06.01.2014 Views

EIS-0113_Section_9 - Hanford Site

EIS-0113_Section_9 - Hanford Site

EIS-0113_Section_9 - Hanford Site

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

p<br />

,i<br />

-410579<br />

133 134<br />

-. Mr. Jerry White<br />

July 17, 1986<br />

Paget<br />

t<br />

City' of l,etiision<br />

? io ax os oxv aex ro er<br />

P08TjOFFILE BO% 61]<br />

LEWI6TON. IaFXO B35a1<br />

V<br />

.<br />

computer model of the Portland wellflelds. We anticipate that the study will -<br />

1.) 7e.11<br />

-<br />

have a total cost of $500,000 and require about three years to complete. The<br />

study islimited only to the hydrology and geology of the area influenced by the July 21, 1986<br />

wellfieid and does not even begin to address water quality issues and economic<br />

considerations. The study we are p ro posing that DOE undertake would, in most -<br />

cases. take advantage of existing, available information and, therefore.. we see<br />

the Portland Water Bu re au as being actively involved in the study. Mr. Rich Holton, <strong>EIS</strong> U. S. Department of Energy<br />

JUL 2 3 1986 O, si<br />

Regardless of the approach or scope for the study of downstream impacts, our<br />

Richland Operations Office<br />

He must be conside d in the evaluation of <strong>Hanford</strong> waste disposal options. P. 0. Be. 550<br />

3.2.4.1 We are the largest purveyor of drinking water in Oregon, providing drinking Richland; WA 99352<br />

.water. to one-third of Oregon's population. Even the potential for Permanent<br />

contamination re of current or futu water supplies of the Portland metropolitan<br />

Dear Mr. Holton:<br />

-<br />

area p sents a threat to re the long-term viability of the gion.<br />

i.<br />

The City of Lewiston appreciates this opportunity to ga<br />

- We very much want to be yo s in the u ongoing process. We would be cement mm on o the alternatives aves be ing considered for the permanent<br />

glad to meet with you and your staff 4o further<br />

tliscuss ourconcerns<br />

and Proposal<br />

disposal of defense ẇastes stared <strong>Hanford</strong>. While addresfor<br />

further study:' r ..... we e s our<br />

t.mm onto on theransp transportation of the to the sicu tes<br />

Sincerely.<br />

Our concern Centers on the use of Highway 12 from Lewiston to<br />

Mi la. Montana for the transportation As you know.<br />

Highway<br />

is ay.<br />

a , it and travel w<br />

waa<br />

way. As it follows Mw<br />

the Loch ea River., it its y through<br />

th .Bitterroot Mountams<br />

an a two-lane highway. c ey. Th Potential O ur danger is clear as<br />

Edward Tee ny<br />

one considers delicate The balan c e nature of the mountains,<br />

Administrator river and valley . The Valley's lifestyle, both socially and<br />

economically, are tied to the outdoors. Any disruption to this<br />

ET/MM/sa ^r•^ ^. ^- {,^ balance will have severe implications to Lewiston and the valley.<br />

cc: Mayor Bud Clark JUL 23 1986 We strongly discourage the use of Highway 12 between Lewiston and<br />

Co issioner Dick Bogle<br />

Missoula as the transportation route for the relocating of de-<br />

-<br />

Commissioner Mike Lindberg WM DI'V'ISION fense waste to its permanent location..<br />

Co mm issioner Mild re d Schwab<br />

Co g issioner Margaret Strachan<br />

Thank you for your consideration.<br />

over<br />

no r Victor Atiyeh<br />

Senator Marl 4atfield - Sincerely,<br />

senator Bob :ckwnod<br />

1^J<br />

Rep. Jim Waver<br />

Rep. Ran Wyden.<br />

3 J

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!