09.02.2014 Views

A Toy Model of Chemical Reaction Networks - TBI - Universität Wien

A Toy Model of Chemical Reaction Networks - TBI - Universität Wien

A Toy Model of Chemical Reaction Networks - TBI - Universität Wien

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 7<br />

Conclusion and Outlook<br />

The present <strong>Toy</strong> <strong>Model</strong> is at least close to a minimal implementation <strong>of</strong><br />

an artificial chemistry exhibiting what we consider the defining features <strong>of</strong><br />

“real” chemistry. Molecules were represented only by their connectivity information<br />

and atom types, as labeled graphs, and their energy was defined<br />

along the lines <strong>of</strong> quantum chemistry, using an extremely simplified function.<br />

This energy model forms the basis <strong>of</strong> full-fledged chemical thermodynamics<br />

and kinetics. <strong>Chemical</strong> reactions are implemented as graph rewriting rules<br />

that have to obey the principle <strong>of</strong> conservation <strong>of</strong> matter. These features<br />

distinguish the <strong>Toy</strong> <strong>Model</strong> from artificial chemistries that are defined on abstract<br />

algebraic structures such as the λ calculus, Turing machines, or term<br />

rewriting. The application <strong>of</strong> the model to examples <strong>of</strong> complex organic and<br />

prebiotic chemistry allowed an quasi-ab initio simulation <strong>of</strong> the resulting<br />

networks and prediction <strong>of</strong> their properties. Now the emergence <strong>of</strong> generic<br />

properties <strong>of</strong> CRNs can be studied given only starting material, generic reactions<br />

and atom and bond parameters. A true ab initio simulation would not<br />

need the introduction the latter parameters for the energy calculation and<br />

would simulate reactions without even specifying generic reactions. Yet both<br />

“educated guesses” are founded on the results <strong>of</strong> quantum chemistry and<br />

synthetic chemistry, and their validity could be estimated by the judicious<br />

comparison <strong>of</strong> predicted to experimental results.<br />

A number <strong>of</strong> extensions <strong>of</strong> the present <strong>Toy</strong> <strong>Model</strong> are desirable. For<br />

instance, the addition <strong>of</strong> the corresponding parameters (see appendix A)<br />

would extend the current implementation <strong>of</strong> the model, considering only<br />

molecules composed <strong>of</strong> C, H, O, and N, to an expanded set <strong>of</strong> chemical<br />

elements, most importantly S, P, Si, and the halogens. The inclusion <strong>of</strong><br />

charged particles and radicals also does not seem to pose problems in the<br />

current framework. Charges situated on specific atoms can be indicated in<br />

SMILES, e.g. HC([O−]) = O. In fact, it does not matter to which atom the<br />

55

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!