19.04.2014 Views

TRS435_web

TRS435_web

TRS435_web

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

adioactive that it would not be suitable for the construction of a nuclear<br />

weapon. Similar observations have already been made for the IFR fuel cycle<br />

[18], in which the material is considered to be self-protecting for the reasons<br />

mentioned above. The arguments put forward in Section 3.4.3 on the lack of<br />

‘attractiveness’ of the product (isotopic quality, chemical purity, heat output<br />

and radiation) also apply.<br />

3.5.4.1. Safeguardability of pyroprocessing<br />

According to the present safeguards inspection system, effective<br />

safeguarding of pyroprocessing plants would be more difficult than is the case<br />

for conventional plants, since it is more difficult to measure and keep track of<br />

the fissile material in the process. The ITU and CRIEPI have been working on<br />

methods for the quantitative analysis of plutonium and MAs in salt and<br />

cadmium matrices.<br />

In order to establish a material inventory, a bulk measurement (volume<br />

or mass) must be taken, followed by a sample from the bulk and a<br />

measurement of the compound concentration in the sample. Whereas the<br />

fissile material inventory can be determined by bulk measurement of the initial<br />

metal alloy mass of spent fuel, sampling of the solidified electrolyte or of the<br />

metal cathode is much more difficult than in aqueous processes. At this early<br />

stage of process development it has been observed that the material sometimes<br />

suffers from lack of homogeneity, hence a higher number of samples have to be<br />

taken for analysis. Effective safeguards verification of fissile material at new<br />

types of pyroprocessing plant has to be developed.<br />

With respect to analytical methods, well established chemical methods<br />

such as isotope dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS) or inductively coupled<br />

plasma mass spectrometry (ICP–MS) can be applied for the assay of plutonium<br />

and MAs. Chemical sample preparation will be required, whichever of the two<br />

analytical methods is applied. It is, however, relatively labour intensive and<br />

requires a careful study of the chemical recoveries of the critical elements.<br />

IDMS cannot be applied to neptunium, due to the lack of an appropriate<br />

spike isotope. Americium and curium can be measured by IDMS using 243 Am<br />

and 248 Cm as spikes. ICP–MS can be applied to all MA elements. However,<br />

separation chemistry (e.g. ion exchange, extraction chromatography or high<br />

performance liquid chromatography) is still required to avoid isobaric interferences.<br />

Better radiometric methods can be used for the assay of MAs in<br />

samples from pyroprocessing. The efforts required for sample preparation<br />

can be reduced to a minimum. Development work in this context is being<br />

33

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!