Topology, symmetry, and phase transitions in lattice gauge ... - tuprints

More documents

Recommendations

Info

144 bibliography [74] P. Ginsparg, Applied Conformal Field Theory, ArXiv High Energy Physics - Theory e-prints (1991). arXiv:arXiv:hep-th/9108028. (Cited on page 40.) [75] N. Seiberg, E. Witten, Electric - magnetic duality, monopole condensation, and confinement in N=2 supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory, Nucl. Phys. B426 (1994) 19–52. arXiv:hep-th/9407087. (Cited on page 40.) [76] P. Ruelle, Kramers-Wannier Dualities via Symmetries, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (22) (2005) 225701. arXiv:arXiv:cond-mat/0504758. (Cited on page 41.) [77] C. Schweigert, E. Tsouchnika, Kramers-Wannier dualities for WZW theories and minimal models, Communications in Contemporary Mathematics 10 (05) (2008) 773–789. (Cited on page 41.) [78] L. Onsager, Crystal statistics. 1. A two-dimensional model with an order disorder transition, Phys. Rev. 65 (1944) 117–149. (Cited on page 42.) [79] R. Baxter, Exactly solved models in statistical mechanics, Academic Press, 1982. (Cited on pages 47 and 55.) [80] J. Christensen, G. Thorleifsson, P. H. Damgaard, J. F. Wheater, Thermodynamics of SU(3) lattice gauge theory in (2 + 1) dimensions, Nucl. Phys. (1992) 225–248. (Cited on page 52.) [81] L. G. Yaffe, Confinement in SU(N) lattice gauge theories, Phys. Rev. D21 (1980) 1574. (Cited on page 52.) [82] N. Cabibbo, E. Marinari, A New Method for Updating SU(N) Matrices in Computer Simulations of Gauge Theories, Phys. Lett. B119 (1982) 387–390. (Cited on page 52.) [83] C. Wozar, T. Kaestner, A. Wipf, T. Heinzl, B. Pozsgay, Phase structure of Z(3)-Polyakov-loop models, Phys. Rev. D74 (2006) 114501. arXiv:hep-lat/ 0605012. (Cited on pages 55 and 62.) [84] B. Lucini, M. Teper, Confining strings in SU(N) gauge theories, Phys. Rev. D64 (2001) 105019. arXiv:hep-lat/0107007. (Cited on page 63.) [85] M. Teper, Large N and confining flux tubes as strings - a view from the lattice, Acta Phys. Polon. B40 (2009) 3249–3320. arXiv:0912.3339. (Cited on page 63.) [86] A. Athenodorou, B. Bringoltz, M. Teper, Closed flux tubes and their string description in D=2+1 SU(N) gauge theories, JHEP 1105 (2011) 042. arXiv: 1103.5854. (Cited on page 63.) [87] M. Caselle, P. Grinza, On the intrinsic width of the chromoelectric flux tube in finite temperature LGTs, JHEP 1211 (2012) 174. arXiv:1207.6523. (Cited on page 63.) [88] F. Gliozzi, M. Pepe, U.-J. Wiese, Linear Broadening of the Confining String in Yang-Mills Theory at Low Temperature, JHEP 1101 (2011) 057. arXiv: 1010.1373. (Cited on page 63.)
ibliography 145 [89] A. S. Kronfeld, U. J. Wiese, SU(N) gauge theories with C periodic boundary conditions. 1. Topological structure, Nucl. Phys. B357 (1991) 521–533. (Cited on pages 63, 71, 72, 73, 74, and 129.) [90] U.-J. Wiese, C- and G-periodic QCD at finite temperature, Nucl. Phys. (1992) 45–66. (Cited on page 63.) [91] K. A. Milton, G. R. Kalbfleisch, W. Luo, L. Gamberg, Theoretical and experimental status of magnetic monopoles, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A17 (2002) 732–750. arXiv:hep-ph/0111062. (Cited on page 65.) [92] C. Montonen, D. Olive, Magnetic monopoles as gauge particles?, Phys. Lett. (1977) 117–120. (Cited on page 65.) [93] P. A. M. Dirac, Quantised singularities in the electromagnetic field, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A133 (1931) 60–72. (Cited on pages 65 and 91.) [94] R. F. Dashen, B. Hasslacher, A. Neveu, Nonperturbative methods and extended hadron models in field theory. 