21.01.2014 Views

CIAB Market & Policy developments 2005/06 - IEA

CIAB Market & Policy developments 2005/06 - IEA

CIAB Market & Policy developments 2005/06 - IEA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4 ISSUES RELATED TO COAL<br />

4.1 Sustaining the Role of Coal<br />

183. The <strong>IEA</strong> has forecast that total energy demand over the next twenty five years will<br />

increase by 55%. In order to maintain a stable and affordable energy supply whilst<br />

keeping economic, social and environmental objectives in balance, it is essential that<br />

energy be obtained from a wide variety of sources.<br />

184. A compelling economic and social case can be made for sustaining the role of coal in the<br />

future energy mix, given that it is an affordable, reliable and secure source of energy. All<br />

fossil fuels must address the challenge of climate change – most important for coal<br />

because it is the most carbon intensive fossil fuel. The following paragraphs highlight<br />

recent <strong>developments</strong> that reflect the challenge which has been accepted by the industry<br />

and governments to reduce the emissions from the use of coal in fulfilling its role in the<br />

future energy mix.<br />

4.1.1 <strong>Policy</strong> and the Role of Coal<br />

United States of America<br />

Coal to Liquids and the Energy Bill of 2007<br />

185. Interest in developing a coal to liquids industry in the United States of America remains<br />

strong despite the lack of positive Congressional action needed to accelerate the<br />

advancement of this new industry. Although there is bipartisan interest in using domestic<br />

coal to give the nation a greater degree of energy independence and thus more security<br />

from an energy and economic view point, partisan politics have dominated the debate<br />

throughout 2007. During Senate floor consideration of the CLEAN Energy Act of 2007,<br />

two amendments that would have encouraged the financing and construction of<br />

domestic coal to liquid facilities were lost. Although collectively one or both amendments<br />

were supported by 60 Senators, neither had enough votes to attain final passage and<br />

they were not included in the Senate passed energy bill. Leadership in the House<br />

refused to consider any substantive coal-related provisions in its version of the energy<br />

bill with concerns raised about the relationship of coal to liquids facilities and climate<br />

change policy.<br />

186. The industry Coal to Liquids Coalition will continue to work with this Administration and<br />

with the Congress to secure passage of meaningful CTL incentives that do not include<br />

carbon capture and storage requirements that are technically and/or economically<br />

infeasible.<br />

187. The Senate and House passed energy bills went to conference and passed in the last<br />

days of 2007. The final bill is oriented toward conservation, efficiency and renewables.<br />

Although the final bill does not include a renewable energy portfolio standard, it does<br />

little to support traditional fossil fuels. The legislation does not include any pro-coal<br />

provisions.<br />

Energy <strong>Policy</strong> Act <strong>2005</strong><br />

188. Full implementation of the <strong>2005</strong> Energy <strong>Policy</strong> Act, the most comprehensive energy bill in<br />

a decade, remains important for coal. Its provisions are designed to expand quantity and<br />

diversity of US energy supplies as well as enhance the efficiency with which energy is<br />

used. Coal specific provisions included authorisation for basic coal and coal combustion<br />

- 31 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!