TRS435_web
TRS435_web
TRS435_web
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
3.3.1. Short and medium term impact<br />
In the short term, the currently designed monitoring scheme for<br />
neptunium and americium would be a cost effective means of providing<br />
assurance that the quantities of separated neptunium and americium in CSA<br />
States, including those resulting from P&T development programmes, are, and<br />
remain, small. Under this regime, large scale laboratory facilities engaged in<br />
developing actinide partitioning technology would be subject to FSV in order<br />
to maintain confidence. It would also enable the IAEA to inform the Board of<br />
Governors in a timely manner whenever the accumulation of separated<br />
neptunium and americium in a CSA State was about to become substantial.<br />
However, strengthened monitoring arrangements at specific facilities or in a<br />
specific CSA State might become necessary in the medium term, when technological<br />
advances in partitioning have been made and separation activities have<br />
become significant. Strengthened arrangements could include an increase in<br />
the intensity of and an extension of the FSV activities as currently designed,<br />
and possibly an expansion of FSV to include americium, in order to deal with<br />
the changed situation, and would require close cooperation of the State and<br />
facility operators involved.<br />
3.3.2. Long term impact<br />
The long term impact of P&T on nuclear non-proliferation could become<br />
significant and extensive when the application of a P&T cycle reaches the<br />
industrial scale. It would involve institutional arrangements (political, legal and<br />
commercial) and IAEA safeguards.<br />
3.3.2.1. Impact on institutional arrangements<br />
If the development of P&T resulted in industrial scale applications, and<br />
substantial quantities of separated neptunium and americium became<br />
available, it would certainly have a significant impact on nuclear nonproliferation<br />
institutions, since the monitoring schemes as currently designed<br />
or subsequently strengthened would be insufficient to deal with such circumstances.<br />
It seems likely that the application of IAEA safeguards with detailed<br />
material accountancy would be necessary for such industrial scale applications<br />
of P&T. In order for neptunium and americium to become subject to<br />
safeguards, these materials would have to be included in the statutory<br />
definition of special fissionable material, which could be done by a determination<br />
to that effect by the IAEA Board of Governors. Each party to a CSA<br />
would need to accept the change in the definition of nuclear material in its<br />
25