EIS-0113_Section_9 - Hanford Site

More documents

Recommendations

Info

.:y 1W um It t I Itil'I L1-. sass . 1 1: HG: A . 1V I'll LIJII 1,1 1 OLLG 61 .^ 1 I J ILLV.U'I LI: LY'i : I: VL: •I: JI 1'N: 'Mlle, i 1040 1, 11 1 . . page 2 RECEIVED DOE-RL' JUL 221986 WMDIVISION Page RECEIVE D DOER wuL221986 D!// WM DIVISION ti giving priority consideration to the protection of public health and our environment. on May 28th John Herrington, Secretary of Energy. announced that, if DOE has its way. further consideration of secondary repository site.. in the central and "'tern United States will be indefinitely postponed. It is particularly disturbing that the decision to Indefinitely postpone work on a second repository was based partially on.the Department of Energy assumption that defense waste in mingle-shell tanks at Hanford would not be placed in e repository.This implies that the Department of Energy has ,3.3.6.7 f .,. 01 O OO 2 .1.O The Department's unilateral decision to e depend the second 2 .2.14 repodtocy siting program violate. both the intent and letter of the law. As a member of the Senate Environment and public Works Committee during 9 the 97th Con g rose, I was deeply 8y involved in developing the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982. I was responsible for including in the Act provisions that require the siting at A second repository and place A cap On the amount of waste disposed of in the first repository.. My intent ion was to ensure that the first repository site would not later become the already decided not to choose the option of disposing of Hanford' s existing defense Waste Ina repository. Under existing law, no more than 70,000 metric tons of high level ..waste can be disposed of in the first repository. If Hanford's existing defense wart. was added to commercial waste and other defense waste the combined total Weald exceed 80,000 metric tons. The Department'. ApParent opposition to building a ...Oud repository gives the impresion that the Department intends to leave Hanford's defense waste where it 3s. i only repository in the nation. The Final Environmental Impact Statement must clarify this 2.4.1.1 The Department of Energy has neither the responsibility not the authority to decide whether or not to proceed with the :.lotion of A second repository.. As one of the Senators 1.oOIv.d in dra Ring the Act., I can attest to the fact that the element. of the Act are I ... P ... his. : The airing of A second repository I. a key element that can not be removed without joupaxdizin g the entire Act. The Department of Energy must be requited to strictly comply with the law. issue and specifically address the impact of .inglo-shell tank waste disposal on the first repository. I am deeply concerned that the Department of Energy's illegal second repository decision will add pressure by the Department to statilize the single-swell tank ... to in place. Another issue of particular concern is that the Draft Environmental Impact Statement dose not adequately address the 3.3.2.1 13
e`4 ^ 3 fr8 ^^ k 3 xp U .,y1 Ill ill 1 HUn IkLL1.W IkN 1Ya !-I'/-tlU: 9: J1 VN: [1111 bJ 1yv i '!-I'l-tlG: I:, P.; IM, .1 i 4.W.11 1 . O Page e RECL RL euL h 2 E186 WM DIV10 dll I page 5 RECEIVED DOE•RL JUL 22 ISas ON4 WM DIVISION - mac live quantities of chemical waste currently in the single- in the ongoing site selection process for high level was te shalltanke and contaminating. Hanford soil. This chemical repositories. I have cosponsored legislation to rectify this 3.1.6 .1 contamination is a dangerous environmental and Health threat. The Department of energy must .take immediate action to identify serious oversight, and I caution the Department not to make the same error in considering defense waste disposal options. I 3.4.2.23 the hazardous chemicals at Hanford