22.01.2014 Views

Waveguides - ieeetsu

Waveguides - ieeetsu

Waveguides - ieeetsu

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

www.ece.rutgers.edu/∼orfanidi/ewa 261<br />

262 Electromagnetic Waves & Antennas – S. J. Orfanidis – June 21, 2004<br />

∫<br />

P T = P z dS ,<br />

S<br />

where P z = 1 2 Re(E × H∗ )·ẑ (8.2.1)<br />

It is easily verified that only the transverse components of the fields contribute to<br />

the power flow, that is, P z can be written in the form:<br />

Fig. 8.1.1<br />

Cylindrical coordinates.<br />

(<br />

1 ∂<br />

ρ ∂E )<br />

z<br />

+ 1 ∂ 2 E z<br />

ρ ∂ρ ∂ρ ρ 2 ∂φ + 2 k2 cE z = 0<br />

(<br />

1 ∂<br />

ρ ∂H )<br />

z<br />

+ 1 ∂ 2 H z<br />

ρ ∂ρ ∂ρ ρ 2 ∂φ + 2 k2 c H z = 0<br />

(8.1.23)<br />

P z = 1 2 Re(E T × H ∗ T )·ẑ (8.2.2)<br />

For waveguides with conducting walls, the transmission losses are due primarily to<br />

ohmic losses in (a) the conductors and (b) the dielectric medium filling the space between<br />

the conductors and in which the fields propagate. In dielectric waveguides the losses<br />

are due to absorption and scattering by imperfections.<br />

The transmission losses can be quantified by replacing the propagation wavenumber<br />

β by its complex-valued version β c = β − jα, where α is the attenuation constant. The<br />

z-dependence of all the field components is replaced by:<br />

Noting that ẑ × ˆρ = ˆφ and ẑ × ˆφ =−ˆρ, we obtain:<br />

ẑ ×∇ T H z = ˆφ(∂ ρ H z )−ˆρ 1 ρ (∂ φH z )<br />

The decomposition of a transverse vector is E T = ˆρE ρ + ˆφE φ . The cylindrical<br />

coordinates version of (8.1.16) are:<br />

E ρ =− jβ ( 1<br />

∂ρ<br />

k 2 E z − η TE<br />

c<br />

ρ ∂ )<br />

φH z<br />

E φ =− jβ ( 1<br />

k 2 c ρ ∂ ) ,<br />

φE z + η TE ∂ ρ H z<br />

H ρ =− jβ (<br />

∂ρ<br />

kc<br />

2 H z + 1<br />

η TM ρ ∂ )<br />

φE z<br />

H φ =− jβ ( 1<br />

kc<br />

2 ρ ∂ φH z − 1 )<br />

∂ ρ E z<br />

η TM<br />

(8.1.24)<br />

For either coordinate system, the equations for H T may be obtained from those of<br />

E T by a so-called duality transformation, that is, making the substitutions:<br />

E → H , H →−E , ɛ → µ, µ→ ɛ (duality transformation) (8.1.25)<br />

These imply that η → η −1 and η TE → η −1<br />

TM. Duality is discussed in greater detail in<br />

Sec. 16.2.<br />

8.2 Power Transfer and Attenuation<br />

With the field solutions at hand, one can determine the amount of power transmitted<br />

along the guide, as well as the transmission losses. The total power carried by the fields<br />

along the guide direction is obtained by integrating the z-component of the Poynting<br />

vector over the cross-sectional area of the guide:<br />

e −jβz → e −jβcz = e −(α+jβ)z = e −αz e −jβz (8.2.3)<br />

The quantity α is the sum of the attenuation constants arising from the various loss<br />

mechanisms. For example, if α d and α c are the attenuations due to the ohmic losses in<br />

the dielectric and in the conducting walls, then<br />

α = α d + α c (8.2.4)<br />

The ohmic losses in the dielectric can be characterized either by its loss tangent, say<br />

tan δ, or by its conductivity σ d —the two being related by σ d = ωɛ tan δ. The effective<br />

dielectric constant of the medium is then ɛ(ω)= ɛ − jσ d /ω = ɛ(1 − j tan δ). The<br />

corresponding complex-valued wavenumber β c is obtained by the replacement:<br />

β =<br />

√<br />

ω 2 µɛ − k 2 c → β c =<br />

√<br />

ω 2 µɛ(ω)−k 2 c<br />

For weakly conducting dielectrics, we may make the approximation:<br />

√<br />

β c =<br />

ω 2 µɛ ( 1 − j σ d<br />

ωɛ<br />

) √<br />

√<br />

− k<br />

2<br />

c = β 2 − jωµσ d = β 1 − j ωµσ d<br />

≃ β − j 1 β 2<br />

2 σ ωµ<br />

d<br />

β<br />

Recalling the definition η TE = ωµ/β, we obtain for the attenuation constant:<br />

α d = 1 2 σ dη TE = 1 2<br />

ω 2<br />

βc 2 tan δ =<br />

ω tan δ<br />

√1<br />

(dielectric losses) (8.2.5)<br />

2c − ω 2 c/ω 2<br />

which is similar to Eq. (2.7.2), but with the replacement η d → η TE .<br />

The conductor losses are more complicated to calculate. In practice, the following<br />

approximate procedure is adequate. First, the fields are determined on the assumption<br />

that the conductors are perfect.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!