1815 - 1817 Scroll Book - Nine Incorporated Trades of Dundee
1815 - 1817 Scroll Book - Nine Incorporated Trades of Dundee
1815 - 1817 Scroll Book - Nine Incorporated Trades of Dundee
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
hand down to his successors in <strong>of</strong>fice the power <strong>of</strong> Magistrates as he found them. – he<br />
considered that the Magistrates would not be justified in acceding to the change proposed by<br />
the Guildry, as in his mind the Convention <strong>of</strong> Burghs before whom it was proposed to bring<br />
the Matter had no power to sanction such change, that such a change would be legally<br />
brought about by application to Parliament or the privie Council only. – At the same time he<br />
was but one <strong>of</strong> the Magistracy, but that he would assemble the Toun Council and let them<br />
judge for themselves, he himself being determined to remain neutral at the discussion.<br />
Mr Baxter than asked him when he would call a Council to which he replied that he did not<br />
know when it might suit the Gentlemen to meet in council as they were very busy about their<br />
own affairs. The Mediators then mentioned their regret that the negotiation had taken so<br />
unpromising a turn, and that tho’ the considered Provost Riddoch’s answer as <strong>of</strong>ficial they<br />
would still recommend to Mr Roberts as Preses <strong>of</strong> the Sub committee to write a note to Mr<br />
Anderson that if no meeting <strong>of</strong> the Council took place by Monday the 25 Inst that Mr Roberts<br />
was to consider the negotiation at an end which Mr Roberts complied with in the following<br />
note No 3.<br />
Thursday: This morning Mr Miln called on Mr Roberts and stated that he had heard the<br />
Action for the funds had been called on the 12 th Inst notwithstanding the assurances the Sub<br />
Committee had given Mr Anderson in their note to him <strong>of</strong> the same date that it would not -<br />
Mr Roberts waited on Mr Saunders to know if that was the case, but Mr Saunders had<br />
received no advice: however on enquiring it was found to be so, and Mr Roberts considering<br />
that he was bound to give Mr Anderson a clear explanation how it had arisen in order to<br />
free the Sub Committee from blame Mr Saunders gave him in about an hour after, the<br />
statement contained in the Letter to him – No 4.<br />
On Mr Roberts leaving Mr Saunders he heard that a Toun Council has been summoned to<br />
meet in about half an hour and fearing he might not receive Mr Saunders written<br />
explanation he called on Mr Anderson and accounted to him how the mistake <strong>of</strong> calling the<br />
action had occurred and Mr Anderson very handsomely declared he had not suspected the<br />
Sub committee <strong>of</strong> being privy, and that he would state the whole explanation I had given<br />
him to the Toun Council..<br />
In about an hour afterwards Mr Anderson wrote Mr Roberts the Note No 5.<br />
Mr Roberts having heard that Provost Riddoch had dilated a good deal in the Council<br />
regarding the action being called in face <strong>of</strong> a written pledge that it should not be so by the<br />
Sub Committee Mr Roberts immediately waited on Mr Anderson and showed him the<br />
written explanation which he having read, Mr Roberts then said, Mr Anderson will you<br />
allow me to put two questions to you.<br />
1 st Will you candidly tell me if to your opinion that the Mistake <strong>of</strong> calling the action for the<br />
funds had any influence in bringing the Magistrates to the resolution which you have just<br />
communicated to me. – Mr Anderson after a little hesitation said it was his opinion it has<br />
had no influence on the Magistrates.<br />
2dly. Mr Roberts then put his second question. As you note Mr Anderson in its concluding<br />
sentence seems to separate the funds from the general claims <strong>of</strong> the Guidry do you think if<br />
we can satisfy the Magistrates that the action has been called by mistake, they would<br />
negotiate with us on that point? Mr Anderson said he really believed the door was shut<br />
against all farther negotiation.<br />
Copy Letter referred to in the foregoing Notes:<br />
No 1.<br />
Dear Sir, I am sorry that I have not yet any communication to make from the Magistrates. It<br />
however occurs to me that tomorrow is the day when the action about the funds ought to be<br />
called, and I think you hinted the other day that it would not be proceeded in at present in<br />
hope that the Magistrates would accede to your wishes. Now I should be apprehensive that if<br />
the Magistrates should not comply with you request it might be said that they only wished<br />
delay in order to get the business another reason put <strong>of</strong>f. I therefore hope you will excuse me<br />
for giving you this hint, that you may take such steps as you may think proper, so that I may<br />
be kept clear <strong>of</strong> blame in thus business &c.<br />
11 November 1816 Signed Patk Anderson.<br />
21