thesis - Faculty of Information and Communication Technologies ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

References [190] T. J. McCabe. A Complexity Measure. IEEE Transaction on Software Engineering, 2(4):308–320, Dec. 1976. [191] J. Mendel. Tutorial on Higher-Order Statistics (Spectra) in Signal Processing and System Theory: Theoretical Results and Some Applications. Proceedings of the IEEE, 79(3):278–305, 1991. [192] T. Mens and S. Demeyer, editors. Software Evolution. Springer, 2008. [193] T. Mens, J. Fernandez-Ramil, and S. Degrandsart. The Evolution of Eclipse. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance (ICSM 2008), pages 386–395, 2008. [194] T. Mens, J. F. Ramil, and M. W. Godfrey. Analyzing the Evolution of Large-Scale Software: Issue Overview. Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution: Research and Practice, 16(6):363– 365, Nov. 2004. [195] E. Merlo, G. Antoniol, M. Di Penta, and V. Rollo. Linear Complexity Object-Oriented Similarity for Clone Detection and Software Evolution Analyses. In Proceedings of the 20th IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance (ICSM 2004), pages 412–416, 2004. [196] Metrics Plugin for Eclipse IDE. http://metrics.sourceforge. net/, 2010. [197] S. Milgram. Obedience to Authority: an Experimental View. Taylor & Francis, 1974. [198] R. Mittermeir. Software Evolution: Let’s Sharpen the Terminology Before Sharpening (Out-Of-Scope) Tools. In Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Principles of Software Evolution, pages 114–121. ACM New York, NY, USA, 2001. [199] A. Mockus and J. Herbsleb. Why Not Improve Coordination in Distributed Software Development by Stealing Good Ideas from Open Source? In International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE 2002, 2002. [200] A. Mockus, R. T Fielfding, and J. D Herbsleb. Two Case Studies of Open Source Software Development: Apache and Mozilla. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 11(3):309–346, 2002. [201] A. Mockus and D. Weiss. Predicting Risk of Software Changes. Bell Labs Technical Journal, 5(2):169–180, 2002. 223
References [202] J. Moon and L. Sproull. Essence of Distributed Work: The Case of the Linux Kernel. Distributed Work, pages 381–404, 2002. [203] RSM Tool, M-Squared Technologies. http:// msquaredtechnologies.com/, 2010. [204] A. Murgia, G. Concas, S. Pinna, R. Tonelli, and I. Turnu. Empirical Study of Software Quality Evolution in Open Source Projects Using Agile Practices. Arxiv preprint arXiv:0905.3287, 2009. [205] N. Nagappan, T. Ball, and A. Zeller. Mining Metrics to Predict Component Failures. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Software Engineering, pages 452–461. ACM New York, NY, USA, 2006. [206] K. Nakakoji, Y. Yamamoto, K. Kishida, and Y. Ye. Evolution Patterns of Open Source Software Systems and Communities. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Principles of Software Evolution, pages 76–85. ACM Press New York, 2002. [207] J. Nash. Directions for Open Source Software Over the Next Decade. Futures, 42(4):427–433, 2009. [208] E. Nasseri, S. Counsell, and M. Shepperd. Class Movement and Re-Location: an Empirical Study of Java Inheritance Evolution. Journal of Systems and Software, 2009. [209] M. Newman. The Structure and Function of Complex Networks. Arxiv preprint cond-mat/0303516, 2003. [210] M. Newman. Power Laws, Pareto Distributions and Zipf’s Law. Contemporary physics, 46(5):323–352, 2005. [211] A. Offutt. Investigations of the Software Testing Coupling Effect. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (TOSEM), 1(1):5–20, 1992. [212] A. Offutt and R. Untch. Mutation 2000: Uniting the Orthogonal. In Mutation Testing for the New Century, page 44. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001. [213] H. Olague, L. Etzkorn, S. Gholston, and S. Quattlebaum. Empirical Validation of Three Software Metrics Suites to Predict Fault- Proneness of Object-Oriented Classes Developed Using Highly Iterative or Agile Software Development Processes. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 33(6):402–419, 2007. 224
Page 1 and 2:
Growth and Change Dynamics in Open
Page 3 and 4:
Dedicated to all my teachers ii
Page 5 and 6:
Declaration I declare that this the
Page 7 and 8:
7. R. Vasa, M. Lumpe, P. Branch, an
Page 9 and 10:
Contents 3.4 Selection Criteria . .
