21.01.2014 Views

CIAB Market & Policy developments 2005/06 - IEA

CIAB Market & Policy developments 2005/06 - IEA

CIAB Market & Policy developments 2005/06 - IEA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

196. States are taking independent action. In California, laws have been passed requiring that<br />

regulated utilities must meet a new standard of 1100 lbs/MWh (approx. 500kg/kWh) of<br />

CO 2 emissions in new long term agreements. Washington State recently enacted similar<br />

requirements. Firms in Interconnected States selling electricity into the California market<br />

are now looking at the implications for contracts.<br />

197. Efficiency increases for existing and new electricity plant is in debate but not at the<br />

forefront. The main CCS focus is now on large scale projects (>1 million tons p.a.) in<br />

multiple geologies. Seven regional proposals to the DOE are pending.<br />

198. Most language is not aimed just at IGCC, but at any process (e.g. pulverised fuel plus<br />

CCS, Oxyfuel firing etc.) that allows CCS. EPRI analysis indicates that to aggressively<br />

reduce CO 2 emissions will require use of all the technology options (increased end-use<br />

efficiency, renewable energy, nuclear power, increased coal-fired generation efficiency,<br />

CCS and hybrid vehicles) and that R&D plus demonstration and deployment support is<br />

inadequate.<br />

199. An August 2007 EPRI study “The Power to Reduce CO2 Emissions – The Full Portfolio”<br />

(http://epri-reports.org/DiscussionPaper2007.pdf) concluded that a projected cost of $1.8<br />

trillion to dramatically reduce CO 2 emissions by 2050 could be halved by spending $1.4<br />

billion each year to 2030 for research and development on a range of technologies, with<br />

almost half the expenditure going towards research into advanced coal technology and<br />

carbon capture and storage.<br />

Canada<br />

200. Energy policy is market-based and oriented towards sustainable development. A major<br />

goal is to achieve both environmental and economic excellence in any energy project<br />

brought to market. Canada’s Energy <strong>Policy</strong> has three main objectives:<br />

• Security – ensure access to affordable, reliable and secure sources of energy;<br />

• Prosperity - ensure that the energy industry contributes to the prosperity and<br />

quality of life for all Canadians; and<br />

• Environment - ensure that environmental considerations are always considered<br />

when developing energy projects.<br />

201. It is supported by four key principles:<br />

• Reliance on the market to allocate resources - Prices are established and<br />

investment decisions must be governed by a competitive energy market under<br />

the auspices of the NAFTA framework.<br />

• Respect for Jurisdiction - Energy and other resources are owned by the<br />

Provinces in which they are located. Each Province must develop its own Energy<br />

<strong>Policy</strong>. (Alberta, with its predominately carbon based economy, has its own Coal<br />

<strong>Policy</strong>).<br />

• Regulation - Regulation as required to ensure that the markets work.<br />

• Targeted Investment - Investment to supply necessities when the market will not<br />

respond to demand.<br />

202. New challenges are emerging, with security concerns higher than they have ever been.<br />

A review is considering refocusing policy initiatives around at-home investment, energy<br />

efficiency and emergency preparedness.<br />

203. New CO 2 emissions policies were introduced in the first half of 20<strong>06</strong>, involving a 6% per<br />

- 33 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!