Form 5a - ICP Forests
Form 5a - ICP Forests
Form 5a - ICP Forests
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Code defoliation score<br />
60 >55-60%<br />
65 >60-65%<br />
70 >65-70%<br />
75 >70-75%<br />
80 >75-80%<br />
85 >80-85%<br />
90 >85-90%<br />
95 >90-95%<br />
99 >95-10 – 25%<br />
2 moderate >25 – 60%<br />
3 severe >60%<br />
4 dead dead<br />
(27) Foliage transparency D_FOLIAGE_TRANSPARANCY<br />
(Chapter 2)<br />
Estimate foliage transparency in 5% classes based on the live, normally foliated portion<br />
of the crown and branches using the transparency diagram in Fig. A1-2. Dead branches,<br />
crown dieback and missing branches where foliage is expected to be missing are deleted<br />
from the estimate (Fig. A1-3).<br />
(28) Flowering D_FLOWERING<br />
(Chapter 2)<br />
Two assessments are made: of the assessable part of the crown and of the whole crown.<br />
Scoring is:<br />
1 Absent or scarce. The flowers are not seen in a cursory examination.<br />
2 Common. Flowering effect is clearly visible.<br />
3 Abundant. Flowering dominates the appearance of the tree.<br />
(29) Fruiting D_FRUITING<br />
(Chapter 2)<br />
As with flowering, two assessments are made: of the assessable part of the crown and of<br />
the whole crown. Scoring is:<br />
1 Absent or scarce. The fruits are not seen in a cursory examination.<br />
2 Common. Fruiting is clearly visible.<br />
3 Abundant. Fruiting dominates the appearance of the tree.<br />
Page 85 / 151
Change language