially forever -new w - having o difficulty especially poor choice for m underground repository. Studies of the possible interaction 2.1.1 between some very hot waste and the basalt rock formation yield vidence ofpoaslble calamitous problems. Future earthquake s . could easily shattmr rock formations surrounding unding an underground repository and could open up now channels for. groundwater under pressures of as much as 1,00 0 . pound- per square inch. This pressurized water Could begin ax,vin, through the waste vaults and t .... d the .urface. According to U.S. Geological Association Hydrologist 8111 Meyer, a yen without the precipitating influence of an arthquake the p .... uris.d flow of water in underground aquifer o may be pervasive or three dimen... h.l. that f oving t ... Id the ..'face a well a horizontally. Considering the potential of pressurizedat—, the Hanford site . % proximity to the Columbia River Would further emeeprbate an already catastrophic situation, possibly creating a widespread nuclear wasteland in the Northwest. RECEIVED DOE-RL JUL 181988, &Oqo VIM DIVISION Becauo the Nevada and Texas sites or ... M' different but equally serious problems, some type of aboveground monitored retrievable storage syat.m t s to be a viable and safer farm of storage than burial in mdeep underground repositories. containment Storing the wastes abovegr.und in specifically designed fac111ti.. woultl enable m hita,ih, and control. that would be impossible if the waste w oremoved from human control by deep burial In rock formation.. eYA e lso. Monitored Retrievable Stol.0...old be less ..penatve,. construction would be easier construction antl woultl not Fequlre ..cliff.. of human lives • undergrountl probably ..old, 1 1 could off., greater safety, and it could be located anywhere, not Just in politically convenient places such as Washington state. The most important tl ante,. of this Plan. however,. is that it .,form time to evaluate thoroughly the concept of underground burial or even to develop new solutions:. TM1e Department of Energy should then no longerfeel ...1.1l.d to declare Hanford, Nevada, or Texas suitable sites for repa.ltori.a when the.. sites have not even been adequately studied. I strongly object to this precipitous action which shows callous disregard for the safety and .ell-being of Washington Otat. clk ;sane. Although this monitored retrievable storage systam offers a nably •an. disp ... I method, the really critical issue amain- a ue threat to our entire planet. the continued 3.3.4.2 proliferation zofnuclear Weapons and power plants when there is 2.5.6 eatly no truly effective way to Fltl a or planet of the tleatlly rites. The very future of our vulnerable planet depends upon the r solution of thisissue. We continue to .proliferate the storing the ..at. of just the past forty year.. What about the next forty years? What about the next century? 'Does our Manifest Deatlny" includ. the construction of Monitored retrievable star.,. facilities from "tea to'ihini., sea". a sea poe.Ibly shining due to radioactive ]um ineacencaP 01 a e to convert our entire planet into. gigantic nuclear oe .story, burying our hum.. .... along kith the daftlU ptl vewaakes saw ... led uby Par failure to ... th at . on? Currently there a ultimately. satisfying an s to the.. q ... ti.... - Untile arompletely n affective ma a found to rid our planet of atomic waste, our pursuit ofenergy from the atom ui entirely i Even apart from the possibility of literally burying ourselves in nuclear waste or destroying ourselves by nuclear war, it I. probably just a matter of tim. until we experien ce at leastôns American "Chernobyl Syndrome-- 2.5.6
Page 1 and 2:
AR TARGET SHEET The following docum
Page 3:
COYER SHEET RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: U.S
Page 6 and 7:
contained comments regarding its pr
Page 8 and 9:
'Tel, handling container; previousl
Page 10 and 11:
Comment Letter No. Reviewer Affilia
Page 12 and 13:
Comment Letter No. . Reviewer Affil
Page 14 and 15:
I Comment Letter No. Reviewer Affil
Page 16 and 17:
II Comment Letter No. Rev iewer Aff
Page 18 and 19:
Page 20 and 21:
Page 22 and 23:
Page 25 and 26:
Processing of Written Continents 1.
