28.02.2014 Views

Topology, symmetry, and phase transitions in lattice gauge ... - tuprints

Topology, symmetry, and phase transitions in lattice gauge ... - tuprints

Topology, symmetry, and phase transitions in lattice gauge ... - tuprints

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

72 ’t hooft monopoles <strong>in</strong> <strong>lattice</strong> guts<br />

Φ(x + Lĵ) = Ω † j (x)Φ∗ (x)Ω j (x),<br />

U µ (x + Lĵ) = Ω † j (x)U∗ µ(x)Ω j (x + ˆµ), (4.44)<br />

with SU(N) <strong>gauge</strong> transformations Ω j (x). We have started with the natural choice<br />

of complex conjugation <strong>in</strong> each spatial direction. We will call these C-periodic<br />

boundary conditions [89]. 2<br />

As for ’t Hooft’s twisted boundary conditions, successive applications <strong>in</strong> different<br />

directions should not depend on their order. This implies the equalities [89]<br />

<strong>and</strong><br />

Ω † j (x + Lˆk)Ω T k (x)Φ(x)Ω∗ k (x)Ω j(x + Lˆk)<br />

= Φ(x + Lĵ + Lˆk)<br />

= Ω † k (x + Lĵ)ΩT j (x)Φ(x)Ω∗ j (x)Ω k(x + Lĵ),<br />

Ω † j (x + Lˆk)Ω T k (x)U µ(x)Ω ∗ k (x + ˆµ)Ω j(x + Lˆk + ˆµ)<br />

= U µ (x + Lĵ + Lˆk)<br />

= Ω † k (x + Lĵ)ΩT j (x)U µ(x)Ω ∗ j (x + ˆµ)Ω k(x + Lĵ + ˆµ).<br />

(4.45)<br />

(4.46)<br />

S<strong>in</strong>ce both fields are bl<strong>in</strong>d to center elements, Eq. (4.45) implies the cocycle condition<br />

Ω ∗ i (x)Ω j(x + Lî) = z ij Ω ∗ j (x)Ω i(x + Lĵ),<br />

z ij = e <strong>in</strong> ij<br />

, (4.47)<br />

where the Nth roots of unity z ij = z ∗ ji<br />

formed by the antisymmetric ’twist tensor’<br />

n ij = −n ji have the usual parametrization <strong>in</strong> terms of three Z N -valued numbers m i ,<br />

n ij = 2π N ɛ ijkm k , m i ∈ Z N . (4.48)<br />

Furthermore, Eq. (4.46) implies that the z ij have to be <strong>in</strong>dependent of position.<br />

All choices of Ω i (x), Ω j (x) with the same twist z ij are <strong>gauge</strong> equivalent [47, 89],<br />

<strong>and</strong> we therefore assume that we can choose the matrices Ω j to be <strong>in</strong>dependent of<br />

position analogous to the st<strong>and</strong>ard ‘twist eaters’ <strong>in</strong> the case of ’t Hooft’s twisted<br />

boundary conditions without charge conjugation [106].<br />

Non-trivial twists are only possible for even N, which is revealed by apply<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the cocycle condition (4.47) to the product Ω i Ω ∗ j Ω k [89]. On the one h<strong>and</strong>,<br />

Ω i Ω ∗ j Ω k = z jk Ω i Ω ∗ k Ω j<br />

but apply<strong>in</strong>g the condition <strong>in</strong> the opposite order yields<br />

= z jk z ki Ω k Ωi ∗ Ω j<br />

= z jk z ki z ij Ω k Ω ∗ j Ω i, (4.49)<br />

Ω i Ω ∗ j Ω k = z ji Ω j Ω ∗ i Ω k<br />

= z ji z ik Ω j Ω ∗ k Ω i<br />

= z ji z ik z kj Ω k Ω ∗ j Ω i. (4.50)<br />

2 In fact, <strong>in</strong> the term<strong>in</strong>ology of Ref. [89], these correspond to C-periodic boundary conditions with<br />

C = −1, <strong>and</strong> C = 1 would correspond to boundary conditions without complex conjugation.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!