15.04.2014 Views

Download Thesis in Pdf Format - Theoretical Nuclear Physics and ...

Download Thesis in Pdf Format - Theoretical Nuclear Physics and ...

Download Thesis in Pdf Format - Theoretical Nuclear Physics and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

5.4. The Glauber Approach 45<br />

shape of the elastic nucleon-nucleon cross section. The elastic scatter<strong>in</strong>g amplitude<br />

of Eq. (5.33) is directly related to the elastic differential cross section through the<br />

follow<strong>in</strong>g expression<br />

d 2 σ el<br />

d∆<br />

= 1 k 2 f<br />

|f el (∆)| 2 = σ2 tot(1 + ɛ 2 )<br />

16π 2 exp(−∆ 2 β 2 ) , (5.34)<br />

which is the st<strong>and</strong>ard high-energy approximation of the elastic differential cross<br />

section. Integrat<strong>in</strong>g this differential cross section leaves us with<br />

σ el =<br />

∫ d 2 σ el<br />

d∆ d∆ = σ2 tot(1 + ɛ 2 )<br />

16π 2 β 2 . (5.35)<br />

This expression allows to derive the value of the slope parameter from the experimentally<br />

known values of the elastic cross section <strong>and</strong> the ratios of the real to<br />

imag<strong>in</strong>ary part of the forward elastic scatter<strong>in</strong>g amplitudes. An example of such<br />

a calculation can be found <strong>in</strong> Fig. 5.8, that has been taken from Ref. [65]. In this<br />

reference use is made of a widely spread partial-wave analysis of nucleon-nucleon<br />

elastic scatter<strong>in</strong>g data by Arndt et al. [66, 67, 68, 69, 70]. We use the experimental<br />

values for ɛ pp <strong>and</strong> ɛ pn of Ref. [64] however; they can be found <strong>in</strong> Fig. 5.9.<br />

By analogy with the central amplitude, the sp<strong>in</strong>-orbit amplitude can be parametrized<br />

as<br />

fpN s = γ k f σpN<br />

tot<br />

(<br />

4π<br />

(ɛs pN + i)exp − ∆2β pN<br />

s2 )<br />

. (5.36)<br />

2<br />

Let us now consider the case of central scatter<strong>in</strong>g scatter<strong>in</strong>g. Invert<strong>in</strong>g Eq. (5.29)<br />

leaves us with<br />

Γ(k f , ⃗ b) = 2π<br />

ik f<br />

∫<br />

d ⃗ ∆<br />

(2π) 2 exp(−i⃗ ∆ ·⃗b)f E ( ⃗ ∆) . (5.37)<br />

Insert<strong>in</strong>g the parametrization of Eq. (5.33) <strong>in</strong>to this expression, gives us then the<br />

follow<strong>in</strong>g expression for the profile function :<br />

Γ(k f , ⃗ b) = σtot pN (1 − iɛ (<br />

pN)<br />

exp −<br />

4πβ 2 pN<br />

b2<br />

2β 2 pN<br />

)<br />

. (5.38)<br />

In the analysis of the proton-nucleus scatter<strong>in</strong>g data, the sp<strong>in</strong>less version of<br />

Glauber theory was very succesfull [5, 71]. As can be <strong>in</strong>ferred from Fig. 5.6, the<br />

sp<strong>in</strong>-dependent contributions to the proton scatter<strong>in</strong>g process are relatively weak<br />

for higher k<strong>in</strong>etic energies. All results that are presented <strong>in</strong> this work are obta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

with<strong>in</strong> the framework of the sp<strong>in</strong>less version of the Glauber theory.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!