14.02.2014 Views

Carbon 2009 Emission trading coming home - UNEP Finance Initiative

Carbon 2009 Emission trading coming home - UNEP Finance Initiative

Carbon 2009 Emission trading coming home - UNEP Finance Initiative

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Carbon</strong> <strong>2009</strong><br />

part from projects in which power<br />

companies are investors.<br />

As is well known, the economic<br />

downturn has had a negative<br />

effect on carbon prices, with<br />

the EUA Dec-09 contract having<br />

declined from around €30 last<br />

summer to around €12 at the<br />

time of writing. The lower prices<br />

fundamentally show that the<br />

slowdown has made it easier<br />

for Europe to meet its Kyoto<br />

commitments, and also reflect<br />

steep declines in oil and other<br />

energy commodities.<br />

In the same way as last year,<br />

our survey asked respondents<br />

involved in the EU ETS at what<br />

maximum or minimum prices<br />

they would buy, sell, bank EUAs<br />

or reduce their own emissions. As<br />

may be expected, prices indicated<br />

are much lower across the board.<br />

When asked about the maximum<br />

price for buying EUAs, the most<br />

frequently selected range was<br />

€10-15, compared to €20-25 last<br />

year. The same configuration was<br />

seen for the minimum EUA sale<br />

price (see Figure 3.5).<br />

Respondents willing<br />

to buy/sell at<br />

lower prices<br />

When asked at which point<br />

companies would bank surplus<br />

EUAs rather than selling them<br />

in the market, one-fifth of<br />

respondents said the price at<br />

which they would no longer sell<br />

was between €0 and 10. Last<br />

year, only one in ten chose this<br />

range.<br />

Finally, the most frequently<br />

cited price at which companies<br />

would start reducing their own<br />

Share of respondents<br />

Figure 3.6: Willingness to buy/sell EUAs at various prices<br />

Companies with emissions covered by the EU ETS. N=285 (<strong>2009</strong>).<br />

100%<br />

80%<br />

60%<br />

40%<br />

20%<br />

0%<br />

Source: Point <strong>Carbon</strong><br />

emissions and sell EUAs moved<br />

down from €35-50 to €25-30.<br />

While predictable, the movement<br />

on these two latter questions<br />

clearly indicates that price<br />

expectations have been scaled<br />

Figure 3.7: Lowering spread expectations<br />

Companies involved in <strong>trading</strong>. The alternative with sCER prices above the<br />

EUA was not offered in 2008. N=972.<br />

Issued CERs > EUAs<br />

€ 10 or more<br />

€ 8-10<br />

€ 6-8<br />

€ 4-6<br />

€ 2-4<br />

€ 0-2<br />

Don't know/no opinion<br />

Source: Point <strong>Carbon</strong><br />

down. In principle, banking and<br />

abatement should be guided by<br />

long-term abatement costs and<br />

carbon prices, but the economic<br />

downturn has apparently shifted<br />

these costs downwards as well.<br />

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35%<br />

Share of respondents<br />

would buy at max<br />

<strong>2009</strong><br />

would sell at min<br />

<strong>2009</strong><br />

would buy at max<br />

2008<br />

would sell at min<br />

2008<br />

0-10 10-15 15-20 20-25 25-30 30-35 35-50 50-100 above<br />

100<br />

<strong>2009</strong><br />

2008<br />

22<br />

All rights reserved © <strong>2009</strong> Point <strong>Carbon</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!