SAHR 2007 - Health Systems Trust
SAHR 2007 - Health Systems Trust
SAHR 2007 - Health Systems Trust
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Demographic Impact of HIV/AIDS in South Africa” report was<br />
released by the Centre for Actuarial Research, ASSA and<br />
the MRC [HIV Indicators 2006]. The ASSA2003 AIDS and<br />
Demographic model now estimates that 5.4 million South<br />
Africans are HIV-positive and 600 000 have AIDS in mid-<br />
2006. Prevalence is reaching a plateau in most provinces,<br />
albeit at different levels. The report also predicts that ART<br />
can still have a significant effect on reducing the number<br />
of AIDS deaths. Without ART the model predicts about<br />
505 000 deaths a year by 2010. With ART offered at the<br />
level assumed by the model (50% coverage), this would be<br />
reduced to about 388 000 deaths a year. If 90% of patients<br />
requiring treatment are reached, the death toll could be as<br />
low as 291 000 a year. Importantly, the report estimates that,<br />
as at the middle of 2006, 225 000 people were on ART, out<br />
of about 711 000 needing treatment at that time. The scale<br />
of the challenge is underlined by the prediction that, if 90%<br />
treatment coverage is to be maintained, there will be over 2<br />
million on ART by 2015 (Figure 10).<br />
The annual antenatal survey of HIV prevalence remains a<br />
key input into many processes. This year a major step was<br />
taken when results were disaggregated to district level for<br />
the other provinces in addition to WC. This allows for more<br />
detailed comparisons of the results from routine data collection<br />
(such as the DHIS) and various surveys. It also required<br />
major changes to the sampling process. The overall sample<br />
was doubled to 36 000. Sentinel sites were chosen using<br />
the Probability Proportional to Size (PPS) sampling method,<br />
in which a stratified proportional sample was drawn and<br />
the sample size was proportionally allocated to each facility<br />
using antenatal clinic attendance data, providing a selfweighting<br />
sample for each district. In order to be eligible, the<br />
facility had to routinely draw blood from antenatal attendees<br />
and have the ability to store the sample at 4 o C. In addition,<br />
routine DHIS data needed to show that a minimum of 20<br />
subjects would be recruited over a period of a month. Finally,<br />
the facility needed access to transport that would allow for<br />
samples to be taken to a laboratory within 24 hours if there<br />
is no centrifuge in the facility or within 72 hours if the samples<br />
could be centrifuged on site.<br />
It has been known that provincial averages mask substantial<br />
differences between districts, and the WC data [Antenatal<br />
Survey 2005 WC] show big differences even within one<br />
district, such as the high of 32.6 in Khayelitsha and a low<br />
of 5.1 in Mitchell’s Plain, within the City of Cape Town metro.<br />
Figure 11 shows the provincial results from DHIS and the<br />
annual survey, while Figure 12 displays the district results,<br />
supplemented by Map 1 and Map 2. In general the DHIS<br />
and antenatal survey data show similar trends, with the<br />
survey data on average 5.4 percentage points higher (a<br />
23% increase over DHIS values). In KZN however the survey<br />
results are on average 13% higher (a 50% increase over<br />
DHIS values), whereas the WC results are in general more<br />
closely matched. Across districts, estimates of HIV prevalence<br />
from the antenatal survey range from 5.3% in Namakwa<br />
(NC) to 46.0% in Amajuba (KZN).<br />
Figure 10: Projected numbers receiving treatment by level of coverage of national ART programme<br />
2 500 000<br />
2 000 000<br />
Numbers on ART<br />
1 500 000<br />
1 000 000<br />
500 000<br />
0<br />
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 <strong>2007</strong> 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015<br />
Year<br />
20% ART coverage 50% ART coverage 90% ART coverage<br />
Source: HIV Indicators 2006.<br />
246