28.01.2014 Views

Settlers - San Francisco Bay Area Independent Media Center

Settlers - San Francisco Bay Area Independent Media Center

Settlers - San Francisco Bay Area Independent Media Center

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

IV. SETTLER TRADE-<br />

UNIONISM<br />

1. The Rise of White Labor<br />

Settler Amerika got the reinforcements it needed<br />

to advance into Empire from the great European immigration<br />

of the 19th Century. Between 1830-1860 some 4.5<br />

Million Europeans (two-thirds of them Irish and German)<br />

arrived to help the settler beachhead on the Eastern shore<br />

push outward.(l) The impact of these reinforcements on<br />

the tide of battle can be guessed from the fact that they<br />

numbered more than the total settler population of 1800.<br />

At a time when the young settler nation was dangerously<br />

dependent on the rebellious Afrikan colony in the South,<br />

and on the continental battleground greatly outnumbered<br />

by the various Indian, Mexican and Afrikan nations, these<br />

new legions of Europeans played a decisive role.<br />

The fact that this flood of new Europeans also<br />

helped create contradictions within the settler ranks has led<br />

to honest confusions. Some comrades mistakenly believe<br />

that a white proletariat was born, whose trade-union and<br />

socialist activities placed it in the historic position of a<br />

primary force for revolution (and thus our eventual ally).<br />

The key is to see what was dominant in the material life<br />

and political consciousness of this new labor stratum, then<br />

and now.<br />

The earlier settler society of the English colonies<br />

was relatively "fluid" and still unformed in terms of class<br />

structure. After all, the original ruling class of Amerika<br />

was back in England, and even the large Virginia planter<br />

capitalists were seen by the English aristocracy as mere<br />

middle-men between them and the Afrikan proletarians<br />

who actually created the wealth. To them George<br />

Washington was just an overpaid foreman. And while<br />

there were great differences in wealth and power, there was<br />

a shared privilege among settlers. Few were exploited in the<br />

scientific socialist sense of being a wage-slave of capital; in<br />

fact, wage labor for another man was looked down upon<br />

by whites as a mark of failure (and still is by many). Up until<br />

the mid-1800's settler society then was characterized by<br />

the unequal but general opportunities for land ownership<br />

and the extraordinary fluidity of personal fortunes by Old<br />

European standards.<br />

This era of early settlerism rapidly drew to a close<br />

as Amerikan capitalism matured. Good Indian land and<br />

cheap Afrikan slaves became more and more difficult for<br />

ordinary settlers to obtain. In the South the ranks of the<br />

planters began tightening, concentrating as capital itself<br />

was. One historian writes:<br />

slaveowners as so many succeeded in doing ... But the day<br />

of the farmer began to wane rapidly after 1850. If he had<br />

not already obtained good land, it became doubtful he<br />

could ever improve his fortunes. All the fertile soil that was<br />

not under cultivation was generally held by speculators at<br />

mounting prices. "(2)<br />

While in the cities of the North, the small, local<br />

business of the independent master craftsman (shoemaker,<br />

blacksmith, cooper, etc.) was giving way step by step to the<br />

large merchant, with his regional business and his capitalist<br />

workshop/factory. This was the inevitable casualty list of<br />

industrialism. At the beginning of the 1800's it was still<br />

true that every ambitious, young Euro-Amerikan apprentice<br />

worker could expect to eventually become a master,<br />

owning his own little business (and often his own slaves).<br />

There is no exaggeration in saying this. We know, for example,<br />

that in the Philadelphia of the 1820's craft masters<br />

actually outnumbered their jn~lrneymen employees by 3 to<br />

2-and that various tradesmen, masters and professionals<br />

were an absolute majority of the Euro-Amerikan male<br />

population. (3)<br />

But by 1860 the number of journeymen workers<br />

compared to masters had tripled, and a majority of Euro-<br />

Amerikan men were now wage-earners.(4) Working for a<br />

master or merchant was no longer just a temporary<br />

stepping-stone to becoming an independent landowner or<br />

shopkeeper. This new white workforce for the first time<br />

had little prospect of advancing beyond wage-slavery.<br />

Unemployment and wage-slashing were common<br />

phenomena, and an increasing class strife and discontent<br />

entered the world of the settlers.<br />

In this scene the new millions of immigrant European<br />

workers, many with Old European experiences of<br />

class struggle, furnished the final element in the hardening<br />

of a settler class structure. The political development was<br />

very rapid once the nodal point was reached: From artisan<br />

guilds to craft associations to local unions. National<br />

unions and labor journals soon appeared. And in the<br />

workers' movements the championing of various socialist<br />

and even Marxist ideas was widespread and popular, particularly<br />

since these immigrant masses were salted with<br />

radical political exiles (Marx, in the Inaugural Address to<br />

the 1st International in 1864, says: "...crushed by the iron<br />

hand of force, the most advanced sons of labor fled in<br />

despair to the transatlantic Republic.. .")<br />

"During the earlier decades, when the lower South All this was but the outward form of proletarian<br />

was being settled, farmers stood every chance of becoming class consciousness, made all the more convincing because<br />

planters. Until late in the fifties (1850's-ed.) most those white workers subjectively believed that they were<br />

planters or their fathers before them started life as proletarians-"the exploited", "the creators of<br />

yeomen, occasionally with a few slaves, but generally all wealth", "the sons of toil", etc. etc. In actuality this<br />

without any hands except their own. The heyday of these was clearly untrue. While there were many exploited and<br />

poor people lasted as long as land and slaves Gere cheap, poverty-stricken immigrant proletarians, these new Euroenabling<br />

them to realize their ambition to be planters and 24 Arnerikan workers as a whole were a privileged labor

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!