05.03.2014 Views

Report

Report

Report

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

- 24 -<br />

(a)<br />

Lack of control<br />

Given the crucial role played by patent institutions<br />

in shaping innovation incentives, 29 the current<br />

system does not allow control over essential matters<br />

to ensure that it is meeting the changing needs of<br />

Hong Kong. For instance, the time required to<br />

process the designated patent applications (an<br />

average of 25 months in SIPO, and 43.9 months at<br />

EPO), 30 the cost and fee structure, and the patent<br />

standards are, to a certain extent, affected by the<br />

laws and practices of the designated patent offices.<br />

(b)<br />

Inconvenience to local inventors<br />

An applicant who wants to seek patent protection in<br />

Hong Kong alone cannot apply for a standard patent<br />

directly in Hong Kong. He has to first file a patent<br />

application at one of the designated patent offices.<br />

The application takes time and may involve<br />

complicated procedures. It may be costly, as<br />

foreign patent agents have to be engaged and extra<br />

filing costs are charged for filing an application at<br />

the designated office. This extra step of filing the<br />

29<br />

See WIPO, “World Intellectual Property <strong>Report</strong> 2011 – The Changing Face of Innovation”<br />

(p.12) –<br />

“economic research has come to recognise the crucial role played by patent institutions in shaping<br />

innovation incentives. Patent institutions perform the essential tasks of ensuring the quality of<br />

patents granted and providing balanced dispute resolution. Unprecedented levels of patenting have<br />

put these institutions under considerable pressure. Many patent offices have seen growing<br />

backlogs of pending applications.” “The choices patent offices face can have far-reaching<br />

consequences on incentives to innovate. These include the amount of fees to charge, how to<br />

involve third parties in the patenting process, how best to make use of [Information and<br />

Communication Technologies] and the level and type of international cooperation to pursue. In<br />

making these choices, a key challenge is to reconcile incentives for efficient office operations with<br />

a patenting process that promotes society’s best interest.”<br />

30<br />

The average duration is calculated according to the patent examination pendency between 2005<br />

and 2009 stated in the Annual <strong>Report</strong>s of EPO and SIPO.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!