28.02.2014 Views

Topology, symmetry, and phase transitions in lattice gauge ... - tuprints

Topology, symmetry, and phase transitions in lattice gauge ... - tuprints

Topology, symmetry, and phase transitions in lattice gauge ... - tuprints

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

88 fractional electric charge <strong>and</strong> quark conf<strong>in</strong>ement<br />

unified theories, <strong>and</strong> the new topological possibilities. Prototypical unified theories<br />

provide <strong>in</strong>structive, motivat<strong>in</strong>g examples of how a topological l<strong>in</strong>k between the<br />

St<strong>and</strong>ard Model <strong>gauge</strong> groups may emerge <strong>in</strong> practice. Their details are not, however,<br />

essential to our <strong>in</strong>vestigation of whether the <strong>in</strong>clusion of fractional electric<br />

charge allows for the resurrection of a center <strong>symmetry</strong> break<strong>in</strong>g deconf<strong>in</strong>ement<br />

transition <strong>in</strong> the presence of dynamical quarks. For this, the vital assumption is<br />

that the St<strong>and</strong>ard Model <strong>gauge</strong> groups which are <strong>in</strong>herited from higher energy<br />

physics are compact, irrespective of their orig<strong>in</strong>. For a prelim<strong>in</strong>ary study, we implement<br />

2-color <strong>lattice</strong> models with fractional electric charge with respect to a compact<br />

U(1) <strong>gauge</strong> group as conceptual playgrounds.<br />

5.1 center <strong>symmetry</strong> break<strong>in</strong>g by quarks<br />

The explicit break<strong>in</strong>g of the center <strong>symmetry</strong> by quark fields <strong>in</strong> an SU(N) <strong>gauge</strong><br />

theory is best understood <strong>in</strong> analogy with the order<strong>in</strong>g of sp<strong>in</strong>s by an external<br />

magnetic field. Consider the <strong>lattice</strong> action for Wilson quarks <strong>in</strong> the fundamental<br />

representation of SU(N), Eq. (2.31). Integrat<strong>in</strong>g over the quark fields gives their<br />

contribution to the weight of a given <strong>gauge</strong> configuration <strong>in</strong> the partition function,<br />

∫<br />

∏ dψ(x)d ¯ψ(x) exp(−a 4 ∑<br />

x<br />

x,y<br />

¯ψ(x)(1 − κD(x|y))ψ(y)) = det(1 − κD), (5.1)<br />

where the hopp<strong>in</strong>g matrix D(x|y) conta<strong>in</strong>s the parallel transporters connect<strong>in</strong>g<br />

neighbor<strong>in</strong>g sites. This fermion determ<strong>in</strong>ant may be re-expressed as an effective<br />

action <strong>in</strong> terms of a power series. The formal result is [31],<br />

det(1 − κD) = exp(tr [ln(1 − κD)]) = exp(−<br />

which converges when the hopp<strong>in</strong>g parameter is small,<br />

κ =<br />

∞<br />

∑<br />

j=1<br />

1<br />

j κj tr[D j ]), (5.2)<br />

1<br />

2(am + 4) < 1 8 , (5.3)<br />

i.e., for large bare quark masses m.<br />

Each term <strong>in</strong> the exponential <strong>in</strong> Eq. (5.2) is the product of parallel transporters<br />

U µ along a closed quark loop. Large loops are exponentially suppressed <strong>in</strong> powers<br />

of the hopp<strong>in</strong>g parameter κ, which plays the role of the <strong>in</strong>verse quark mass <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>lattice</strong> units. The loops which close with<strong>in</strong> the <strong>lattice</strong> volume merely renormalize<br />

the <strong>lattice</strong> <strong>gauge</strong> coupl<strong>in</strong>g β. They are plaquettes <strong>and</strong> higher dimensional analogs<br />

that are likewise <strong>in</strong>variant under global center transformations that multiply every<br />

l<strong>in</strong>k <strong>in</strong> a timeslice by a Z N <strong>phase</strong> (cf. Eq. (3.8)).<br />

Loops that w<strong>in</strong>d around the <strong>lattice</strong> are another story. In the thermodynamic limit,<br />

L → ∞, the relevant loops are those wrapp<strong>in</strong>g around the compact temporal 1/T<br />

direction. The shortest possible w<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g gives a Polyakov loop correspond<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

a static quark worldl<strong>in</strong>e. S<strong>in</strong>ce loops <strong>in</strong> opposite temporal directions are treated<br />

equally, the hopp<strong>in</strong>g expansion <strong>in</strong> Eq. (5.2) contributes terms of the form,<br />

∝ −κ N t<br />

(P(⃗x) + P(⃗x) † ) = −2κ N t<br />

Re P(⃗x), (5.4)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!