27.04.2014 Views

The Glencairn Uprising, 1653-54 Helen Baker Department of ...

The Glencairn Uprising, 1653-54 Helen Baker Department of ...

The Glencairn Uprising, 1653-54 Helen Baker Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Earl <strong>of</strong> Loudoun, late Lord Chancellor <strong>of</strong> Scotland – had stolen into his father’s<br />

territory to seize cows.<br />

Monck was clearly furious at Lorne’s activities. In his letter <strong>of</strong> 12 September, he<br />

commented that: “I cannot finde but that the Marquesse <strong>of</strong> Argyll is rightous though<br />

the Countrey more incline to his sonne then to him.’ By this time, the hostility<br />

between Argyle and Lorne was to such extent that the former had applied to the<br />

English authorities for protection. <strong>The</strong> well-known Resolutioner, Robert Baillie, wrote<br />

<strong>of</strong> Argyle’s widespread unpopularity: “<strong>The</strong> people’s great hatred lyes on him above<br />

any one man, and whatever befalls him, few does pitie it: at this very time his state is<br />

very staggering.” 216<br />

However, Monck was so suspicious <strong>of</strong> Argyle’s involvement with the Royalists that<br />

he threatened to withdraw his orders for a garrison at Inveraray. Certainly members <strong>of</strong><br />

Monck’s entourage were convinced <strong>of</strong> Argyle’s guilt: John Baynes wrote to his<br />

cousin on 9 September that the Argyle had ‘pretended’ the vessel would be safe and<br />

that ‘his name is Archgyle’. It is unlikely that Argyle was guilty <strong>of</strong> double-dealing at<br />

this point: after all, he had remained loyal to the English when it seemed less certain<br />

that they would victor over the Royalists. <strong>The</strong> population <strong>of</strong> Argyllshire was also<br />

more inclined to ensure their material well-being than Monck gave them credit.<br />

Lorne’s cow-stealing activity led to much resentment and, at one stage, he was<br />

wounded in the neck after his companions decided they had more to gain by capturing<br />

him to present to the English. It is unsurprising that the Royalist disagreement that<br />

had proved so disruptive in the early months <strong>of</strong> the revolt was increasing during a<br />

time <strong>of</strong> defeat, hunger and the onset <strong>of</strong> winter. 217<br />

Monck was aware that although the English had managed to suppress this rebellion, it<br />

had increased the destitution and resentment already experienced by many Scottish<br />

people. From August 16<strong>54</strong>, when he requested the continuation <strong>of</strong> the garrison at<br />

Lochaber, Monck stressed the importance <strong>of</strong> securing against further revolt by<br />

maintaining a strong military presence in Scotland. Many garrisons were established<br />

216 Laing, D. (ed.) <strong>The</strong> Letters and Journals <strong>of</strong> Robert Baillie, p.288.<br />

217 Willcock, J. A Scots Earl in Covenanting Times, pp.67-69; Dow, F.D. Cromwellian Scotland,<br />

pp.133-134 and Akerman, J.Y (ed.) Letters from Roundhead Officers, p.97.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!