05.03.2014 Views

Report

Report

Report

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 1 : Standard Patent System (64 submissions received)<br />

1. What benefits will an OGP system bring to Hong Kong? Will an OGP system promote local innovation and enhance patent quality?<br />

and technology hub.<br />

Biochemistry Alumni Association, HKUST is of the view that the proposed OGP<br />

system will not only bring abstract IP into more solid, tangible assets in Hong Kong<br />

industries, but also provide the niche for multinational corporations and research<br />

experts to create their business opportunities with Hong Kong serving as a platform;<br />

transforming Hong Kong into an international IP exchange hub. With such<br />

function, Hong Kong would definitely attract entrepreneurs, research experts and IP<br />

specialists to station and expand their projects; resulting in the creation of more<br />

career opportunities for experts of both legal and technical background as well as an<br />

atmosphere for the cooperation and collaboration between the industries and the<br />

academia to work out the best solutions to fulfil the technological development with<br />

marketable commercial values. Patent quality will surely be enhanced and the<br />

support of open innovation in universities and research institutes will be promoted.<br />

1.5 Legal Practitioners / Patent Practitioners<br />

Richard R. Halstead (UK Chartered Patent<br />

Attorney, ex-president of the HKITMP)<br />

Chris Murray (Patent Attorney)<br />

A group of professionally qualified patent<br />

attorneys currently practising in Hong Kong<br />

(“QPA Group”):<br />

(a) Timothy J. Letters (Registered<br />

Australian Patent Attorney, Registered<br />

New Zealand Patent Attorney)<br />

(b) Laurence Thoo (Registered Australian<br />

Richard R. Halstead considers that the present re-registration system has nothing<br />

wrong and if some changes have to be made, no structural changes should be<br />

introduced:<br />

(a) he considers credibility of patents issued to be very important to the system<br />

users and the public and that, even by setting up an OGP system, Hong Kong<br />

could hardly match up with the efficiency and level of expertise of<br />

well-established patent offices such as the United Kingdom Intellectual<br />

Property Office (“UKIPO”) and SIPO;<br />

(b) he believes, by pointing out that most consumers prefer to use the unified<br />

examination system under EPO rather than filing in individual countries, a lack<br />

of original patent grant system does not correlate with the ability to innovate;<br />

(c) he considers abuse of the patent system by seeking to enforce invalid patents<br />

70

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!