invit - Australasian Plant Pathology Society
invit - Australasian Plant Pathology Society
invit - Australasian Plant Pathology Society
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Go to<br />
Table of Contents<br />
APPLICATION OF VARIOUS INOCULATION METHODS TO EVALUATE<br />
SUNFLOWER VARIETIES TO SCLEROTINIA SCLEROTIORUM UNDER FIELD<br />
CONDITIONS<br />
R. Ebrahimi A , S. Rahmanpour B , Y. Goosta C , S. Rezaee A<br />
A<br />
Department of <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Pathology</strong>, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad<br />
University, Tehran, Iran. Email: ebrahimirouya@gmail.com<br />
B<br />
Seed and <strong>Plant</strong> Improvement Research Institute (S.P.I.I.), Mahdasht Road, Karaj, Iran.<br />
C<br />
Department of <strong>Plant</strong> Protection, College of Agriculture, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran.<br />
ABSTRACT. It is necessary to develop cultivars with adequate genetic resistance for reduction of yield losses caused by<br />
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (Lib.) de Bary. The purpose of this study was to find an effective method of inoculation with S.<br />
sclerotiorum fungus in order to screening and identifying of susceptible and resistant sunflower cultivars under field<br />
evaluations. Three stem inoculation techniques including: 1- mycelium plug, 2- oxalic acid solution and 3 - wheat seeds<br />
infested with Sclerotinia mycelium were employed. Four genotypes including Ghalami (local variety in market), Confeta,<br />
Allstar, and Master were used in this study. Lesion lengths, lesion width, lesion as up and down leading on the stem from<br />
inoculation site were measured after 3, 7, 10, and 14 days of inoculation. The experimental design used was completely<br />
randomized with three replications. The evaluation was repeated three times separately. The analysis of variance showed<br />
significant difference between all employed techniques and incubation days after inoculation. Reaction of cultivars and<br />
employed inoculation techniques were significantly different moreover, mycelial plug demonstrated maximal lesion length<br />
values.<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
S. sclerotiorum is the soil born pathogen that causes the<br />
disease, resulting wilt, stem rot, or head rot of sunflower.<br />
The fungus has high pathogenicity and attack to more<br />
than 480 plant species (1). This pathogen causes most<br />
economic damages on sunflower worldwide, and has<br />
been subject on disease control in several decades (2).<br />
The chemical control is difficult, expensive, and harmful<br />
for environment. Thus, it is required to develop cultivars<br />
with adequate genetic resistance for yield losses.<br />
Researchers have employed methods to evaluate crops<br />
against the disease under field conditions (3).<br />
Importantly, field screening for disease resistance is still<br />
critical for the development of resistant cultivars (1). The<br />
objective of this study was to find an effective method to<br />
inoculate sunflowers with S. sclerotiorum for screening<br />
and distinguishing resistant and susceptible genotypes.<br />
MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />
The Sclerotinia isolate used in this study was collected as<br />
a single sclerot from North-West Iran. The sunflower<br />
cultivars including Ghalami (local variety in market), and<br />
Confeta, and Alestar and Master were used as<br />
confectionary and oilseed varieties, respectively. Three<br />
stem inoculation techniques: 1- mycelial plug (MP), 2-<br />
oxalic acid solution (OAS) and 3- infested wheat seeds<br />
(IWS), were employed. These methods were used to<br />
compare for resistance evaluation under field conditions.<br />
The treatments were wounded and non-wounded to find<br />
out the effect of wounding on disease progress. Three<br />
days after inoculation, Parafilm of the treated stems was<br />
removed. The lesion lengths were measured after 3, 7, 10,<br />
and 14 days incubation.<br />
RESULTS<br />
Analysis of variance showed significant differences<br />
between the inoculation methods and reaction of<br />
cultivars. Data comparison showed that the MP method is<br />
significantly different from the others and demonstrated<br />
the best infection (lesion length) on sunflower stems<br />
(figure. 1). Furthermore, wounded treatments resulted in<br />
faster progress of the disease in this technique comparing<br />
to others. The largest lesion length on the Alestar cultivar<br />
was established by the MP inoculation technique<br />
meanwhile, Master did not show the disease symptoms<br />
among the genotypes.<br />
lession length (mm)<br />
25<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0<br />
MP OAS IWS Control<br />
inoculation method<br />
Figure 1. Effect of inoculation methods on lesion length<br />
caused by S. sclerotiorum (MP mycelial plug; OAS<br />
oxalic acid solution; IWS infected wheat seeds).<br />
DISCUSSION<br />
The results we obtained show that MP method for<br />
inoculation has significantly reliable effect on sunflower<br />
genotypes. Interestingly, at last date of measurements, the<br />
susceptible plants demonstrated stem wilt which was not<br />
observed on other used methods. Additionally, hybrid<br />
variety Master as a resistant resource can be used for<br />
sunflower breeding programs.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
1. Motallebi, M., Afshari Azad, H. and Zamani, M.R.<br />
(2008). Polygalacturonase production by Sclerotinia<br />
sclerotiorum, Causal Agent of Canola Stem Rot:<br />
Parameter Optimization Using Taguchi Approach.<br />
World Applied Sciences Journal. 3 (1): 96-101.<br />
2. Gulya, T. (2003). An Inoculation Method for Sclerotinia<br />
Stalk Rot. USDA-ARS Northern Crop Science<br />
Laboratory. Fargo, ND 58102 U.S.A.<br />
3. Bradley, C.A., Henson, R.A., Porter, P.M., LeGare,<br />
D.G., Del Rio, L.E. and Khot, S.D. (2006). Response of<br />
canola cultivars to Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in controlled<br />
and field environments. <strong>Plant</strong> Disease 90: 215-219.<br />
7th <strong>Australasian</strong> Soilborne Diseases Symposium 51