28.01.2014 Views

Settlers - San Francisco Bay Area Independent Media Center

Settlers - San Francisco Bay Area Independent Media Center

Settlers - San Francisco Bay Area Independent Media Center

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The Charleston conspiracy of 1822, led by Denmark<br />

Vesey (a free carpenter), was an organization of urban<br />

proletarians-stevedores, millers, lumberyard<br />

workers, blacksmiths, etc.. Similarly, the great conspiracy<br />

of 1856 was organized among coal mine, mill and factory<br />

workers across Kentucky and Tennessee. In its failure,<br />

some 65 Afrikans were killed at Senator Bell's iron works<br />

alone. It was particularly alarming to the settlers that those<br />

Afrikans who had been given the advantages of urban living,<br />

and who had skilled positions, just used their relative<br />

mobility to strike at the colonial system all the more effectively.(ll)<br />

From among the ranks of free Afrikans outside<br />

the South came courageous organizers, who moved<br />

through the South like guerrillas leading their brethren to<br />

freedom. And not just a few exceptional leaders, such as<br />

Harriet Tubman; in 1860 we know that five hundred<br />

underground organizers went into the South from Canada<br />

alone. On the plantations the Afrikan masses resisted in a<br />

conscious, political culture. A letter from a Charleston,<br />

S.C. plantation owner in 1844 tells how all the slaves in the<br />

area secretly celebrated every August 1st - the anniversary<br />

of the end of slavery in the British West Indies.(ll)<br />

Abolishing slavery was the commonly proposed<br />

answer to this increasing instability in the colonial system.<br />

The settler bourgeoisie, however, which had immense<br />

capital tied up in slaves, could hardly be expected to take<br />

such a step willingly. One immediate response in the 1830's<br />

was to break up the Afrikan communities in the cities. In<br />

the wake of the Vesey conspiracy, for instance, the<br />

Charleston City Council urged that the number of male<br />

Afrikans in the city "be greatly diminished".(l2) And they<br />

were.<br />

Throughout the South much of the Afrikan<br />

population was gradually shipped back to the plantations,<br />

declining year after year until the Civil War. In New<br />

Orleans the drop was from 50% to 15% of the city population;<br />

in St. Louis from 25% to only 2% of the city population.(l3)<br />

The needs of the new industrial economy were far<br />

less important to the bourgeoisie than breaking up the<br />

dangerous concentrations of oppressed, and regaining a<br />

safe, Euro-Amerikan physical domination over the key urban<br />

centers.<br />

One Northern writer traveling through the South<br />

noted in 1859 that the Afrikans had been learning too<br />

much in the cities: "This has alarmed their masters, and<br />

they are sending them off, as fast as possible, to theplantations<br />

where, as in a tomb, no sight or sound of knowledge<br />

can reach them. "(14) In addition to the physical restrictions,<br />

the mass terror, etc. that we all know were imposed,<br />

it is important to see that settler Amerika reacted to the<br />

growing consciousness of Afrikans by attempting to isolate<br />

and physically break up the oppressed communities. It is a<br />

measure of how strongly the threat of Revolution was rising<br />

in the Afrikan nation that the settlers had to restructure<br />

their society in response. The relative backwardness of the<br />

Southern economy was an expression of the living contradictions<br />

of the slave system.<br />

2. Slavery vs. Settlerism<br />

Slavery had become an obstacle to both the con- awaited, that could only be held by millions of loyal settinued<br />

growth of settler society and the interests of the tlers. After Haiti, it was increasingly obvious that a "thin,<br />

Euro-Amerikan bourgeoisie. It was not that slavery was white line" of a few soldiers, administrators and planters<br />

unprofitable itself. It was, worker for worker, much more could not safely hold down whole oppressed nations. Only<br />

profitable than white wage-labor. Afrikan slaves in in- the weight of masses of oppressors could provide the Eurodustry<br />

cost the capitalists less than one-third the wages of Amerikan bourgeoisie with the Empire they desired. This<br />

white workingmen. Even when slaves were rented from was a fundamental element in the antagonistic, but symanother<br />

capitalist, the savings in the factory or mine were biotic, relationship of the white masses to their rulers.<br />

still considerable.For example, in the 1830's almost onethird<br />

of the workers at the U.S. Navy shipyard at Norfolk<br />

The slave system had committed the fatal sin of<br />

were Afrikans, rented at only two-thirds the cost of white restricting the white population, while massing great<br />

wage-labor.(l5)<br />

numbers of Afrikans. In the 1860 Census we can see the<br />

disparity of the settler populations of North and South.<br />

But the Amerikan capitalists needed to greatly ex- Excluding the border States of Delaware and Maryland,<br />

pand their labor force. While the planters believed that im- the slave States had a median population density of a bare<br />

porting ney millions of Afrikan slaves would most pro- 18 whites per sq. mile. The most heavily populated slave<br />

fitably meet this need, it was clear that this would only add State-Kentucky-had a population of only 31 whites per<br />

fuel to the fires of the already insurrectionary Afrikan col- sq.mile. In sharp contrast, Northern States such as Ohio,<br />

ony. Profit had to be seen not in the squeezing of a few New Jersey, and Massachusetts had populations of 59, 81,<br />

more dollars on a short-term, individual basis, but in terms and 158 whites per sq. mile respectively.(l6) This disparity<br />

of the needs of an entire Empire and its future. And it was was not only large, but was qualitatively significant for the<br />

not just the demand for labor alone that outmoded the future of the Euro-Amerikan Empire.<br />

slave system.<br />

It is no surprise that the planter bourgeoisie view-<br />

Capitalism needed giant armies of settlers, waves ed society far differently than did the New York banker or<br />

and waves of new European shock-troops to help cofiquer Massachusetts mill owner. The thought of an Amerika<br />

and hold new territory, to develop it for the bourgeoisie, crowded with millions and millions of poverty-stricken<br />

and garrison it against the oppressed. The Mississippi European laborers, all sharing citizenship with their<br />

Valley, the Plains, the Northern territories of Mexico, the mansion-dwelling brothers, horrified the planter elite.<br />

Pacific West-a whole continent of land and resources 22 They viewed themselves as the founders of a future

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!