and ensure that each disposal join the citizens of Spokane and other communities on potential al ternative specificall y addresse o . chemical contamination. transportation corridors in urging the Department of Energy to carefully consider the transportation impacts of its defen se In addition, the Draft Environmental Impact Statement does past. motion.. In addition, it 10 . important that the Final 3.4.2.24 r fn N not indicate that the Department Of Energy intends to comply with the requirements and the intent of federal and state Environmental Impact Statement includes an explanation of the federal assistance which x111 be made available to. 10 0e1 environmental laws. The Washington Department of Ecology emergency response providers. already has fined the Department of Energy for Han£Ord's non- 2.4.1.1 compliance with certain environmental law. The Department's non-compliance with these environmental laws can not be I strongly Support the Department of Energy's efforts to clean up Hanford. I will continue to work for adequate federal tolerated. TheDepnftment of Energy must demonstrate that its defen se waste actions can satisfy federal and State laws. in the Final funding to support the se efforts, including continuing work on a facility to process rather than bury the N-Seactor i z cadfoactive discharge, pumping radioactive liquid out of single-shell tanks p and researching and developing technologi es , such as the 2.3.2.12 2.4.1.1 Environmental Impact Statement, the Department should indicate its intent to comply with all . appropriate federal and aLate laws to protect public health and the env ir onment. glaneffication facility, for immobilising nuclear waste. Another concern which deserves special note is the impact 3.4.2.23 of the transportation of defense waste. In my view, the t Department has not adequately addressed transportation impacts
Page 1 and 2:
AR TARGET SHEET The following docum
Page 3:
COYER SHEET RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: U.S
Page 6 and 7:
contained comments regarding its pr
Page 8 and 9:
'Tel, handling container; previousl
Page 10 and 11:
Comment Letter No. Reviewer Affilia
Page 12 and 13:
Comment Letter No. . Reviewer Affil
Page 14 and 15:
I Comment Letter No. Reviewer Affil
Page 16 and 17:
II Comment Letter No. Rev iewer Aff
Page 18 and 19:
Page 20 and 21:
Page 22 and 23:
Page 25 and 26:
Processing of Written Continents 1.
Page 27 and 28:
s a 10 4 0 1 001 001 N MG? ], "86 R
Page 29 and 30:
Ea --Z -- 003 004 oea a.nn,om 4u'RR
Page 31 and 32:
,y I F 'S. on ^ g "' 4d '.+A 0 0®4
Page 33 and 34:
• t V RECEIVED DOE-RL 005 Mr. Ric
Page 35 and 36:
$ 3 006 007 doe/ too 7 `7 CITY OF K
Page 37 and 38:
J A ^^ $„ 3§ 009 010 /6 RECEIVED
Page 39 and 40:
Oil RECEIVEu DOE-RL JUL 8 10 012 De
Page 41 and 42:
C 8 4 K y CJl 3.3.2.1 Efiec[ an O[h
Page 43 and 44:
gg MW r 2. Comsenta on Lran Environ
Page 45 and 46:
9 015 016 U V/,9 00 i t. R.R. Mot H
Page 47 and 48:
€ - UK 0.1e 001f tt • 115 Locus
Page 49 and 50:
0 4 2 6 zL' 021 021 6c RECEIVED DOE
Page 51 and 52:
0 N U1 023 0"2 Letter in lien of as
Page 53 and 54:
024 025 RE CEIVED DDE -1l,,A C,^.1
Page 55 and 56:
"a 3 q 3 , a ^F sy 025 025 pers REC
Page 57 and 58:
02 7 1 s W U.S.0epartment of Energy
Page 59 and 60:
.j 2 a tN +1 \!i ^: J 031 2 .1. 1 I
Page 61 and 62:
033 033 31The vast majority of dual
Page 63 and 64:
m ®33 Fixing the Problumis) Year 1
Page 65 and 66:
1 035 036 RECEIVED DC' .. _ L 9d//f
Page 67 and 68:
fi ig ,- ^5 a m 1 Js W CO30 TTSalHO
Page 69 and 70:
k .^ ij is BE ' 3 Inland Empire Reg
Page 71 and 72:
£ 4 5 Yi l:I T g pD43 MQ'p ^TT EC
Page 73 and 74:
€ f^ »y § ^ o BE ME à:{ HE HON
Page 75 and 76:
0 4 044 4 CJl 1-^ 3 of." tcE'-iVED
Page 77 and 78:
ss. M 0044 J. RECEIVED DQE-RL JUL 1
Page 79 and 80:
am UK UT 2.3.2.9 2.2.7 2.1.1 REGLIV
Page 81 and 82:
