Opening Remarks, Frank McCartney

First, state the problem: We recognize Congress’ unwillingness to increase the federal
gas tax because of the wave of reformers calling for fiscal responsibility.
Second, introduce the solution: The toll industry is prepared to relieve lawmakers of
this burden by assuming the mantle of leadership in transportation funding and
financing.
Third, explain why the solution has merit: Tolling is a way to rebuild our nation’s
infrastructure without having to raise the gas tax – and the implementation of tolling is
much easier now.
Finally, don’t forget the “ask.” End with a call to action: Give us the flexibility to do it!
Remove the legal, political and institutional barriers that prevent states from tolling
interstate highways.
The is our opportunity to tell legislators why tolling is a worthy alternative to the federal
gas tax. Note, I said a worthy alternative and not the worthy alternative. Tolling is not the
answer in every case, but it is a fair, reliable, time-tested way to fund, develop, and operate
road infrastructure. The country has not begun to tap into its full potential, and we must if
we are to save our infrastructure. The second tool for meeting my challenge of making the
difference is printed on the back of a one-dollar bill.
After declaring independence from England, the Continental Congress appointed
Benjamin Franklin, John Adams and Thomas Jefferson to devise a motto for the United
States. They selected e pluribus unum. Pluribus is related to the English word “plural.”
Unum is related to the English word “unit.”
An accurate translation of the motto is “Out of many, one.” E pluribus unum then
describes a place where unity and individuality coexist. A place like IBTTA.
From our diverse membership of approximately 250 organizations worldwide, we find
common ground, common opinions and popular approaches and we amplify them using
one voice.
Let me tell you how one IBTTA member has already put the “e pluribus unum” strategy to
work …
In early February, the Illinois Tollway learned of a proposed regulation by the Securities
and Exchange Commission. The proposal would consider appointed members of public
boards as “municipal advisers,” making them subject to various registration requirements
3