16.05.2014 Views

EIPOT Final Project Report - Stockholm Environment Institute

EIPOT Final Project Report - Stockholm Environment Institute

EIPOT Final Project Report - Stockholm Environment Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ERA-NET SKEP <strong>Project</strong> <strong>EIPOT</strong> (www.eipot.eu)<br />

“Development of a methodology for the assessment of global environmental impacts of traded goods and services”<br />

of a given product. <strong>Environment</strong>al extensions such as the use of raw materials or emissions of air<br />

pollutants can be linearly linked to the input-output framework. However, production technologies in<br />

different countries can only be modelled in an MRIO model.<br />

Process- and product-specific bottom-up methods have an important role to play. Even at the meso<br />

level, pure top-down approaches reach limitations on precision and the uncertainty stemming from<br />

different products being aggregated into individual sectors (problem of homogeneity assumption) can<br />

be high (see Chapter 5.3). Furthermore, top-down models are often based on monetary flows that do<br />

not always depict physical flows adequately. Process-specific information is valuable in these cases<br />

to reduce uncertainty and to extend the range of policy and research questions to the micro level.<br />

Concentrating on the analysis of trade flows implies looking at the meso to macro level. Methods such<br />

as MRIO or MFA have often been criticised for their high level of aggregation and, consequently, lack<br />

of detail. So far, no method or approach has the necessary detail to separate factories or companies<br />

in the supply chain. The challenge lies in coming down from the macro-economic level to the sectoral<br />

level – projects such as EXIOPOL 14 or FORWAST 15 show that this is feasible but needs considerable<br />

mathematical effort (see, for instance, Tukker 2007; Tukker et al. 2009). Any disaggregation of sectors<br />

will come at the price of increased resource demand and will be limited in scope. For example, the<br />

combination of arable farming and horticulture in one aggregated agricultural sector covers up the<br />

different characteristics of individual sub-sectors. Splitting up the aggregated sector into these subsectors<br />

results in an individual horticultural sector, but still hides the differences between greenhouse<br />

vegetables and those grown in the open, or between food and non-food products, like flowers.<br />

Alternative ways of using process-specific information will therefore have to be found in these cases.<br />

Currently, no single method can be applied to all research questions associated with trade and the<br />

environment. In the future, however, it is conceivable that more sophisticated and detailed models can<br />

be developed which cover macro to micro levels. In addition to specifying the conceptual design for<br />

such a method, we provide a tentative outlook of emerging approaches that promise greater coverage<br />

of micro-level questions.<br />

4.2 <strong>Environment</strong>ally extended MRIO as methodological basis<br />

Generally, the System of Economic and <strong>Environment</strong>al Accounts (SEEA) constitutes a solid<br />

conceptual fundament for EE-IOA (United Nations 2003a) as it is a satellite account of the System of<br />

National (economic) Accounts (SNA, United Nations 1993). Some countries have adopted an even<br />

closer integration of economic and environmental accounts in the NAMEA system which stands for<br />

"National Accounting Matrix including <strong>Environment</strong>al Accounts" (de Haan and Keuning 1996). As<br />

stated in our interim report, SEEA consistently links economic statistics and environmental statistics,<br />

illustrating the contributions of different economic sectors and different actors (producers, final<br />

consumers) to the overall economic output and to the related environmental consequences.<br />

Information on environmental pressures and impacts, as embraced in the NAMEA tables, can be<br />

connected to traded goods and services via monetary input-output tables. The same holds for<br />

materials with the design of economy-wide MFA as a fully integrated sub-module.<br />

In general, the SEEA/NAMEA framework is specified at the national level. Since SRIO lacks<br />

region/country-specific information, MRIO is more appropriate for quantifying and assessing the<br />

transnational environmental impacts of trade flows of goods and services. The full version of MRIO<br />

14<br />

15<br />

http://www.feem-project.net/exiopol<br />

http://forwast.brgm.fr<br />

23

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!