sm UI 6641. RECENEU pUE-RL IUL 14 1
Page 83 and 84:
4 2 Ef. •. B91 Ln W 3.3.2.2 3 .3.
Page 85 and 86:
ME 04°7 TESTIMONY ON HANFORD N-WAS
Page 87 and 88:
E^g ^ d F k 1 f5 £"3 U:, 049 M W 2
Page 89 and 90:
c 049 049 0Cn 0040 RECEIVED DOE-RL
Page 91 and 92:
J M 051 V 2.5.6 page 2 Morgan July
Page 93 and 94:
z 052 053 RECEIVED, DO E-RL JUL 14
Page 95 and 96:
Im 053 3 RECEIVED DOEAL OREGON POSI
Page 97 and 98:
F f.. WC 053 3 .3.5.3 RECEIVED DOE-
Page 99 and 100:
055 d ll%7C a.vvâ- .;1c Fcw wa^sv
Page 101 and 102:
a f 8° 3 _A7 ej is M69 Sf M[SR1' O
Page 103 and 104:
05! ^9 Chairman, Subcommittee on Ge
Page 105 and 106:
05'7 057 Page Five RECEIVED DDE-RL
Page 107 and 108:
1 t 6 05'7 05'7 Page Nine RECEIVED
Page 109 and 110:
0 z 05'7 05'7 Page Thirteen RECEIVE
Page 111 and 112:
9 ra am BTi:rif ;.^.EiVc^ Cc-RL [oa
Page 113 and 114:
aw RECEIVED COE-RL JUL 1 A 1986 WM
Page 115 and 116:
El i 1 1 The OS ME moat ow0 up to t
Page 117 and 118:
.rte M OG1 A fiscal year 1988 budge
Page 119 and 120:
3 ^ a 4 9 a DI OG3 V v •F c N v L
Page 121 and 122:
111: 64 My League of Women Voters o
Page 123 and 124: 9- n, a y 067 M& E D ID t? Indeed,
Page 125 and 126: $'a s r3 - 4 i S + 'n 0 ^_1a e d ^-
Page 127 and 128: ^.^' 0 7® 0170 RECE VEU DOE-RL REC
Page 129 and 130: 8 Is Page6 WH RECEIVED DOE.RL JUL 1
Page 131 and 132: :l p 071 071 1— CD V 3.1.4.5 J 3.
Page 133 and 134: 0 72 1 2 0'72 H C) O ID ^/ Y AffAff
Page 135 and 136: i fr F ti 1 074 0'74 H RECEIVED DOE
Page 137 and 138: F a @ k ^Jg f' `f j ?y xt € 75 M
Page 139 and 140: 1 0 HAI 07'7 078 JUL 18 1986 0611 I
Page 141 and 142: € 78 wool N d 3.3.5.7 RECEIVED DO
Page 143 and 144: 2 A rim 0 # 5 x ME o1 _ Raebb Pat-W
Page 145 and 146: 081 RECEIVED DDE-RL JULIB1906 01 Co
Page 147 and 148: 4 7 mm 2.2..3 `7 „ u,/z', 3 o.,^.
Page 149 and 150: 1 u f¢^$y Y$ q{ 3a $ E 4 ^^ 4? Yq
Page 151 and 152: CIE M 086 S^nr . Le ^ / ^ `r'dtl2 H
Page 153 and 154: 1' _ k e .. §} ate¢ ,^ Ell N.=CEI
Page 155 and 156: M 1 t 2.3.1.14 3 .3.1.1 2.1.9 Mary
Page 157 and 158: t^ 092 093 Olympia, July 14. 19 Wa.
Page 159 and 160: 7 - Ej 09 _ - oog17 Q97 9052 39th A
Page 161 and 162: . '^ ,. ^ ^ std a 1':p 099 100 July
Page 163 and 164: n P F 1 102 103 I^ RECEIVED DOEAL .
Page 165 and 166: - 3 n fi ..i 0 ^ c 33441. -'2. 1 "
Page 167 and 168: ON Im \4k16 Sb 3 '^-6\ WA RECEIVED
Page 169 and 170: 4, Y^ EM 107 108 2 .1 WE has violat
Page 171 and 172: D k ^wT 1W IM RECEIVED DOERL keC FI
Page 173: 110 111 3.2.6.3 2.5.1 2.5.1 3.3.1.1
Page 177 and 178: M -15 RECEIVED DOE-RL JUt22 OSS aiM
Page 179 and 180: e RECEIVED DOE-RL JUL 22 1986 t0lb
Page 181 and 182: LM . . Hl V continue to cause. nur.
Page 183 and 184: a,1i 5 q.d 120 nu 3.5.5.28 3.3.2.1
Page 185 and 186: 3.3.5.4 3.3.4.2 2.5.6 121 RECEIVED
Page 187 and 188: d ! d a 5 6 9_ :^v`s Im F_m FY "'L
Page 189 and 190: d m 125 s(fllEm61r Pap- TM Pabkc 1A
Page 191 and 192: x 8 ^ f ti r^ ' 3 ^ 4g L.';;., 2'7
Page 193 and 194: 3 .. g g jky Sw 6 128 Page 3 - RECE
Page 195 and 196: N a :. S 1 29 V N 2.5.5 2.2.14 2.2.
Page 197 and 198: •1 3 J ' ¢ I 6 130 1130 RECEIVED
Page 199 and 200: s Ì V t;1) 133 V OF Okk Dogln CmM
Page 201 and 202: _ y ou op } op o uopeaaua8 a ]nF a
Page 203 and 204: G 4 i `; F4 Y7 136 13'7 V 2.5.6 2.2
Page 205 and 206: 51 0 13 19 DO W F-' 3.3.3.1 Th9 Ove
Page 207 and 208: d 3 a. Hou MM NECE-0 !?OE-RL Holton
Page 209 and 210: 13 .4A RECEIVED DOE-RL 3.1.2.5 3.1.
Page 211 and 212: is 443 143 N W V 3.5.5.28 3.3.2.1 R
Page 213 and 214: fi e T i 8 # ^'^ ^ I^ 5 a x ?'2. ea
Page 215 and 216: 3%_ 3 —ie v^ F f ,lo1075-94 #,1 1
Page 217 and 218: 147 147 3.3:5,5 RECEPr--D rJOE-RL C
Page 219 and 220: M 11/7 '14'7 .,ÊccnAIZ23 ÔE-RL ou
Page 221 and 222: Es 14 M0 RECEIVED DCE-RL 3.1.3.26 3
Page 223 and 224: e"_4 a 2 Is 51 F-' LD ro N 4- 4-i C
show all

EIS-0113_Section_9 - Hanford Site

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?