on the localisation in the superimposed soundfield - Hauptmikrofon ...

18
clearly detectable
just about detectable
Figure 8:
Overview of results, see text
2. The attributes’ dependency onto the test signals is apparent from the overview
of the results given in Figure 8. The test signals have been sorted along the
abscissa in such a way that an in/decreasing trend in terms of the attribute
ratings results (the curves at the bottom of Figure 8 depict the corresponding
standard deviations). As can clearly be seen, for all reproduction scenarios that
cannot produce phantom sources (test signals A4, B4, B3, B2), the comb filter
effects at the ears are clearly detectable. On the other hand, one can see that in
the case of an error-free reproduction the auditory event clearly moves and that
the spectral changes at the ears are hardly detectable (test signal A1).
3. Compared to test signal C2, however, it has to be noted that when reproducing
the ear signals stemming from a real sound source that moves within an
angular range of ±30° over the artificial head system, a smaller Ri and a larger
Kl result for the phantom source compared to the real source (see also Figure 9).