EIS-0113_Section_9 - Hanford Site

More documents

Recommendations

Info

i.d l yon' 2 146 =14'7 . RECEDtCD OO&RL CITY OF YAKIMA JUL '311966 pert JUL3006 Clô YiM UV1610N 6141 I an just a mtln;; I an rot a pzovdcisC; an ob]acfnz by 9 or 1$lol e^T ¢&rated idiot. I'am blessed with good Rd connote Sense: —thing a ®t1Cr l7J['re ofth, Mayo. C? HA" FAX/M.1 NASHINGMN 98"1 P1sr: (509) 5734050 .mad. W bring hex Children up to-aAUthnod. I sla0 have a good sanme of terror; 2.5.6 but I haven't used it math this day. I cas ct tell you how scared I - that we hove the unclear problem anyway. If ywdon't mnke it you dan't Fame to get rid of it. Don't try to but it in Washington, just under Box rose.. I don't kmw bow the rest of the states are as I Fame lived En the Numbers, states all my life; but .July 30, 1986 I do taw that No want sib still fox dual! Ibis had d ar e probably nothing as far as D.O.E. id Concerned; The only thirlg Rich Holten/EIS - it has dome for ve is reea lse som e of the tension I have felt today. But I an 2 . 3. 2. 8 N H.S. Department of EOffi Richland Otmen tro Office strong am I'll home more strength far the fight if it cores to one; on beat P. o. Box 550 Richland, WA 99352 the to 1. waste problem in this ommtzy. - Dear Mr. Bolted: A cc[ mnmd cltixa and scared. Mom, / Enclosed with this letter are y comments on the March, 1956. U.S. Department Dies of Energy's E nee to D. Intact Statement Oia 1 Of Sanford D £soon Draft XBEaa// o iN ,^" H h L el T nod Tank x121 Wastes (DOE EI 011 ). A copy of these comments will be included Hin e. Ore. 97738 is the report submitted by the Northeast Citizen's Forum as Defense Waste. I appreciate the opportunity to comnent, on the DEIS and look forward to continued participation in this important process. Please address any response to my residence: 916 So. 17th Avenue Yakima, WA 98902 Sincerely yours, _ Clarence Barnett Assistant Member, N orthwe Mmbr, e Nrthwest Citizen's Porum - .. on Defense waste'
147 147 3.3:5,5 RECEPr--D rJOE-RL COMMENTS OF CLARENCE BARNETT AL 31 1986 6141 ON ND - - 0113 ) 30 afi l WM DIVISION TIMING OF DEFENSE GEOLOG IC DISPOSAL ACTI O N S A N D OPE RATI ONAL DLATE FOR REPOSITORY; 1. There are several statements In the DEIS that Indicate defense waste will be processed and ready for geologic disposal before the operational date of the repository. REGEftR:u -;CE.RL AL 31 1986 HYDROLOGIC AND GEOCHEMICAL MODELS 6(47 VIM DIVISION a The enfrent status of hydrologic and geachemical models used to simulate subsurface contaminate migration necessitates making certain assumptions due to technical and data limitations.Calibration of computer models to actual field data is an issue to be closed prior to making a final disposal decision. Statements made in the DEIS (rather than a technical analysis) leaves reasonable is as to the adequacy of some of the preliminary analyses at this time. Testimony indicates that there are several interpretations as to the adequacy of the models used in the preliminary analyses. 