CIAB Market & Policy developments 2005/06 - IEA
CIAB Market & Policy developments 2005/06 - IEA
CIAB Market & Policy developments 2005/06 - IEA
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
4 ISSUES RELATED TO COAL<br />
4.1 Sustaining the Role of Coal<br />
183. The <strong>IEA</strong> has forecast that total energy demand over the next twenty five years will<br />
increase by 55%. In order to maintain a stable and affordable energy supply whilst<br />
keeping economic, social and environmental objectives in balance, it is essential that<br />
energy be obtained from a wide variety of sources.<br />
184. A compelling economic and social case can be made for sustaining the role of coal in the<br />
future energy mix, given that it is an affordable, reliable and secure source of energy. All<br />
fossil fuels must address the challenge of climate change – most important for coal<br />
because it is the most carbon intensive fossil fuel. The following paragraphs highlight<br />
recent <strong>developments</strong> that reflect the challenge which has been accepted by the industry<br />
and governments to reduce the emissions from the use of coal in fulfilling its role in the<br />
future energy mix.<br />
4.1.1 <strong>Policy</strong> and the Role of Coal<br />
United States of America<br />
Coal to Liquids and the Energy Bill of 2007<br />
185. Interest in developing a coal to liquids industry in the United States of America remains<br />
strong despite the lack of positive Congressional action needed to accelerate the<br />
advancement of this new industry. Although there is bipartisan interest in using domestic<br />
coal to give the nation a greater degree of energy independence and thus more security<br />
from an energy and economic view point, partisan politics have dominated the debate<br />
throughout 2007. During Senate floor consideration of the CLEAN Energy Act of 2007,<br />
two amendments that would have encouraged the financing and construction of<br />
domestic coal to liquid facilities were lost. Although collectively one or both amendments<br />
were supported by 60 Senators, neither had enough votes to attain final passage and<br />
they were not included in the Senate passed energy bill. Leadership in the House<br />
refused to consider any substantive coal-related provisions in its version of the energy<br />
bill with concerns raised about the relationship of coal to liquids facilities and climate<br />
change policy.<br />
186. The industry Coal to Liquids Coalition will continue to work with this Administration and<br />
with the Congress to secure passage of meaningful CTL incentives that do not include<br />
carbon capture and storage requirements that are technically and/or economically<br />
infeasible.<br />
187. The Senate and House passed energy bills went to conference and passed in the last<br />
days of 2007. The final bill is oriented toward conservation, efficiency and renewables.<br />
Although the final bill does not include a renewable energy portfolio standard, it does<br />
little to support traditional fossil fuels. The legislation does not include any pro-coal<br />
provisions.<br />
Energy <strong>Policy</strong> Act <strong>2005</strong><br />
188. Full implementation of the <strong>2005</strong> Energy <strong>Policy</strong> Act, the most comprehensive energy bill in<br />
a decade, remains important for coal. Its provisions are designed to expand quantity and<br />
diversity of US energy supplies as well as enhance the efficiency with which energy is<br />
used. Coal specific provisions included authorisation for basic coal and coal combustion<br />
- 31 -