Flooding South Lebanon - Human Rights Watch
Flooding South Lebanon - Human Rights Watch
Flooding South Lebanon - Human Rights Watch
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
that would confirm that these weapons were in practice used in a manner consistent<br />
with this military rationale.” 329<br />
The Special Rapporteurs noted that some Israeli officials denied the allegation that the<br />
majority of cluster munitions were fired in the last 72 hours, while others said there<br />
was a gradual crescendo in use of cluster munitions in the last 10 days. 330 The panel<br />
concluded, “If proven, the widely reported claim that the great majority of these<br />
bombs were dropped in the final 72 hours of the campaign, when a ceasefire was<br />
imminent, would indicate an intention to inhibit and prevent the return of civilians and<br />
a reckless disregard for the predictable civilian casualties that have occurred.” 331<br />
The Special Rapporteurs concluded that “the use of cluster munitions was inconsistent<br />
with principles of distinction and proportionality.… In effect, then, the decision was<br />
taken to blanket an area occupied by large numbers of civilians with small and volatile<br />
explosives. The impact of these bomblets would obviously be indiscriminate and the<br />
incidental effects on civilians would almost certainly be disproportionate.” 332<br />
The report also concluded that the international community should “take urgent action<br />
to add cluster munitions to the list of weapons banned under international law.” 333<br />
After hearing from the Special Rapporteurs, the UN <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> Council charged a<br />
separate, special UN Commission of Inquiry (COI) with investigating possible<br />
violations of human rights and humanitarian law by Israel in <strong>Lebanon</strong>. 334 The COI<br />
released a report in November 2006 describing the attacks as indiscriminate and<br />
disproportionate, finding that Israel’s use of cluster munitions “was excessive and<br />
329 Ibid., p. 13.<br />
330 Ibid., p. 14.<br />
331 Ibid., p. 25.<br />
332 Ibid., p. 13.<br />
333 Ibid., pp. 24-25.<br />
334 In 2006, <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> <strong>Watch</strong> called for the establishment of an independent and impartial Commission of Inquiry to<br />
investigate violations committed by all sides in the Israel-Hezbollah conflict. “Israel: Government Committee Should Probe<br />
<strong>Lebanon</strong> Laws of War Violations,” <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> <strong>Watch</strong> news release, September 22, 2006,<br />
http://hrw.org/english/docs/2006/09/22/isrlpa14250.htm. However, the <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> Council limited the mandate of the<br />
Commission of Inquiry to investigating violations committed by Israeli forces, and not violations committed by Hezbollah.<br />
101<br />
<strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> <strong>Watch</strong> February 2008