3.5.2.6 I- -10 Cl) 3.3.5.5 A. "The meltan glass product is transferred Into canisters that will he temporarilystored at the TIWVP site. The waste canisters will be transferred from the HVWP to a geologic repository when such repository can receive these defense HLW and TRU waste forms." (Vol. 2, Section CA, Page C.2) This raises the question as to whether there is need for interim storage. The HDW-DEIS does not Include the anticipated inventory or environmental impacts resulting from this temporary storage. B. The DOE time line for the commencement of operations for the first repository is 1990. However, the DEIS. states that strontium and cesium capsules are to be stored In the Waste Encapsulation and Storage Facility until t995 and then removed for geologic disposal. (Vol. 1, Section 3.3.1.3 and Vol. 2, Section H.3.3) The NOW time line does not appear to be compatible with the beginning operational date for a rompository. C. An additional consideration that may affect the HOW time line for geologic disposal is whether the development of a Monitored Retrievable Storage Facility will beused to extend the beginning operational date for the repository. The final EIS should Include contingency approaches that would be pursued in the event that a repository has not commenced Operations or the role of an MRS facility for Hanford defense waste. 2. Several ambiguities for acceptance of defense waste in a geologic repository are found In USDOE "Retard of Responses to Public Comments on the Draft Mission Plan for the Civilian Radioactive Waste Management Program", June. 1985. (DOEIRW-0005) A. The schedule for the acceptance of defense waste is not tied to the 1998 date. (Vol. 2, Page 98) B. Commercial waste will be the first waste emplaced in the first phase of the first repository. (Vol. 2, Page 1831 This is an area of major concern. It is recognized that additional research and peer review will be required before a consensus can be obtained. WASTE PACKAGES FOR GEOLOGICAL DISPOSAL Waste package conceptual designs for geologic disposal have been developed and prototype testing is in process. The final EIS should include a statement as to whether the final waste package design will need to be site-specific depending on the yerehemical. (and other) conditions of the selected repository. - REDUCTION OF WASTE INTO SOIL DOE Order 5820.2 establishes the policy of eliminating ground disposal of radioactive waste and chemical waste Into the soil. DOE plans a separate study on this policy. The final EIS should include the scope and anticipated . time frame to implement DOE Order 5820.2. PACKAGING STANDARDS FOR TRANSPORTATION OF DEFENSE WASTE The DOE has the authority to design and certify its awn packaging to be used by government shippers. (Vol. 1, Page 1.51 Type B packaging design must be certified by either the DOE or NBC. (Vol. 2, Page 1.2) This raises the question as to whether there is different criteria used by the DOE and the NBC for design certification of packagings. The final EIS should clarify that packagings certified by the DOE must meet the NBC packaging standards. 3.1.8.16 2.4.1.19 3.4.2.12 3.4.2.13 The final EIS should include a time line for the processing of HOW for ..geologic disposal In relation to the acceptance schedule in the geologic. repository. CMIII A Fege 1 of 9 CMIII A Page 2 of 9
Page 1 and 2:
AR TARGET SHEET The following docum
Page 3:
COYER SHEET RESPONSIBLE AGENCY: U.S
Page 6 and 7:
contained comments regarding its pr
Page 8 and 9:
'Tel, handling container; previousl
Page 10 and 11:
Comment Letter No. Reviewer Affilia
Page 12 and 13:
Comment Letter No. . Reviewer Affil
Page 14 and 15:
I Comment Letter No. Reviewer Affil
Page 16 and 17:
II Comment Letter No. Rev iewer Aff
Page 18 and 19:
Page 20 and 21:
Page 22 and 23:
Page 25 and 26:
Processing of Written Continents 1.
