27.04.2014 Views

The Glencairn Uprising, 1653-54 Helen Baker Department of ...

The Glencairn Uprising, 1653-54 Helen Baker Department of ...

The Glencairn Uprising, 1653-54 Helen Baker Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

labourers’ wages. <strong>The</strong> soldiers’ allowances were similarly several months in arrears<br />

and the stock <strong>of</strong> available ammunition was dangerously low.<br />

Alongside maintaining garrisons, the English strategy involved guarding routes<br />

between the Highlands and Lowlands which might be used by raiders, preventing<br />

more individuals joining the rebels, and suppressing bands <strong>of</strong> moss-troopers – as the<br />

English termed all small bands <strong>of</strong> mounted men carrying on partisan warfare in the<br />

Lowlands - on the Borders. 153<br />

By September the English effort was aided by the re-emergence <strong>of</strong> one <strong>of</strong> the greatest<br />

sources <strong>of</strong> weakness in the Royalist camp. Traditional enmities were resurfacing and<br />

were judged by observers such as Robert Baillie as a major obstacle to Royalist<br />

victory: ‘behold inward division doth hazard all at the very beginning.’ 1<strong>54</strong> Although<br />

the cause <strong>of</strong> Charles II had promoted a sense <strong>of</strong> hitherto unheard <strong>of</strong> unity between<br />

Lowlanders and Highlanders, the traditional rivalries between clans <strong>of</strong> both regions<br />

had never been fully suppressed. Highlanders regarded themselves as having the<br />

greatest authority and freedom in Scotland while the Lowlanders wished to secure<br />

themselves from the ‘barbarous cruelty and treachery’ <strong>of</strong> their Highland brethren. 155<br />

<strong>The</strong> Highland chieftains were, therefore, reluctant to serve under <strong>Glencairn</strong>, a<br />

Lowlander but, ironically, it was a fellow Lowlander, the Earl <strong>of</strong> Balcarres, who<br />

brought the hostilities to a head. Balcarres was already under suspicion because <strong>of</strong> his<br />

association with Col. Joseph Bampfield who was rightly suspected <strong>of</strong> being an<br />

English agent by the King. However, it appears that Balcarres’s opposition to<br />

<strong>Glencairn</strong> was founded on personal dislike rather than political discord. In July and<br />

August the pair exchanged a number <strong>of</strong> biting letters concerning <strong>Glencairn</strong>’s<br />

leadership. Balcarres then attempted to convince Lorne, Seaforth and Atholl that the<br />

153 Willcock, J. A Scots Earl in Covenanting Times, p.48 and Firth, C.H. Scotland and the<br />

Commonwealth, p.xix.<br />

1<strong>54</strong> Laing, D. (ed.) <strong>The</strong> Letters and Journals <strong>of</strong> Robert Baillie. Vol. 3 (Edinburgh: Robert Ogle, 1842),<br />

p.250.<br />

155 Firth, C.H. Scotland and the Commonwealth, p.185. Smout has explained the origins <strong>of</strong> the division<br />

between Highlanders and Lowlanders. <strong>The</strong> ultimate rift between both regions was inspired partly by<br />

cultural factors. By the fourteenth century, English had become the universal language in the Lowlands<br />

but the Highlanders spoke Gaelic. Smout, T.C. A History <strong>of</strong> the Scottish People 1560-1830 (London:<br />

Collins, 1969), pp.34, 42-4. For a discussion <strong>of</strong> the differences in Highland and Lowland life see<br />

Hopkins, P. Glencoe and the End <strong>of</strong> the Highland War (Edinburgh: John Donald Publishers, Ltd.,<br />

c.1986), pp.11-12.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!