Page 11 and 12:
Contents 5.4.5 Identifying Change u
Page 13 and 14:
Contents 7.2.2 Software Metric Tool
Page 15 and 16:
List of Figures 4.7 Class diagram s
Page 17 and 18:
List of Figures 6.9 Probability of
Page 19 and 20:
List of Tables 5.2 Spearman’s Ran
Page 21 and 22:
Chapter 1. Introduction in the laws
Page 23 and 24:
Chapter 1. Introduction models that
Page 25 and 26:
Chapter 1. Introduction compute at
Page 27 and 28:
Chapter 1. Introduction undergo con
Page 29 and 30:
Chapter 2 Software Evolution How do
Page 31 and 32:
Chapter 2. Software Evolution Proce
Page 33 and 34:
Chapter 2. Software Evolution Softw
Page 35 and 36:
Chapter 2. Software Evolution devel
Page 37 and 38:
Chapter 2. Software Evolution [59,
Page 39 and 40:
Chapter 2. Software Evolution These
Page 41 and 42:
Chapter 2. Software Evolution and C
Page 43 and 44:
Chapter 2. Software Evolution Tursk
Page 45 and 46:
Chapter 2. Software Evolution nenti
Page 47 and 48:
Chapter 2. Software Evolution The o
Page 49 and 50:
Chapter 2. Software Evolution used
Page 51 and 52:
Chapter 2. Software Evolution durin
Page 53 and 54:
Chapter 2. Software Evolution added
Page 55 and 56:
Chapter 2. Software Evolution that
Page 57 and 58:
Chapter 2. Software Evolution the c
Page 59 and 60:
Chapter 2. Software Evolution The q
Page 61 and 62:
Chapter 3. Data Selection Methodolo
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Chapter 4 Measuring Evolving Softwa
Page 81 and 82:
Chapter 4. Measuring Evolving Softw
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Chapter 5 Growth Dynamics Current m
Page 111 and 112:
Chapter 5. Growth Dynamics used to
Page 113 and 114:
Chapter 5. Growth Dynamics mean, me
Page 115 and 116:
Chapter 5. Growth Dynamics bution p
Page 117 and 118:
Chapter 5. Growth Dynamics Though,
Page 119 and 120:
Chapter 5. Growth Dynamics Figure 5
Page 121 and 122:
Chapter 5. Growth Dynamics 5.2.4 Ap
Page 123 and 124:
Chapter 5. Growth Dynamics measure
Page 125 and 126:
Chapter 5. Growth Dynamics 5.3.1) [
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Chapter 5. Growth Dynamics • The
Page 131 and 132:
Chapter 5. Growth Dynamics 50.0% 45
Page 133 and 134:
Chapter 5. Growth Dynamics Metric M
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Chapter 5. Growth Dynamics ber of M
Page 139 and 140:
Chapter 5. Growth Dynamics Spearman
Page 141 and 142:
Chapter 5. Growth Dynamics Spearman
Page 143 and 144:
Chapter 5. Growth Dynamics as exist
Page 145 and 146:
Chapter 5. Growth Dynamics sented i
Page 147 and 148:
Chapter 5. Growth Dynamics System M
Page 149 and 150:
Chapter 5. Growth Dynamics populati
Page 151 and 152:
Chapter 5. Growth Dynamics abstract
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Chapter 5. Growth Dynamics Another
Page 157 and 158:
Chapter 6 Change Dynamics It is a w
Page 159 and 160:
Chapter 6. Change Dynamics 6.1 Dete
Page 161 and 162:
Chapter 6. Change Dynamics often ma
Page 163 and 164:
Chapter 6. Change Dynamics The set
Page 165 and 166:
Chapter 6. Change Dynamics analysis
Page 167 and 168:
10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32
Page 169 and 170:
Chapter 6. Change Dynamics Age (Day
Page 171 and 172:
Chapter 6. Change Dynamics erties h
Page 173 and 174:
Chapter 6. Change Dynamics 100% 90%
Page 175 and 176:
Chapter 6. Change Dynamics the meas
Page 177 and 178:
Chapter 6. Change Dynamics 50.0% 45
Page 179 and 180:
Chapter 6. Change Dynamics Figure 6
Page 181 and 182:
Chapter 6. Change Dynamics new clas
Page 183 and 184:
Chapter 6. Change Dynamics We obser
Page 185 and 186:
Chapter 6. Change Dynamics the chan
Page 187 and 188:
Chapter 6. Change Dynamics other en
Page 189 and 190:
Chapter 6. Change Dynamics 6.3.4 Po
Page 191 and 192: Chapter 6. Change Dynamics stance,
Page 193 and 194: Chapter 6. Change Dynamics ing a lo
Page 195 and 196: Chapter 6. Change Dynamics Lanza et
Page 197 and 198: Chapter 6. Change Dynamics smells t
Page 199 and 200: Chapter 6. Change Dynamics growth i
Page 201 and 202: Chapter 7. Implications ically, we
Page 203 and 204: Chapter 7. Implications overall str
Page 205 and 206: Chapter 7. Implications contain new
Page 207 and 208: Chapter 7. Implications ciently bro
Page 209 and 210: Chapter 7. Implications tional supp
Page 211 and 212: Chapter 7. Implications where a sof
Page 213 and 214: Chapter 8. Conclusions • We prese
Page 215: Chapter 8. Conclusions [302], and g
Page 218 and 219: Appendix A Meta Data Collected for
Page 220 and 221: Appendix C Mapping between Metrics
Page 222 and 223: Chapter D. Metric Extraction Illust
Page 224 and 225: Appendix F Change Dynamics Data Fil
Page 226 and 227: References [1] S. Alam and P. Duger
Page 228 and 229: References Software. In Proceedings
Page 230 and 231: References [43] N. Chapin, J. Hale,
Page 232 and 233: References [68] M. Di Penta, L. Cer
Page 234 and 235: References [91] C. Gini. Measuremen
Page 236 and 237: References [115] I. Held. The Scien
Page 238 and 239: References [140] H. Kagdi, S. Yusuf
Page 240 and 241: References [164] M. Lanza, H. Gall,
Page 244 and 245: References [214] H. Olague, L. Etzk
Page 246 and 247: References [242] C. Roy, J. Cordy,
Page 248 and 249: References [266] G. Succi, W. Pedry
Page 250 and 251: References ECOOP Workshop on Quanti
Page 252: References [315] T. Zimmermann, V.
show all

thesis - Faculty of Information and Communication Technologies ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?