Page 27 and 28:
s a 10 4 0 1 001 001 N MG? ], "86 R
Page 29 and 30:
Ea --Z -- 003 004 oea a.nn,om 4u'RR
Page 31 and 32:
,y I F 'S. on ^ g "' 4d '.+A 0 0®4
Page 33 and 34:
• t V RECEIVED DOE-RL 005 Mr. Ric
Page 35 and 36:
$ 3 006 007 doe/ too 7 `7 CITY OF K
Page 37 and 38:
J A ^^ $„ 3§ 009 010 /6 RECEIVED
Page 39 and 40:
Oil RECEIVEu DOE-RL JUL 8 10 012 De
Page 41 and 42:
C 8 4 K y CJl 3.3.2.1 Efiec[ an O[h
Page 43 and 44:
gg MW r 2. Comsenta on Lran Environ
Page 45 and 46:
9 015 016 U V/,9 00 i t. R.R. Mot H
Page 47 and 48:
€ - UK 0.1e 001f tt • 115 Locus
Page 49 and 50:
0 4 2 6 zL' 021 021 6c RECEIVED DOE
Page 51 and 52:
0 N U1 023 0"2 Letter in lien of as
Page 53 and 54:
024 025 RE CEIVED DDE -1l,,A C,^.1
Page 55 and 56:
"a 3 q 3 , a ^F sy 025 025 pers REC
Page 57 and 58:
02 7 1 s W U.S.0epartment of Energy
Page 59 and 60:
.j 2 a tN +1 \!i ^: J 031 2 .1. 1 I
Page 61 and 62:
033 033 31The vast majority of dual
Page 63 and 64:
m ®33 Fixing the Problumis) Year 1
Page 65 and 66:
1 035 036 RECEIVED DC' .. _ L 9d//f
Page 67 and 68:
fi ig ,- ^5 a m 1 Js W CO30 TTSalHO
Page 69 and 70:
k .^ ij is BE ' 3 Inland Empire Reg
Page 71 and 72:
£ 4 5 Yi l:I T g pD43 MQ'p ^TT EC
Page 73 and 74:
€ f^ »y § ^ o BE ME à:{ HE HON
Page 75 and 76:
0 4 044 4 CJl 1-^ 3 of." tcE'-iVED
Page 77 and 78:
ss. M 0044 J. RECEIVED DQE-RL JUL 1
Page 79 and 80:
am UK UT 2.3.2.9 2.2.7 2.1.1 REGLIV
Page 81 and 82:
sm UI 6641. RECENEU pUE-RL IUL 14 1
Page 83 and 84:
4 2 Ef. •. B91 Ln W 3.3.2.2 3 .3.
Page 85 and 86:
ME 04°7 TESTIMONY ON HANFORD N-WAS
Page 87 and 88:
E^g ^ d F k 1 f5 £"3 U:, 049 M W 2
Page 89 and 90:
c 049 049 0Cn 0040 RECEIVED DOE-RL
Page 91 and 92:
J M 051 V 2.5.6 page 2 Morgan July
Page 93 and 94:
z 052 053 RECEIVED, DO E-RL JUL 14
Page 95 and 96:
Im 053 3 RECEIVED DOEAL OREGON POSI
Page 97 and 98:
F f.. WC 053 3 .3.5.3 RECEIVED DOE-
Page 99 and 100:
055 d ll%7C a.vvâ- .;1c Fcw wa^sv
Page 101 and 102:
a f 8° 3 _A7 ej is M69 Sf M[SR1' O
Page 103 and 104:
05! ^9 Chairman, Subcommittee on Ge
Page 105 and 106:
05'7 057 Page Five RECEIVED DDE-RL
Page 107 and 108:
1 t 6 05'7 05'7 Page Nine RECEIVED
Page 109 and 110:
0 z 05'7 05'7 Page Thirteen RECEIVE
Page 111 and 112:
9 ra am BTi:rif ;.^.EiVc^ Cc-RL [oa
Page 113 and 114:
aw RECEIVED COE-RL JUL 1 A 1986 WM
Page 115 and 116:
El i 1 1 The OS ME moat ow0 up to t
Page 117 and 118:
.rte M OG1 A fiscal year 1988 budge
Page 119 and 120:
3 ^ a 4 9 a DI OG3 V v •F c N v L
Page 121 and 122:
111: 64 My League of Women Voters o
Page 123 and 124:
9- n, a y 067 M& E D ID t? Indeed,
Page 125 and 126:
$'a s r3 - 4 i S + 'n 0 ^_1a e d ^-
Page 127 and 128:
^.^' 0 7® 0170 RECE VEU DOE-RL REC
Page 129 and 130:
8 Is Page6 WH RECEIVED DOE.RL JUL 1
Page 131 and 132:
:l p 071 071 1— CD V 3.1.4.5 J 3.
