19.02.2014 Views

Uniform Bank Performance Report - Anderson School of Management

Uniform Bank Performance Report - Anderson School of Management

Uniform Bank Performance Report - Anderson School of Management

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

price <strong>of</strong> the company could increase. This could result in larger capital reserve requirements, higher<br />

interest rates, and many other factors that could negatively affect the company’s pr<strong>of</strong>its.<br />

Income statement analysis <strong>of</strong> JPMC reveals that Interest revenue from loans in 2009 has been slow, yet<br />

still above that <strong>of</strong> its competitors. Service charge revenue has been high, bringing in $3.5 billion in<br />

revenue in the first half <strong>of</strong> 2009 alone. Card services are also successful and should prove to be an even<br />

bigger source <strong>of</strong> revenue as the economy continues to grow. Interest expense was low in 2009<br />

compared to prior years, while non‐interest expense has been increasing. However, the non‐interest<br />

expense statistic has been skewed by the acquisition <strong>of</strong> Bear and WaMu. Overall analysis <strong>of</strong> the income<br />

statement yields positive results.<br />

Balance sheet analysis shows an abundance <strong>of</strong> toxic assets held by JPMC. These have caused the bank to<br />

raise their provisions for credit losses account to over $16.6 billion, meaning that the bank anticipates<br />

the continued growth <strong>of</strong> these losses. Loans made by JPMC have decreased as a result <strong>of</strong> tightened<br />

credit markets and widespread declines in the economy. This will inhibit its future growth prospects. In<br />

addition, JPMC’s investment and underwriting activities have suffered substantially. Debt and equity<br />

investments held for clients decreased by 14%, while derivative investments decreased by 40% in the<br />

most recent year. These drastic decreases reflect consumers’ loss in confidence in JPMC and the<br />

financial markets in general. However, as the economy continues to recover, these numbers may<br />

recover quickly as well.<br />

JPMC’s ROA has been steadily declining, but is on par with competitors, and appears worse than it really<br />

is due to the huge acquisition <strong>of</strong> assets from Bear Stearns and WaMu. ROE has also been in a steady<br />

decline, but is similar to that <strong>of</strong> competing banks. The NIM for JPMC is a promising statistic. Not only has<br />

it been steady and on par with competition, but has shown an increase in 2009 which shows JPMC’s<br />

ability to manage interest rate risks during volatile times.<br />

Asset quality figures do not look good, but are similar to what can be expected by a bank heavily<br />

affected by the mortgage and asset backed securities crisis. The value <strong>of</strong> JPMC’s credit portfolio is $1.92<br />

trillion, with non‐performing / past‐due receivables at $17.5 billion. However, this should not pose a<br />

deadly threat to the bank as it is still well capitalized. Capital ratios, including Tier 1, Tier 2, and Total

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!