19.04.2014 Views

TRS435_web

TRS435_web

TRS435_web

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3. NON-PROLIFERATION ASPECTS OF PARTITIONING<br />

AND TRANSMUTATION<br />

As previously discussed, P&T has been considered by some States as a<br />

technical option for long term HLLW management strategies. P&T technologies<br />

involve the separation (partitioning) of MAs such as neptunium and<br />

americium from HLW to reduce its radiotoxicity. Thus the application of P&T<br />

techniques to a nuclear fuel cycle could result in increased inventories of<br />

separated neptunium and americium, which, prima facie, could pose a proliferation<br />

risk, because these materials could be used for nuclear explosive devices.<br />

At the very least, partitioning and subsequent transmutation of these materials<br />

through irradiation in dedicated nuclear facilities (FRs or ADSs) would<br />

certainly have an impact on safeguards implementation at facilities involved in<br />

P&T. Given the potential proliferation risk associated with a P&T strategy, the<br />

non-proliferation aspects of P&T should be carefully addressed at an early<br />

stage of development.<br />

An evaluation of the proliferation risks potentially posed by P&T developments<br />

and applications and of their impact on IAEA safeguards implementation,<br />

and studies of proliferation resistance measures, needs to be an integral<br />

part of the investigation and assessment of P&T strategies and techniques.<br />

3.1. PROLIFERATION POTENTIAL OF NEPTUNIUM AND<br />

AMERICIUM<br />

It has been recognized for many years that some TRUs other than<br />

plutonium, in particular neptunium and americium, if available in sufficient<br />

quantities, could be used for nuclear explosive devices. Their respective critical<br />

masses are estimated to be of the same order as those of some other fissile<br />

actinides (i.e. ~50 kg). Owing to its long half-life (2 140 000 years), neptunium<br />

has no heat or radiation emissions that would complicate its use in a nuclear<br />

explosive device. Americium, however, produces high levels of heat and<br />

radiation, which would greatly complicate its use in a nuclear weapon; it would<br />

therefore require considerably more skill and resources to handle and use<br />

americium to manufacture a nuclear device. Other transuranics formed in fuel<br />

during the operation of a nuclear reactor (e.g. curium, berkelium and<br />

californium) also have fissionable isotopes. However, their more limited availability,<br />

high thermal output, short half-lives and other nuclear properties make<br />

them unsuitable for use in nuclear explosive devices. The results of an extensive<br />

21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!