Carbon 2009 Emission trading coming home - UNEP Finance Initiative
Carbon 2009 Emission trading coming home - UNEP Finance Initiative
Carbon 2009 Emission trading coming home - UNEP Finance Initiative
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
17 March <strong>2009</strong><br />
Figure 3.5: Should I buy, sell, bank or reduce emissions?<br />
Companies with emissions covered by the EU ETS. N=285 (<strong>2009</strong>).<br />
40%<br />
35%<br />
30%<br />
25%<br />
20%<br />
I/we would buy EUAs today at a minimum price of<br />
2008<br />
<strong>2009</strong><br />
Average 2008: €18<br />
Average <strong>2009</strong>: €11<br />
35%<br />
30%<br />
25%<br />
20%<br />
I/we would sell EUAs today at a minimum price of €<br />
2008<br />
<strong>2009</strong><br />
Average 2008: €28<br />
Average <strong>2009</strong>: €17<br />
15%<br />
15%<br />
10%<br />
10%<br />
5%<br />
5%<br />
0%<br />
0%<br />
0-10<br />
10-15<br />
15-20<br />
20-25<br />
25-30<br />
30-35<br />
35-50<br />
50-<br />
100<br />
>100<br />
0-10<br />
10-15<br />
15-20<br />
20-25<br />
25-30<br />
30-35<br />
35-50<br />
50-100<br />
>100<br />
25%<br />
20%<br />
15%<br />
I/we would bank any surplus EUAs at prices below €<br />
2008<br />
<strong>2009</strong><br />
Average 2008: €22<br />
Average <strong>2009</strong>: €15<br />
25%<br />
20%<br />
15%<br />
We would seek to reduce our own emissions and start to<br />
sell EUAs if the EUA price were to stay above €<br />
2008<br />
<strong>2009</strong><br />
Average 2008: €44<br />
10%<br />
10%<br />
Average <strong>2009</strong>: €33<br />
5%<br />
5%<br />
0%<br />
0%<br />
0-10<br />
10-15<br />
15-20<br />
20-25<br />
25-30<br />
30-35<br />
35-50<br />
50-100<br />
>100<br />
0-10<br />
10-15<br />
15-20<br />
20-25<br />
25-30<br />
30-35<br />
35-50<br />
50-100<br />
>100<br />
Source: Point <strong>Carbon</strong><br />
the EU ETS in phase 2 significantly<br />
down. Some analysts, such<br />
as Deutsche Bank and Daiwa<br />
Securities, have even forecast a<br />
surplus of EUAs over the 2008-<br />
12 period. Point <strong>Carbon</strong> and most<br />
other analysts, however, still<br />
expect the phase as a whole to<br />
be short EUAs, and thus to need<br />
a certain volume of CER/ERU<br />
imports to be in compliance.<br />
The reduction in expected<br />
emissions at the company level<br />
can be seen in Figure 3.3. This<br />
figure shows the distribution of<br />
reported short and long positions<br />
in the ETS. Most notably, the<br />
share of companies reporting that<br />
they need to buy EUAs in addition<br />
to their full credit limit has fallen<br />
from 37 percent last year to 31<br />
percent this year. In the same<br />
manner, the share of companies<br />
with surplus EUAs to sell has<br />
gone up from 15 percent to 24<br />
percent. This situation agrees<br />
with the brisk selling of EUAs<br />
that we have seen in recent<br />
months.<br />
Increased share<br />
of companies with<br />
surplus allowances<br />
How are these “shorts” and<br />
“longs” distributed by sector?<br />
Figure 3.4 gives some answers.<br />
The companies that have surplus<br />
EUAs to sell are concentrated<br />
in the industry sectors other<br />
than oil and gas. Companies<br />
in the sectors pulp and paper<br />
(67 percent), cement, lime and<br />
glass (36 percent) and others (38<br />
percent) will likely have surplus<br />
EUAs to sell. Some of this surplus<br />
likely derives from a contraction<br />
in production output in these<br />
sectors.<br />
Also as expected, the power<br />
sector has the greatest number of<br />
short companies, with 53 percent<br />
needing to buy extra EUAs<br />
(whether or not they have surplus<br />
CERs). This is also the sector that<br />
has the brunt of CERs available<br />
for swapping, presumably in large<br />
21<br />
All rights reserved © <strong>2009</strong> Point <strong>Carbon</strong>