2. two-dimensional models and extended hadrons, Phys. Rev. D10 (1974) 4130–4138. (Cited on page 65.) [95] A. I. Veselov, M. I. Polikarpov, M. N. Chernodub, Monopole order parameter in SU(2) lattice gauge theory, J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 63 (1996) 411–416. (Cited on page 65.) [96] L. Del Debbio, A. Di Giacomo, G. Paffuti, Detecting dual superconductivity in the ground state of gauge theory, Phys. Lett. B349 (1995) 513–518. arXiv: hep-lat/9403013. (Cited on page 65.) [97] J. Frohlich, P. A. Marchetti, Gauge-invariant charged, monopole and dyon fields in gauge theories, Nucl. Phys. B551 (1999) 770–812. arXiv:hep-th/ 9812004. (Cited on page 65.) [98] J. Smit, A. van der Sijs, Monopoles and confinement, Nucl. Phys. B355 (1991) 603–648. (Cited on page 65.) [99] J. Smit, A. J. van der Sijs, A Magnetic monopole in pure SU(2) gauge theory, Nucl. Phys. B422 (1994) 349–381. arXiv:hep-lat/9312087. (Cited on page 65.) [100] A. C. Davis, T. W. B. Kibble, A. Rajantie, H. Shanahan, Topological defects in lattice gauge theories, JHEP 11 (2000) 010. arXiv:hep-lat/0009037. (Cited on pages 65, 71, and 82.) [101] A. C. Davis, A. Hart, T. W. B. Kibble, A. Rajantie, The monopole mass in the three-dimensional georgi-glashow model, Phys. Rev. D65 (2002) 125008. arXiv:hep-lat/0110154. (Cited on pages 65 and 71.) [102] A. Rajantie, Mass of a quantum ’t Hooft-Polyakov monopole, JHEP 01 (2006) 088. arXiv:hep-lat/0512006. (Cited on pages 65 and 71.) [103] G. ’t Hooft, Magnetic monopoles in unified gauge theories, Nucl. Phys. B79 (1974) 276–284. (Cited on page 66.)
Page 1 and 2:
T O P O L O G Y, S Y M M E T RY, A
Page 3:
To Angela.
Page 6 and 7:
Z U S A M M E N FA S S U N G Wir un
Page 8 and 9:
viii contents 4.6 Algebraic formula
Page 10 and 11:
2 introduction While waiting on exp
Page 13 and 14:
G A U G E T H E O R I E S 2 Before
Page 15 and 16:
2.2 quantization 7 The non-abelian
Page 17 and 18:
2.3 lattice field theory 9 Figure 2
Page 19 and 20:
2.3 lattice field theory 11 the pro
Page 21:
2.3 lattice field theory 13 picked
Page 24 and 25:
16 universal aspects of confinement
Page 26 and 27:
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31:
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34 and 35:
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 73 and 74:
’ T H O O F T M O N O P O L E S I
Page 75 and 76:
4.1 magnetic charges in the continu
Page 77 and 78:
4.2 magnetic charge on the lattice
Page 79 and 80:
4.4 twisted c-periodic boundary con
Page 81 and 82:
4.5 intuitive picture 73 Therefore
Page 83 and 84:
4.5 intuitive picture 75 The constr
Page 85 and 86:
4.5 intuitive picture 77 This illus
Page 87 and 88:
4.6 algebraic formulation 79 It fol
Page 89 and 90:
4.6 algebraic formulation 81 Figure
Page 91 and 92:
4.6 algebraic formulation 83 Applyi
Page 93:
4.7 the punchline 85 this restricti
Page 96 and 97:
88 fractional electric charge and q
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103: 94 fractional electric charge and q
Page 108 and 109: 100 fractional electric charge and
Page 127 and 128: C O N C L U D I N G R E M A R K S 6
Page 129 and 130: T W I S T AWAY F R O M C R I T I C
Page 131 and 132: twist away from criticality 123 0.1
Page 133 and 134: twist away from criticality 125 3.5
Page 135: twist away from criticality 127 2.2
Page 138 and 139: 130 more on c-periodic boundary con
Page 145 and 146: L O W- E N E R G Y R E P R E S E N
Page 147 and 148: B I B L I O G R A P H Y [1] S. Glas
Page 149 and 150: ibliography 141 [30] L. von Smekal,
Page 151: ibliography 143 [60] J. Engels, E.
Page 155 and 156: ibliography 147 [120] Y. Aoki, G. E
Page 157 and 158: ibliography 149 [151] M. P. Nightin
Page 159: ibliography 151 [179] C. Korthals A
Page 163: C U R R I C U L U M Name: Samuel Ry
show all

Topology, symmetry, and phase transitions in lattice gauge ... - tuprints

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?