24.01.2014 Views

Sustainable Public Procurement: Towards a low‐carbon economy

Sustainable Public Procurement: Towards a low‐carbon economy

Sustainable Public Procurement: Towards a low‐carbon economy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

88 <strong>Sustainable</strong> <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Procurement</strong>: <strong>Towards</strong> a low carbon <strong>economy</strong><br />

between different government policies creates obstacles in<br />

making energy efficient procurement choices.<br />

Overarching Policy or Targeted Initiatives<br />

Sustainability in public procurement is not something that can be<br />

achieved by way of an overarching or blanket policy. The value of<br />

customisation or tailoring of sector specific or even firm specific<br />

measures for enabling the adoption sustainability criteria such as<br />

energy efficiency is crucial to the long-term sustainability of such<br />

a development. Another noteworthy observation, is that<br />

companies which had environmental concern institutionalised or<br />

had a laid down environmental policy appeared better suited and<br />

relatively better prepared to change their procurement practices<br />

to SPP, substantiates this point. One of the most important<br />

points that emerged from our research and discussions was that<br />

while goals need to be articulated in policy documents (both<br />

government and company level) for the implementation of energy<br />

efficiency criteria in the public procurement process, the nuances<br />

in implementation vary from product to product and industry to<br />

industry. In order to address sector or even firm specific<br />

application of SPP, it is important to explore the cumulative<br />

impact of the internal and external factors on enabling<br />

procurement choices internalising energy efficiency factors in the<br />

choice of goods.<br />

The adoption of energy efficiency as a measure in public<br />

procurement is a win-win situation for the companies as while it<br />

leads to a public gain by reducing energy consumption and<br />

therefore, reduced carbon footprint, it also secures private gains<br />

at the firm level. Therefore, its adoption can be justified through<br />

a lifetime cost analysis as against the least financial cost at the<br />

time of purchase. It also helps companies take advantage in terms<br />

of their environmental obligations and commitments. Although<br />

our stakeholders were in agreement with this fact, energy<br />

efficiency was not practiced in their procurement practices<br />

regularly (except a few). This was explained by the fact that given<br />

the current regulatory and company-level scenario, following<br />

energy efficiency criteria may not always be practical.<br />

Our stakeholders recognized that while adopting energy<br />

efficiency as a measure within their procurement processes helps<br />

them become socially responsible, it is also economically<br />

advantageous in the long term. However, as a procuring agency,<br />

practicality and feasibility of the process itself was of critical<br />

T E R I Report No. 2007GL01 88

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!