EIS-0113_Section_9 - Hanford Site
EIS-0113_Section_9 - Hanford Site
EIS-0113_Section_9 - Hanford Site
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
p<br />
,i<br />
-410579<br />
133 134<br />
-. Mr. Jerry White<br />
July 17, 1986<br />
Paget<br />
t<br />
City' of l,etiision<br />
? io ax os oxv aex ro er<br />
P08TjOFFILE BO% 61]<br />
LEWI6TON. IaFXO B35a1<br />
V<br />
.<br />
computer model of the Portland wellflelds. We anticipate that the study will -<br />
1.) 7e.11<br />
-<br />
have a total cost of $500,000 and require about three years to complete. The<br />
study islimited only to the hydrology and geology of the area influenced by the July 21, 1986<br />
wellfieid and does not even begin to address water quality issues and economic<br />
considerations. The study we are p ro posing that DOE undertake would, in most -<br />
cases. take advantage of existing, available information and, therefore.. we see<br />
the Portland Water Bu re au as being actively involved in the study. Mr. Rich Holton, <strong>EIS</strong> U. S. Department of Energy<br />
JUL 2 3 1986 O, si<br />
Regardless of the approach or scope for the study of downstream impacts, our<br />
Richland Operations Office<br />
He must be conside d in the evaluation of <strong>Hanford</strong> waste disposal options. P. 0. Be. 550<br />
3.2.4.1 We are the largest purveyor of drinking water in Oregon, providing drinking Richland; WA 99352<br />
.water. to one-third of Oregon's population. Even the potential for Permanent<br />
contamination re of current or futu water supplies of the Portland metropolitan<br />
Dear Mr. Holton:<br />
-<br />
area p sents a threat to re the long-term viability of the gion.<br />
i.<br />
The City of Lewiston appreciates this opportunity to ga<br />
- We very much want to be yo s in the u ongoing process. We would be cement mm on o the alternatives aves be ing considered for the permanent<br />
glad to meet with you and your staff 4o further<br />
tliscuss ourconcerns<br />
and Proposal<br />
disposal of defense ẇastes stared <strong>Hanford</strong>. While addresfor<br />
further study:' r ..... we e s our<br />
t.mm onto on theransp transportation of the to the sicu tes<br />
Sincerely.<br />
Our concern Centers on the use of Highway 12 from Lewiston to<br />
Mi la. Montana for the transportation As you know.<br />
Highway<br />
is ay.<br />
a , it and travel w<br />
waa<br />
way. As it follows Mw<br />
the Loch ea River., it its y through<br />
th .Bitterroot Mountams<br />
an a two-lane highway. c ey. Th Potential O ur danger is clear as<br />
Edward Tee ny<br />
one considers delicate The balan c e nature of the mountains,<br />
Administrator river and valley . The Valley's lifestyle, both socially and<br />
economically, are tied to the outdoors. Any disruption to this<br />
ET/MM/sa ^r•^ ^. ^- {,^ balance will have severe implications to Lewiston and the valley.<br />
cc: Mayor Bud Clark JUL 23 1986 We strongly discourage the use of Highway 12 between Lewiston and<br />
Co issioner Dick Bogle<br />
Missoula as the transportation route for the relocating of de-<br />
-<br />
Commissioner Mike Lindberg WM DI'V'ISION fense waste to its permanent location..<br />
Co mm issioner Mild re d Schwab<br />
Co g issioner Margaret Strachan<br />
Thank you for your consideration.<br />
over<br />
no r Victor Atiyeh<br />
Senator Marl 4atfield - Sincerely,<br />
senator Bob :ckwnod<br />
1^J<br />
Rep. Jim Waver<br />
Rep. Ran Wyden.<br />
3 J