Page 27 and 28:
s a 10 4 0 1 001 001 N MG? ], "86 R
Page 29 and 30:
Ea --Z -- 003 004 oea a.nn,om 4u'RR
Page 31 and 32:
,y I F 'S. on ^ g "' 4d '.+A 0 0®4
Page 33 and 34:
• t V RECEIVED DOE-RL 005 Mr. Ric
Page 35 and 36:
$ 3 006 007 doe/ too 7 `7 CITY OF K
Page 37 and 38:
J A ^^ $„ 3§ 009 010 /6 RECEIVED
Page 39 and 40:
Oil RECEIVEu DOE-RL JUL 8 10 012 De
Page 41 and 42:
C 8 4 K y CJl 3.3.2.1 Efiec[ an O[h
Page 43 and 44:
gg MW r 2. Comsenta on Lran Environ
Page 45 and 46:
9 015 016 U V/,9 00 i t. R.R. Mot H
Page 47 and 48:
€ - UK 0.1e 001f tt • 115 Locus
Page 49 and 50:
0 4 2 6 zL' 021 021 6c RECEIVED DOE
Page 51 and 52:
0 N U1 023 0"2 Letter in lien of as
Page 53 and 54:
024 025 RE CEIVED DDE -1l,,A C,^.1
Page 55 and 56:
"a 3 q 3 , a ^F sy 025 025 pers REC
Page 57 and 58:
02 7 1 s W U.S.0epartment of Energy
Page 59 and 60:
.j 2 a tN +1 \!i ^: J 031 2 .1. 1 I
Page 61 and 62:
033 033 31The vast majority of dual
Page 63 and 64:
m ®33 Fixing the Problumis) Year 1
Page 65 and 66:
1 035 036 RECEIVED DC' .. _ L 9d//f
Page 67 and 68:
fi ig ,- ^5 a m 1 Js W CO30 TTSalHO
Page 69 and 70:
k .^ ij is BE ' 3 Inland Empire Reg
Page 71 and 72:
£ 4 5 Yi l:I T g pD43 MQ'p ^TT EC
Page 73 and 74:
€ f^ »y § ^ o BE ME à:{ HE HON
Page 75 and 76:
0 4 044 4 CJl 1-^ 3 of." tcE'-iVED
Page 77 and 78:
ss. M 0044 J. RECEIVED DQE-RL JUL 1
Page 79 and 80:
am UK UT 2.3.2.9 2.2.7 2.1.1 REGLIV
Page 81 and 82:
sm UI 6641. RECENEU pUE-RL IUL 14 1
Page 83 and 84:
4 2 Ef. •. B91 Ln W 3.3.2.2 3 .3.
Page 85 and 86:
ME 04°7 TESTIMONY ON HANFORD N-WAS
Page 87 and 88:
E^g ^ d F k 1 f5 £"3 U:, 049 M W 2
Page 89 and 90:
c 049 049 0Cn 0040 RECEIVED DOE-RL
Page 91 and 92:
J M 051 V 2.5.6 page 2 Morgan July
Page 93 and 94:
z 052 053 RECEIVED, DO E-RL JUL 14
Page 95 and 96:
Im 053 3 RECEIVED DOEAL OREGON POSI
Page 97 and 98:
F f.. WC 053 3 .3.5.3 RECEIVED DOE-
Page 99 and 100:
055 d ll%7C a.vvâ- .;1c Fcw wa^sv
Page 101 and 102:
a f 8° 3 _A7 ej is M69 Sf M[SR1' O
Page 103 and 104: 05! ^9 Chairman, Subcommittee on Ge
Page 105 and 106: 05'7 057 Page Five RECEIVED DDE-RL
Page 107 and 108: 1 t 6 05'7 05'7 Page Nine RECEIVED
Page 109 and 110: 0 z 05'7 05'7 Page Thirteen RECEIVE
Page 111 and 112: 9 ra am BTi:rif ;.^.EiVc^ Cc-RL [oa
Page 113 and 114: aw RECEIVED COE-RL JUL 1 A 1986 WM
Page 115 and 116: El i 1 1 The OS ME moat ow0 up to t
Page 117 and 118: .rte M OG1 A fiscal year 1988 budge
Page 119 and 120: 3 ^ a 4 9 a DI OG3 V v •F c N v L
Page 121 and 122: 111: 64 My League of Women Voters o
Page 123 and 124: 9- n, a y 067 M& E D ID t? Indeed,
Page 125 and 126: $'a s r3 - 4 i S + 'n 0 ^_1a e d ^-
Page 127 and 128: ^.^' 0 7® 0170 RECE VEU DOE-RL REC
Page 129 and 130: 8 Is Page6 WH RECEIVED DOE.RL JUL 1
Page 131 and 132: :l p 071 071 1— CD V 3.1.4.5 J 3.
