05.03.2014 Views

Hunter Water Corporation Operational Audit 2010/11 - IPART - NSW ...

Hunter Water Corporation Operational Audit 2010/11 - IPART - NSW ...

Hunter Water Corporation Operational Audit 2010/11 - IPART - NSW ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2 Overview of audit findings and recommendations<br />

Other grades of water (clause 3.7)<br />

Three clauses were audited with <strong>Hunter</strong> <strong>Water</strong> achieving high to full compliance<br />

grades. High compliance was awarded to the sub-clause (3.7.1) that requires <strong>Hunter</strong><br />

<strong>Water</strong> to supply other grades of water according to the Australian Guidelines for<br />

<strong>Water</strong> Recycling (AGWR) or relevant guidelines specified by <strong>NSW</strong> Health, DECC<br />

(now the Office of Environment and Heritage) and DWE (now <strong>NSW</strong> Office of <strong>Water</strong>).<br />

The auditor reviewed <strong>Hunter</strong> <strong>Water</strong>’s document ‘Recycled <strong>Water</strong> Quality<br />

Management Plan Current Recycled <strong>Water</strong> Schemes’. The auditor considered that<br />

the document was high level and did not include key information including agreed<br />

critical limits and monitoring programs to manage the quality of the recycled water,<br />

within the report. The auditor also found that there was insufficient detail on the<br />

timeframes to carry out the actions in the plan, and some milestones within the plan<br />

had not been met. For these reasons the auditor felt that a high compliance grade<br />

should be awarded.<br />

In response to the issues the auditor recommended that:<br />

<br />

<br />

For existing recycled water schemes <strong>Hunter</strong> <strong>Water</strong> should develop an agreed<br />

timeframe with <strong>NSW</strong> Health for the implementation of the core of the AGWR<br />

Framework, this should include validated critical limits and associated protocols<br />

for existing recycled water schemes.<br />

Develop an agreed timeframe with <strong>NSW</strong> Health for the development of<br />

notification criteria and associated protocols for existing recycled water schemes.<br />

We support the auditor’s recommendations, which we have summarised as follows:<br />

4 Develop an agreed timetable with <strong>NSW</strong> Health for the full implementation of the<br />

framework outlined in the Australian Guideline for <strong>Water</strong> Recycling, including<br />

validation of critical limits and the development of notification criteria to <strong>NSW</strong> Health<br />

for existing recycled water schemes (Recommendation 4, clause 3.6.3).<br />

Infrastructure performance<br />

Part 4 of the licence outlines the performance standards for water continuity, water<br />

pressure and sewage overflows. It also includes obligations relating to service<br />

quality and system performance indicators, and asset management. Under the<br />

risk-based auditing framework, we consider this section of the licence to be one that<br />

poses a high risk in terms of the likelihood and consequence of non-compliance.<br />

This year’s audit included a more comprehensive audit of the infrastructure and<br />

performance clauses of the licence than has been previously undertaken. <strong>Hunter</strong><br />

<strong>Water</strong> achieved full compliance with 8 out of the 9 audited sub-clauses associated<br />

with infrastructure performance. High compliance was awarded for the remaining<br />

clause. The reason for the award of a less than full compliance grade is discussed<br />

below.<br />

12 <strong>IPART</strong> <strong>Hunter</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Corporation</strong> <strong>Operational</strong> <strong>Audit</strong> <strong>2010</strong>/<strong>11</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!