28.04.2014 Views

Chapter 9 - LOT publications

Chapter 9 - LOT publications

Chapter 9 - LOT publications

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Accounts of SLI in Afrikaans<br />

Finally, as noted above, Gopnik’s Feature Deficit Hypothesis does not<br />

seem to offer any account for the difficulties children with SLI<br />

experience with the production and interpretation of question<br />

constructions, (non-)co-referential relationships, and passive<br />

constructions. Accordingly, it is not clear whether, on this hypothesis,<br />

Afrikaans-speaking children with SLI should experience difficulties in<br />

this regard when compared to their typically developing peers.<br />

9.4.3. Are the predictions of the Feature Deficit Hypothesis for<br />

Afrikaans borne out?<br />

There were at least five predictions made about the language of<br />

Afrikaans-speaking children with SLI, in terms of Gopnik’s Feature<br />

Deficit Hypothesis. The first was that such children should find it<br />

difficult to consistently use the correct singular vs. plural forms of nouns;<br />

hence, they would have to rely on memorisation to determine the plural<br />

form of each noun. Recall that, due to the nature of the Afrikaans plural<br />

system, the actual prediction is that Afrikaans-speaking children with and<br />

without SLI should demonstrate more or less the same level of accuracy<br />

in using plural forms. This prediction was not borne out by the<br />

Afrikaans data: The 6-year-olds with SLI were outperformed by those<br />

without SLI.<br />

The second prediction concerned grammatical gender. As such gender is<br />

not encoded in Afrikaans, it was predicted that the language of<br />

Afrikaans-speaking children with SLI should not demonstrate any<br />

problems in this regard. No task specifically assessed grammatical<br />

gender; therefore, it is not possible to state whether or not this<br />

hypothesis was supported.<br />

The third prediction concerned the grammatical expression of person<br />

and case: Afrikaans-speaking children with and those without SLI should<br />

at times use the incorrect form of the pronoun. This prediction was not<br />

fully borne out by the Afrikaans data. The typically developing 6-yearolds<br />

fared better than those with SLI and better than the 4-year-olds in<br />

terms of both elicited and spontaneous production of pronouns. Certain<br />

errors of case (on both pronouns and se-constructions) were made by the<br />

6-year-olds with SLI but not by those without SLI.<br />

270

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!