Download Thesis in Pdf Format - Theoretical Nuclear Physics and ...
Download Thesis in Pdf Format - Theoretical Nuclear Physics and ...
Download Thesis in Pdf Format - Theoretical Nuclear Physics and ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Chapter 7<br />
Off-Shell Ambiguities<br />
A major po<strong>in</strong>t of concern <strong>in</strong> any A(e, e ′ p)B calculation are the ambiguities regard<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the off-shell electron-proton coupl<strong>in</strong>g. Most multi-body calculations do not obey<br />
current conservation <strong>and</strong> as outl<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> Sec. 4, a variety of prescriptions have been<br />
proposed to partially cure this deficiency. Any attempt to address off-shell effects<br />
from the microscopic po<strong>in</strong>t of view seems to fail at some po<strong>in</strong>t.<br />
In this section we will attempt to quantify the ambiguities caused by the use<br />
of different current operators <strong>and</strong> the methods employed to restore current conservation.<br />
Hereby, we will concentrate, not only on differential cross sections <strong>and</strong><br />
structure functions, but also on polarization observables <strong>and</strong> left-right asymmetries.<br />
A key issue <strong>in</strong> these considerations will be the Q 2 dependence of the off-shell ambiguities.<br />
We adopt a heuristic view <strong>and</strong> estimate the sensitivity of the calculated<br />
observables by compar<strong>in</strong>g the results obta<strong>in</strong>ed with different viable prescriptions<br />
for the electron-proton coupl<strong>in</strong>g. These <strong>in</strong>vestigations will allow us to put forward<br />
favorable choices for the current operators that produce reaction observables which<br />
are reasonably stable aga<strong>in</strong>st m<strong>in</strong>or changes.<br />
We start our <strong>in</strong>vestigations <strong>in</strong>to the role of off-shell ambiguities by consider<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the 16 O(e, e ′ p) differential cross section at Q 2 = 0.8 (GeV/c) 2 <strong>and</strong> ω = 0.439 GeV, <strong>in</strong><br />
quasi-perpendicular k<strong>in</strong>ematics. Fig. 7.1 compares the predictions for the differential<br />
cross section for various choices of the current operator. This is done by compar<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the predictions relative to the CC2 results. In l<strong>in</strong>e with other <strong>in</strong>vestigations [41,<br />
42, 101], we f<strong>in</strong>d that the ambiguities grow with <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g miss<strong>in</strong>g momenta. This<br />
is not so surpris<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> can be understood <strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g sense. Short-range <strong>and</strong><br />
tensor forces give rise to strong nucleon correlations among the nucleons <strong>in</strong> the mean<br />
field, with the result that the Fermi surface is smeared out significantly. This means<br />
that relatively high excited states are present <strong>and</strong> contribute to the high miss<strong>in</strong>g<br />
77