15.04.2014 Views

Download Thesis in Pdf Format - Theoretical Nuclear Physics and ...

Download Thesis in Pdf Format - Theoretical Nuclear Physics and ...

Download Thesis in Pdf Format - Theoretical Nuclear Physics and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 7<br />

Off-Shell Ambiguities<br />

A major po<strong>in</strong>t of concern <strong>in</strong> any A(e, e ′ p)B calculation are the ambiguities regard<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the off-shell electron-proton coupl<strong>in</strong>g. Most multi-body calculations do not obey<br />

current conservation <strong>and</strong> as outl<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> Sec. 4, a variety of prescriptions have been<br />

proposed to partially cure this deficiency. Any attempt to address off-shell effects<br />

from the microscopic po<strong>in</strong>t of view seems to fail at some po<strong>in</strong>t.<br />

In this section we will attempt to quantify the ambiguities caused by the use<br />

of different current operators <strong>and</strong> the methods employed to restore current conservation.<br />

Hereby, we will concentrate, not only on differential cross sections <strong>and</strong><br />

structure functions, but also on polarization observables <strong>and</strong> left-right asymmetries.<br />

A key issue <strong>in</strong> these considerations will be the Q 2 dependence of the off-shell ambiguities.<br />

We adopt a heuristic view <strong>and</strong> estimate the sensitivity of the calculated<br />

observables by compar<strong>in</strong>g the results obta<strong>in</strong>ed with different viable prescriptions<br />

for the electron-proton coupl<strong>in</strong>g. These <strong>in</strong>vestigations will allow us to put forward<br />

favorable choices for the current operators that produce reaction observables which<br />

are reasonably stable aga<strong>in</strong>st m<strong>in</strong>or changes.<br />

We start our <strong>in</strong>vestigations <strong>in</strong>to the role of off-shell ambiguities by consider<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the 16 O(e, e ′ p) differential cross section at Q 2 = 0.8 (GeV/c) 2 <strong>and</strong> ω = 0.439 GeV, <strong>in</strong><br />

quasi-perpendicular k<strong>in</strong>ematics. Fig. 7.1 compares the predictions for the differential<br />

cross section for various choices of the current operator. This is done by compar<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the predictions relative to the CC2 results. In l<strong>in</strong>e with other <strong>in</strong>vestigations [41,<br />

42, 101], we f<strong>in</strong>d that the ambiguities grow with <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g miss<strong>in</strong>g momenta. This<br />

is not so surpris<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> can be understood <strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g sense. Short-range <strong>and</strong><br />

tensor forces give rise to strong nucleon correlations among the nucleons <strong>in</strong> the mean<br />

field, with the result that the Fermi surface is smeared out significantly. This means<br />

that relatively high excited states are present <strong>and</strong> contribute to the high miss<strong>in</strong>g<br />

77

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!