05.03.2014 Views

Consultant Report - IPART

Consultant Report - IPART

Consultant Report - IPART

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SECTION ONE<br />

Executive Summary<br />

1. Instructions<br />

Instructions were received from the Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal (<strong>IPART</strong>) to<br />

undertake an investigation of the Discount Factor used in the formula for determining rentals for<br />

domestic waterfront occupancies:<br />

a) Recommend one or more evidence-based discount factors.<br />

b) Review and provide comment on:<br />

• the 144 separate valuations of occupancies referred to in WAG’s submission<br />

• WAG’s proposed discount factors and how they relate to LPI’s findings in this study<br />

c) Investigate comparable market rents, including berthing rentals at commercial marinas,<br />

swing moorings and other comparable facilities, as well as rents on adjoining land, and<br />

explain how these:<br />

• compare to rents being determined by the current formula<br />

• relate to findings and recommendations for points (a) to (b) above.<br />

2. Approach Taken for the Three Tasks<br />

In completing the work LPI adopted the following approach:<br />

a) Market Review - rental evidence was sourced from commercial marinas and private<br />

rental arrangements, across the state, for wet and dry storage areas for boats in a<br />

number of situations.<br />

b) Calculation of Discount Factors - A sample of 52 occupancies were selected as<br />

benchmarks from approximately 24 Precincts located across the state. The sample<br />

was selected with the purpose of representing regional, metropolitan and Sydney<br />

Harbour locations. Occupancies were individually valued to determine a land value<br />

specific to each occupancy.<br />

In the course of analysis it was found that the attributes which affect land value<br />

differed for reclaimed and wetland and a different approach was required for each.<br />

Reclaimed land shows a direct relationship with immediately adjacent land and can<br />

be valued by way of applying a discount factor directly to that land (this alters from<br />

that derived by applying a discount factor to a Precinct Statutory Land Value<br />

(PSLV).<br />

Wetland, on the other hand, is restricted to the use to which it is put, consistent with<br />

erected structures, with the land value showing a relationship to that use rather than<br />

the adjoining land. Therefore, wetland has been valued by reference to limited<br />

available rental information based on similar uses.<br />

Consistent with instructions, these valuations have been used to determine separate<br />

discount factors for reclaimed land and wetland, as well as a single discount factor<br />

for all occupancies.<br />

c) Review of the Waterfront Action Group (WAG) analysis - LPI analysed the<br />

properties included in the WAG analysis and the discount factors that WAG<br />

recommended. The analysis was reviewed for accuracy and revised where<br />

considered appropriate. The relevance of the analysis in developing a single<br />

discount factor was considered and reported against.<br />

Investigation of Discount Factor used for determining rentals for Domestic Waterfront Occupancies<br />

Page 5 of 72

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!