28.02.2014 Views

A framework for joint management of regional water-energy ... - Orbit

A framework for joint management of regional water-energy ... - Orbit

A framework for joint management of regional water-energy ... - Orbit

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The constraints are mathematical expressions <strong>of</strong> the limitations that restrict<br />

the alternatives <strong>of</strong> the decision makers, such as minimum irrigation allocations,<br />

maximum power generation (installed capacity), minimum ecological<br />

flows or maximum hydropower releases. The power and the <strong>water</strong> balance<br />

are also described as constraints, using the estimated power demands and <strong>water</strong><br />

inflows.<br />

When solved, the optimization problem provides optimal values <strong>for</strong> each decision<br />

variable over the planning horizon. These values are optimal with respect<br />

to the chosen per<strong>for</strong>mance criterion, which in this case is net costs<br />

minimization.<br />

Hydropower reservoirs make the problem more computationally demanding<br />

because their storage couples successive time steps. It may be necessary to<br />

reduce the number <strong>of</strong> reservoirs sent to the optimization algorithm by using<br />

aggregation techniques. However, this is optional and depends on the number<br />

<strong>of</strong> reservoirs in the system and the ability <strong>of</strong> the algorithm to handle multiple<br />

reservoirs.<br />

The reservoir aggregation technique and the optimization algorithms used in<br />

this study are described in the following sections.<br />

4.1 Reservoir aggregation<br />

Because <strong>of</strong> curse <strong>of</strong> dimensionality mentioned above, it is not possible to use<br />

discrete DP methods to optimize more than three or four reservoirs simultaneously.<br />

There<strong>for</strong>e, the volumes and flows representing the hydrological system<br />

were converted to power and <strong>energy</strong> units, respectively, and aggregated<br />

into equivalent <strong>energy</strong> reservoirs.<br />

Two aggregation levels were applied depending on the optimization method.<br />

When using SDP, the seven major river basins <strong>of</strong> the IP were aggregated into<br />

one equivalent reservoir; when using SDDP, each river basin was aggregated<br />

into one equivalent reservoir, resulting in a system <strong>of</strong> seven reservoirs in parallel.<br />

Three conversion factors are used in the aggregation methodology (Table 7).<br />

The <strong>energy</strong> equivalent <strong>of</strong> catchment run<strong>of</strong>f is a conversion factor based on the<br />

hydropower equation that expresses the full hydropower potential <strong>of</strong> the run<strong>of</strong>f<br />

generated in the catchment. The other two factors deal with irrigation: the<br />

<strong>energy</strong> equivalent <strong>of</strong> catchment outflow indicates the amount <strong>of</strong> <strong>energy</strong> that is<br />

lost when <strong>water</strong> is allocated to upstream irrigation, and the average <strong>energy</strong><br />

22

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!