Page 133 and 134:
0 72 1 2 0'72 H C) O ID ^/ Y AffAff
Page 135 and 136:
i fr F ti 1 074 0'74 H RECEIVED DOE
Page 137 and 138:
F a @ k ^Jg f' `f j ?y xt € 75 M
Page 139 and 140:
1 0 HAI 07'7 078 JUL 18 1986 0611 I
Page 141 and 142:
€ 78 wool N d 3.3.5.7 RECEIVED DO
Page 143 and 144:
2 A rim 0 # 5 x ME o1 _ Raebb Pat-W
Page 145 and 146:
081 RECEIVED DDE-RL JULIB1906 01 Co
Page 147 and 148:
4 7 mm 2.2..3 `7 „ u,/z', 3 o.,^.
Page 149 and 150:
1 u f¢^$y Y$ q{ 3a $ E 4 ^^ 4? Yq
Page 151 and 152:
CIE M 086 S^nr . Le ^ / ^ `r'dtl2 H
Page 153 and 154:
1' _ k e .. §} ate¢ ,^ Ell N.=CEI
Page 155 and 156:
M 1 t 2.3.1.14 3 .3.1.1 2.1.9 Mary
Page 157 and 158:
t^ 092 093 Olympia, July 14. 19 Wa.
Page 159 and 160:
7 - Ej 09 _ - oog17 Q97 9052 39th A
Page 161 and 162:
. '^ ,. ^ ^ std a 1':p 099 100 July
Page 163 and 164:
n P F 1 102 103 I^ RECEIVED DOEAL .
Page 165 and 166: - 3 n fi ..i 0 ^ c 33441. -'2. 1 "
Page 167 and 168: ON Im \4k16 Sb 3 '^-6\ WA RECEIVED
Page 169 and 170: 4, Y^ EM 107 108 2 .1 WE has violat
Page 171 and 172: D k ^wT 1W IM RECEIVED DOERL keC FI
Page 173 and 174: 110 111 3.2.6.3 2.5.1 2.5.1 3.3.1.1
Page 175 and 176: e`4 ^ 3 fr8 ^^ k 3 xp U .,y1 Ill il
Page 177 and 178: M -15 RECEIVED DOE-RL JUt22 OSS aiM
Page 179 and 180: e RECEIVED DOE-RL JUL 22 1986 t0lb
Page 181 and 182: LM . . Hl V continue to cause. nur.
Page 183 and 184: a,1i 5 q.d 120 nu 3.5.5.28 3.3.2.1
Page 185 and 186: 3.3.5.4 3.3.4.2 2.5.6 121 RECEIVED
Page 187 and 188: d ! d a 5 6 9_ :^v`s Im F_m FY "'L
Page 189 and 190: d m 125 s(fllEm61r Pap- TM Pabkc 1A
Page 191 and 192: x 8 ^ f ti r^ ' 3 ^ 4g L.';;., 2'7
Page 193 and 194: 3 .. g g jky Sw 6 128 Page 3 - RECE
Page 195 and 196: N a :. S 1 29 V N 2.5.5 2.2.14 2.2.
Page 197 and 198: •1 3 J ' ¢ I 6 130 1130 RECEIVED
Page 199 and 200: s Ì V t;1) 133 V OF Okk Dogln CmM
Page 201 and 202: _ y ou op } op o uopeaaua8 a ]nF a
Page 203 and 204: G 4 i `; F4 Y7 136 13'7 V 2.5.6 2.2
Page 205 and 206: 51 0 13 19 DO W F-' 3.3.3.1 Th9 Ove
Page 207 and 208: d 3 a. Hou MM NECE-0 !?OE-RL Holton
Page 209 and 210: 13 .4A RECEIVED DOE-RL 3.1.2.5 3.1.
Page 211 and 212: is 443 143 N W V 3.5.5.28 3.3.2.1 R
Page 213 and 214: fi e T i 8 # ^'^ ^ I^ 5 a x ?'2. ea
Page 215: 3%_ 3 —ie v^ F f ,lo1075-94 #,1 1
Page 219 and 220: M 11/7 '14'7 .,ÊccnAIZ23 ÔE-RL ou
Page 221 and 222: Es 14 M0 RECEIVED DCE-RL 3.1.3.26 3
Page 223 and 224: e"_4 a 2 Is 51 F-' LD ro N 4- 4-i C
show all

EIS-0113_Section_9 - Hanford Site

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?