Page 133 and 134: 0 72 1 2 0'72 H C) O ID ^/ Y AffAff
Page 135 and 136: i fr F ti 1 074 0'74 H RECEIVED DOE
Page 137 and 138: F a @ k ^Jg f' `f j ?y xt € 75 M
Page 139 and 140: 1 0 HAI 07'7 078 JUL 18 1986 0611 I
Page 141 and 142: € 78 wool N d 3.3.5.7 RECEIVED DO
Page 143 and 144: 2 A rim 0 # 5 x ME o1 _ Raebb Pat-W
Page 145 and 146: 081 RECEIVED DDE-RL JULIB1906 01 Co
Page 147 and 148: 4 7 mm 2.2..3 `7 „ u,/z', 3 o.,^.
Page 149 and 150: 1 u f¢^$y Y$ q{ 3a $ E 4 ^^ 4? Yq
Page 151 and 152: CIE M 086 S^nr . Le ^ / ^ `r'dtl2 H
Page 153: 1' _ k e .. §} ate¢ ,^ Ell N.=CEI
Page 157 and 158: t^ 092 093 Olympia, July 14. 19 Wa.
Page 159 and 160: 7 - Ej 09 _ - oog17 Q97 9052 39th A
Page 161 and 162: . '^ ,. ^ ^ std a 1':p 099 100 July
Page 163 and 164: n P F 1 102 103 I^ RECEIVED DOEAL .
Page 165 and 166: - 3 n fi ..i 0 ^ c 33441. -'2. 1 "
Page 167 and 168: ON Im \4k16 Sb 3 '^-6\ WA RECEIVED
Page 169 and 170: 4, Y^ EM 107 108 2 .1 WE has violat
Page 171 and 172: D k ^wT 1W IM RECEIVED DOERL keC FI
Page 173 and 174: 110 111 3.2.6.3 2.5.1 2.5.1 3.3.1.1
Page 175 and 176: e`4 ^ 3 fr8 ^^ k 3 xp U .,y1 Ill il
Page 177 and 178: M -15 RECEIVED DOE-RL JUt22 OSS aiM
Page 179 and 180: e RECEIVED DOE-RL JUL 22 1986 t0lb
Page 181 and 182: LM . . Hl V continue to cause. nur.
Page 183 and 184: a,1i 5 q.d 120 nu 3.5.5.28 3.3.2.1
Page 185 and 186: 3.3.5.4 3.3.4.2 2.5.6 121 RECEIVED
Page 187 and 188: d ! d a 5 6 9_ :^v`s Im F_m FY "'L
Page 189 and 190: d m 125 s(fllEm61r Pap- TM Pabkc 1A
Page 191 and 192: x 8 ^ f ti r^ ' 3 ^ 4g L.';;., 2'7
Page 193 and 194: 3 .. g g jky Sw 6 128 Page 3 - RECE
Page 195 and 196: N a :. S 1 29 V N 2.5.5 2.2.14 2.2.
Page 197 and 198: •1 3 J ' ¢ I 6 130 1130 RECEIVED
Page 199 and 200: s Ì V t;1) 133 V OF Okk Dogln CmM
Page 201 and 202: _ y ou op } op o uopeaaua8 a ]nF a
Page 203 and 204: G 4 i `; F4 Y7 136 13'7 V 2.5.6 2.2
Page 205 and 206:
51 0 13 19 DO W F-' 3.3.3.1 Th9 Ove
Page 207 and 208:
d 3 a. Hou MM NECE-0 !?OE-RL Holton
Page 209 and 210:
13 .4A RECEIVED DOE-RL 3.1.2.5 3.1.
Page 211 and 212:
is 443 143 N W V 3.5.5.28 3.3.2.1 R
Page 213 and 214:
fi e T i 8 # ^'^ ^ I^ 5 a x ?'2. ea
Page 215 and 216:
3%_ 3 —ie v^ F f ,lo1075-94 #,1 1
Page 217 and 218:
147 147 3.3:5,5 RECEPr--D rJOE-RL C
Page 219 and 220:
M 11/7 '14'7 .,ÊccnAIZ23 ÔE-RL ou
Page 221 and 222:
Es 14 M0 RECEIVED DCE-RL 3.1.3.26 3
Page 223 and 224:
e"_4 a 2 Is 51 F-' LD ro N 4- 4-i C
show all

EIS-0113_Section_9 - Hanford Site

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?